Jump to content

Rep:Mod:SJL1218

From ChemWiki

NH3 Molecule

NH3 Optimisation Summary

Molecule NH3
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP) -56.55776873
RMS Gradient Norm 0.00000485
Point Group C3V

NH3 Items List, Model and Structural Information

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-5.986271D-10
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
Ammonia

N-H bond distance: 1.02Å

H-N-H bond angle: 106°

link to .log file

NH3 Vibrations and Atomic Charges

Vibrational Modes

Wavenumber cm-1 1090 1694 1694 3461 3590 3590
Symmetry A1 E E A1 E E
Intensity (arbitary units) 145 14 14 1 0 0
Image

NH3 Vibrations Questions

How many modes do you expect from the 3N-6 rule?

3(4 atoms)-6 = 6 vibrational modes.

Which modes are degenerate?

Two modes with wavenumber 1694cm-1 and two modes with wavenumber 3590cm-1 are degenerate.

Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations?

Bending modes: 1090cm-1, 1694cm-1.

Vibrational modes: 3461cm-1, 3590cm-1.

Which mode is highly symmetric?

Vibrational mode 3461cm-1 is highly symmetric

One mode is known as the "umbrella" mode, which one is this?

Bending mode 1090cm-1

How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia?

4 bands

Atomic Charges

Nitrogen Charge: -1.125C

Hydrogen Charge: 0.375C

Nitrogen is expected to have a negative charge because it is more electronegative, and hydrogen to be positive because it it less electronegative.

N2 and H2 Molecule

N2 Optimisation Summary

Molecule N2
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP) -109.52412868
RMS Gradient Norm 0.00000003
Point Group D*H

N2 Items List, Model and Structural Information

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.075650D-15
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
Nitrogen

N-N bond distance: 1.11Å

link to .log file

N2Vibrations and Atomic Charges

Vibrational Modes

Wavenumber cm-1 2457
Symmetry SGG
Intensity (arbitary units) 0
Image

Atomic Charges

Nitrogen Charge: 0C

Same atom so there are no electronegative differences.

H2 Optimisation Summary

Molecule H2
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP) -1.17853936
RMS Gradient Norm 0.00002276
Point Group D*H

H2 Items List, Model and Structural Information

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000039     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000039     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000052     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.043043D-09
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
Hydrogen

H-H bond distance: 0.72Å

link to .log file

H2 Vibrations and Atomic Charges

Vibrational Modes

Wavenumber cm-1 4466
Symmetry SGG
Intensity (arbitary units) 0
Image

Atomic Charges

Hydrogen Charge: 0C

Same atom so there are no electronegative differences.

N2 Conquest Search

Mono-metallic TM complex that coordinates N-N

Formula: C44H54N4P4RuW

Name: (1,1'-bis(Diethylphosphino)ruthenocene-P,P')-bis(dinitrogen-N)-bis(diphenyl(methyl)phosphino)-tungsten

Unique Identifier: CUHVAD

link to CCDC: [[1]]

N-N bond distance in diatomic N2: 1.11Å

N-N bond distances in C44H54N4P4RuW: 1.14Å and 1.16Å[1]

The N-N bond in tungsten transition metal complex has a longer and weaker bond than on its own as a molecule. This is due to the electron withdrawal property of the tungsten cation; electron density shifts from the N-N domain to the centre of the complex. Thus, the bond order of the N-N bond decreases, suggesting that the bond is weakened and increases in length. The experimental value will be the exact value whereas the bond length found using Gaussian is only an approximation, not taking into account any ionic character or other factors involved.

The Haber-Bosch process

N2 + 3H2 → 2NH3

E(NH3)= -56.5577687 a.u.(7 d.p)

2*E(NH3)= -113.1155375 a.u. (7 d.p)

E(N2)= -109.5240412 a.u. (7 d.p)

E(H2)= -1.1785394 a.u. (7 d.p)

3*E(H2)= -3.5356181 a.u. (7 d.p)

ΔE= 2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -0.0557907 a.u. (6 d.p)

ΔE= -146.5 kJ mol-1

The products are more stable because the reaction is exothermic so ammonia will end up with lower energy.

Choice of Small Molecule- CO

CO Optimisation Summary

Molecule CO
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP) -113.30945314
RMS Gradient Norm 0.00000202
Point Group C*V

CO Items List, Model and Structural Information

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000002     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-4.844559D-12
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
Carbon Monoxide

C-O bond distances: 1.14Å

link to .log file

CO Vibrations and Atomic Charges

Vibrational Modes

Wavenumber cm-1 2209
Symmetry SG
Intensity (arbitary units) 68
Image

Atomic Charges

Carbon Charge: 0.506C

Oxygen Charge: -0.506C

Oxygen has a negative charge because it is more electronegative than carbon.

CO Molecular Orbitals

Molecular Orbital g 4σ*u u g 1π*g
Images
Atomic Orbitals that contribute Carbon 2s

Oxygen 2s

Carbon 2s/2p

Oxygen 2s/2p

(s-p mixing)

Carbon 2p

Oxygen 2p

Carbon 2s/2p

Oxygen 2s/2p

(s-p mixing)

Carbon 2p

Oxygen 2p

Type of MO bonding Bonding Antibonding Bonding Bonding Antibonding
Depth of energy E= -1.16eV (in the HOMO/LUMO region) E= -0.57eV (in the HOMO/LUMO region) E= -0.47eV (in the HOMO/LUMO region) E= -0.37eV (in the HOMO/LUMO region) E= -0.02eV (in the HOMO/LUMO region)
Occupancy Occupied Occupied Occupied Occupied Unoccupied
Effect MO has on bonding Large effect on bonding. Formed from 2s AOs which are large and overlaps effectively. Large effect on bonding. Formed from s-p mixed AOs which are large and overlaps between the atoms effectively. Higher in energy than 3σ because this is an antibonding MO. Large effect on bonding. 2p-2p AOs are close in energy thus forming a strong contribution to the overall bonding. Significant effect on bonding. This orbital is the HOMO contributed from s-p mixed AOs forming a strong overlap. Significant effect on bonding. This orbital is the LUMO formed from 2p-2p AOs that are close in energy, hence strong interaction.

CH4 Molecule

Molecule NH3
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP) -40.52401404
RMS Gradient Norm 0.00003263
Point Group TD

CH4 Items List, Model and Structural Information

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000063     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000034     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000179     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000095     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-2.256043D-08
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
Methane

C-H bond distance: 1.09Å

H-C-H bond angle: 109°

link to .log file

CH4 Vibrations and Atomic Charges

Vibrational Modes

Wavenumber cm-1 1356 1356 1356 1579 1579 3046 3162 3162 3162
Symmetry T2 T2 T2 E E A1 T2 T2 T2
Intensity (arbitary units) 14 14 14 0 0 0 25 25 25
Image

Atomic Charges

Carbon Charge: -0.930C

Hydrogen Charge: 0.233C

Carbon has a negative charge because it is more electronegative than hydrogen.

  1. M.Yuki, T.Midorikawa, Y.Miyake, Y.Nishibayashi CCDC 759201: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination, 2010.

Marking

Note: All grades and comments are provisional and subject to change until your grades are officially returned via blackboard. Please do not contact anyone about anything to do with the marking of this lab until you have received your grade from blackboard.

Wiki structure and presentation 1/1

Is your wiki page clear and easy to follow, with consistent formatting?

YES

Do you effectively use tables, figures and subheadings to communicate your work?

YES

NH3 0.5/1

Have you completed the calculation and given a link to the file?

YES

Have you included summary and item tables in your wiki?

YES

Have you included a 3d jmol file or an image of the finished structure?

YES

Have you included the bond lengths and angles asked for?

YES

Have you included the “display vibrations” table?

YES

Have you added a table to your wiki listing the wavenumber and intensity of each vibration?

YES

Did you do the optional extra of adding images of the vibrations?

YES

Have you included answers to the questions about vibrations and charges in the lab script?

YES, most answers are correct. However there are only 2 visible peaks in the spectra of NH3, due to the low intensity of the other 2 peaks. (See infrared column in vibrations table.)

N2 and H2 0.5/0.5

Have you completed the calculations and included all relevant information? (summary, item table, structural information, jmol image, vibrations and charges)

YES

Crystal structure comparison 0.5/0.5

Have you included a link to a structure from the CCDC that includes a coordinated N2 or H2 molecule?

YES

Have you compared your optimised bond distance to the crystal structure bond distance?

YES

Haber-Bosch reaction energy calculation 1/1

Have you correctly calculated the energies asked for? ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]

YES

Have you reported your answers to the correct number of decimal places?

YES

Do your energies have the correct +/- sign?

YES

Have you answered the question, Identify which is more stable the gaseous reactants or the ammonia product?

YES

Your choice of small molecule 4.5/5

Have you completed the calculation and included all relevant information?

YES

Have you added information about MOs and charges on atoms?

YES, very good explanations overall. However the LUMO does not have an effect on the bonding within the molecule as it is unoccupied so does not effect the electrons or interactions in the molecule. In a reaction it could become at least partially occupied so it would have an impact on reactivity.

Independence 1/1

If you have finished everything else and have spare time in the lab you could:

Check one of your results against the literature, or

Do an extra calculation on another small molecule, or

You calculated CH4, well done!

Do some deeper analysis on your results so far