Jump to content

Rep:Mod:sf3014

From ChemWiki

NH3 Molecule

NH molecule

Calculations Information

Calculation Type = FREQ
Calculation Method = RB3LYP
Basis Set = 6-31G(d,p)
Charge = 0
Spin = Singlet
E(RB3LYP) = -56.44397188 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm = 0.05399560 a.u.
Imaginary Freq = 
Dipole Moment = 1.5008 Debye
Point Group = C3V

Optimisation Output


         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-5.986273D-10

Optimized N-H bond length = 1.018 Å

File:SF3014 NH3 OPT NEW.LOG

Vibrational Modes

caption
Modes Frequency (cm-1) Intensity (au)
1 1090 145
2 1694 14
3 1694 14
4 3461 1
5 3590 0
6 3590 0

The expected number of vibrational modes = 3N-6, where N is the number of atoms. Therefore, there are 6 vibrational modes but modes 2 and 3, and 5 and 6 are degenerate. The stretching modes are 4, 5 and 6, and the bending modes are 2 and 3. Mode 4, is a sysmetric stretch vibrational mode. The mode 1, is known as an umbrella mode. The number of bands expected to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous NH3 is 4.

Charge Analysis

caption
Atom Charge Density
N -1.125
H 0.375

File:Sf3014 charge NH2.tif

The charge density of N and H atoms in the NH3 molecule has been reported by Hunt et. al. [1] as -1.5053 and +0.351, respectively. These values were based on neutral bond orbital (NBO) analysis. The charge density of N in the NH3 molecule is negative due to the contribution of the lone pair of electrons.

N2 Molecule

N molecule

Calculations Information

Calculation Type = FREQ
Calculation Method = RB3LYP
Basis Set = 6-31G(d,p)
Charge = 0
Spin = Singlet
E(RB3LYP) = -109.52412417 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm = 0.00219852 a.u.
Imaginary Freq = 
Dipole Moment =  Debye
Point Group = D*H

Optimisation Output

Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-3.400975D-13

File:SF3014 N2 OPTIMISATION.LOG

Vibrational Modes

One vibrational mode with frequency of 2457 cm-1.

N2 Bond Length

The N-N bond length in the Chloro-nitrogen-2-phenylethenyl-bis(tri-isopropylphosphine)-ruthenium(ii) ([| ATALEM]) complex is 1.088 Å [2], where the optimized parameters from the B3LYP calculations gave an N-N bond length of 1.1055 Å. The N-N bond length was stated by Weber et. al. [3] as 1.09 Å. The difference in N-N bond length (± 0.01 Å) between the calculated and experimental values, for both free and coordinated N2 molecules, are too small to be significant.


H2 Molecule

N molecule

Calculations Information

Calculation Type = FREQ
Calculation Method = RB3LYP
Basis Set = 6-31G(d,p)
Charge = 0
Spin = Singlet
E(RB3LYP) = -1.15928020 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm = 0.09719500 a.u.
Imaginary Freq = 
Dipole Moment = 0.0000 Debye
Point Group = D*H

Optimisation Output

Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.164080D-13

Optimized H-H bond length = 0.7428 Å

File:SF3014 H2 OPTIMISATION.LOG


Vibrational Modes

One vibrational mode with frequency of 4466 cm-1.

Determining the Energy of NH3 Formation

Bond Energies/a.u.
NH3 N2 H2
-56.5577687299 -109.52412417 -1.17853935735

ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]=

ΔE=2*(-56.5577687299)-[E(-109.52412417)+3*E(-1.17853935735)]= -0.055795218 a.u.

ΔE=-146.5 Kj/mol

The energy of NH3 formation is exothermic, so the direction of the reaction favours the NH3 gas.


References

  1. P. A. Hunt, C. R. Ashworth, R. P. Matthews (2015) Chem. Soc. Rev., 44, 1257-1288.
  2. S. Jung, K. Ilg, C. D. Brandt, J. Wolf, H. Werner,(2004) Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 469480.
  3. Th. Weber, A.M. Smith I, E. Riedle, H.J. Neusser and E.W. Schlag (1990) CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 175(1,2), 79-83.