Jump to content

Rep:Mod:qwe107

From ChemWiki

NH3

Optimisation

Molecule- NH3

Calculation method- RB3LYP

Basis set- 6-31G(d.p)

Final energy E(RB3LYP) in atomic units (au)- -56.55776873

RMS gradient- 0.00000485

point group- C3V

Optimised bond length- 1.01798 nm

Optimised bond angle- 105.741°

Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES

The optimisation file is liked here

Frequency Analysis

Expected modes- (3X4)-6=6

Degenerate modes- modes 2 and 3 and modes 5 and 6

Bending vibrations- modes 1, 2, 3

Bond stretch vibrations- 4, 5, 6

Highly symmetric- mode 4

Umbrella mode- mode 1

Number of bands expected in an experimental spectrum- 3 however one has very flow intensity

Charge Analysis

Charge on the N-atom- -1.125

Charge on the H-atom- +0.375

The expected charges are negative on the N-atom and positive on the H-atom as Nitrogen is more electronegative and so will attract a higher charge density.

N2

Optimisation

Molecule- N2

Calculation method- RB3LYP

Basis set- 6-31G(d.p)

Final energy E(RB3LYP) in atomic units (au)- -109.52412868

RMS gradient- 0.00000365

point group- D∞h

Optimised bond length- 1.10550 nm

 Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000006     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000002     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000003     0.001200     YES

The optimisation file is liked here

Frequency Analysis

There is no peaks on the IR spectrum as the vibration does not have a change in dipole moment.

H2

Optimisation

Molecule- H2

Calculation method- RB3LYP

Basis set- 6-31G(d.p)

Final energy E(RB3LYP) in atomic units (au)- -1.17853936

RMS gradient- 0.00002276

point group- D∞h

Optimised bond length- 0.74274 nm

 Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000039     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000039     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000052     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000073     0.001200     YES

The optimisation file is liked here

Frequency Analysis

There is no peak on the IR spectrum as the vibration does not have a change in dipole moment.

Reaction energy for the formation of NH3

E(NH3)= -56.55776873 au

2*E(NH3)= -113.11553746 au

E(N2)= -109.52412868 au

E(H2)= -1.17853936 au

3*E(H2)= -3.53561808 au

ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -0.05579070 au

ΔE= -146.48 KJ/mol

Product, NH3, is more stable

[BH4]-

Optimisation

BH

Molecule- BH4-

Calculation method- RB3LYP

Basis set- 6-31G(d.p)

Final energy E(RB3LYP) in atomic units (au)- -27.24992701

RMS gradient- 0.00000671

point group- TD

Optimised bond length- 1.23933 nm

Optimised bond angle- 109.471°

 Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000013     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000007     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000065     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES

The optimisation file is liked here

Frequency Analysis

Expected modes- (3X5)-6=9

Degenerate modes- modes 1, 2 and 3, modes 4 and 5 and modes 6, 7 and 8

Bending vibrations- modes 1 to 5

Bond stretch vibrations- 6 to 9

Symmetric- modes 4, 5 and 9

Number of bands expected in an experimental spectrum- 2

Charge Analysis

Charge on the B-atom- -0.097

Charge on the H-atom- -0.226

Molecular orbitals

Molecular orbital Formation
Antibonding molecular orbital between the Hydrogen 1s orbital and the Boron 2s orbital. It is deep in energy. This does not contribute to bonding in the molecule.
Bonding molecular orbital between the Hydrogen 1s orbital and the Boron 2s orbital. It is The second lowest in energy.
There are three of this orbital, all equal in energy. One is along each axis. This is the the mixture of a 2p orbital from the Boron and the 1s orbitals on the Hydrogens. The two Hydrogens on each side match the phase of the 2p orbital on the same side. This is the HOMO.
This is the LUMO and has a positive value. This is the antibonding orbital between the Boron 2p orbital and the Hydrogens 1s orbitals. Instead on the Hydrogen orbitals matching phase with the 2p on the same side, the 2p is flipped and so they match phase with the opposing side. Again there are three of these, one on each axis.
This is also an unoccupied orbital with a positive value. This is the antibonding orbital between the 2s orbitals on the Hydrogens and the 2s orbital on the Boron.

H2SiO

Optimisation

Molecule- H2SiO

Calculation method- RB3LYP

Basis set- 6-31G(d.p)

Final energy E(RB3LYP) in atomic units (au)- -365.90001403

RMS gradient- 0.00000941

point group- CS

Optimised Si=O bond length- 1.53172

Optimised O-Si-H bond angle- 124.158°

Optimised Si-H bond length- 1.48652

Optimised H-Si-H bond angle- 111.686°

Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000023     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000009     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000023     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000017     0.001200     YES

The optimisation file is liked here

Frequency Analysis

Expected modes- (3X4)-6=6

Degenerate modes- none

Bending vibrations- modes 1 to 4

Bond stretch vibrations- modes 5 and 6

Symmetric- none

Number of bands expected in an experimental spectrum- 6 however some are very close and may merge. On the predicted spectrum from Gaussian 5 resolved peaks can be seen.

Charge Analysis

Charge on the O-atom- -0.502

Charge on the H-atom- -0.090

Charge on the Si-atom- +0.681