Jump to content

Rep:Mod:pag1234

From ChemWiki

NH3 molecule

Optimisation Results

Calculation Method: RB3LYP

Basis Set: 6-31G(d.p)

Final Energy: -56.55776873 a.u.

RMS Gradient: 0.00000485

Point Group: C3v

Bond Angle: 109.471o

Optimized N-H bond length 1.01798 Å

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES
Ammonia

The optimisation file is liked to here

Frequency Analysis

How many modes do you expect from the 3N-6 rule? Expect 6 Vibrational Modes from the 3N-6 rule.

Which modes are degenerate (ie have the same energy)? Modes 2,3 and 5,6 are degenerate

Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations? Bending Vibrations: 1, 2, 3 Stretching Vibrations: 4, 5, 6

Which mode is highly symmetric? 4 is highly symmetric

One mode is known as the "umbrella" mode, which one is this? 1 is the umbrella mode. It causes the greatest change in dipole moment and hence has the strongest peak.

How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia? 2 bands expected in an experimental spectrum as the last three modes have very low intensities. This is because the change in dipole moment caused by these modes is very little.

Charge Distribution

Charge on N: -1.125e

Charge on H: 0.375e

This is expected due to the difference in electronegativity of N and H, N being more electronegative.

N2 molecule

Optimisation Results

Calculation Method RB3LYP

Basis Set 6-31G(d.p)

Final Energy -109.52412868

RMS Gradient 0.00000134

Point Group Dh

Bond length: 1.10550 Å


         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000002     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000002     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES
Nitrogen

The optimisation file is liked to here


Frequency Analysis

How many modes do you expect from the 3N-5 rule? Expect 1 Vibrational Mode from the 3N-5 rule

Which modes are degenerate (ie have the same energy)? Only 1 mode present.

Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations? Bending Vibrations: None Stretching Vibrations: 1

Which mode is highly symmetric? 1

One mode is known as the "umbrella" mode, which one is this? None

How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous Nitrogen? 0

Charge Distribution

Charge on N: 0e

No difference in electronegativity and hence 0 charge.

H2 molecule

Optimisation Results

Calculation Method RB3LYP

Basis Set 6-31G(d.p)

Final Energy -1.17853936

RMS Gradient 0.00000017

Point Group Dh

Bond Length: 7.4279 Å

 Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES
Hydrogen


The optimisation file is liked to here

Frequency Analysis

How many modes do you expect from the 3N-5 rule? Expect 1 Vibrational Mode from the 3N-5 rule

Which modes are degenerate (ie have the same energy)? Only 1 mode present.

Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations? Bending Vibrations: None Stretching Vibrations: 1

Which mode is highly symmetric? 1

One mode is known as the "umbrella" mode, which one is this? None

How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous hydrogen? 0

Charge Distribution

Charge on H: 0e

No difference in electronegativity and hence 0 charge.

Reaction Energies

   E(NH3)= -56.55776873 a.u
   2*E(NH3)= -113.1155375 a.u
   E(N2)=  -109.52412868 a.u
   E(H2)= -1.17853936 a.u
   3*E(H2)= -3.53561808 a.u
   ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -10.05579074 a.u= -146.4785879 kJ mol -1

Ammonia is more stable than the reactants due to the negative total energy of the reaction (exothermic).

Literature Value Comparison

The found energy corresponds to 2 moles of ammonia and so the energy for 1 is -73.24 kJmol-1. This is significantly larger then the literature value of -45.95 kJmol-1 [1]. This discrepancy is due to the difference in the method utilized to calculate these values. Whilst one method (computational) makes use of quantum theory and is purely mathematically based, the literature value is an experimental one and is the physically observed value.

Molecule of Choice: CN-

Optimisation

Calculation Method: RB3LYP

Basis Set: 6-31G(d.p)

Final Energy: -92.82453153 a.u.

RMS Gradient: 0.00000704

Point Group: Cinfv

Dipole moment: 0.5236 Debye

Bond Length: 1.18409 Å

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000012     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000005     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000008     0.001200     YES
Cyanide

The optimisation file is liked to here

Frequency analysis

How many modes do you expect from the 3N-5 rule? Expect 1 Vibrational Mode from the 3N-5 rule

Which modes are degenerate (ie have the same energy)? Only 1 mode present.

Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations? Bending Vibrations: None Stretching Vibrations: 1

Which mode is highly symmetric? 1

One mode is known as the "umbrella" mode, which one is this? None

How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of Cyanide ion? 1

Charge

C: -0.246 e

N: -0.754 e

This is expected as the electronegativity of Nitrogen (3.04) is more than that of Carbon (2.55).

Orbital Diagram Flow Chart

This shows the energy levels of the MO and also the electron occupancy.

1s Orbitals

The images to the left correspond to 1 and 2 respectively as per the above flow chart. The AO contributing to make the MO are the 1s from C and N. MO on the left shows electron density close to Nitrogen while the MO on the right shows electron density close to Carbon hence both show no interaction between the AOs and are therefore non-bonding. 1 is deeper in energy than 2 as Nitrogen is more electronegative than Carbon. Both the MOs are occupied and completely filled.

2s Orbitals

The images above correspond to 3 and 4 on the Orbital Diagram respectively. The image on the left is the bonding 2sσg while the image on the right is antibonding 2sσ*g. The contributing AO to both are the 2s orbitals on Carbon and Nitrogen and the produced MO are occupied.

2p Orbitals

The two images correspond to 5 and 6 on the orbital diagram and are degenerate. The contributing AOs to the produced MOs are the 2py and 2pz of both Nitrogen and Carbon. The produced MOs have the same symmetry labels and are bonding 1πu. Both MOs are occupied.

3s Orbital

The image shows the bonding 3sσg MO composed of the 2px AO of Carbon and Nitrogen. It is an occupied MO and corresponds to 7 in the orbital flow chart. This MO is higher in energy than 5 and 6 despite being a sigma bond. This is because the MO corresponding to 5 and 6 are the result of mixing and hence are lower in energy. This MO is also the HOMO.

References

  1. Cox, J.D.; Wagman, D.D.; Medvedev, V.A., CODATA Key Values for Thermodynamics, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1984, 1.