Jump to content

Rep:Mod:hys116

From ChemWiki

NH3

Summary

Molecule name = Ammonia, NH3

Calculation method = RB3LYP

Basis Set = 6-31G(d,p)

Final energy, E(RB3LYP) = -56.55776873 a.u

Point group = C3V

N-H bond distance = 1.01798 Å 

H-N-H bond angle = 105.74115°

The results obtained for bond length and angle are very close to the accepted values of 1.012 Å and 106.7° [1] showing that the results obtained from Gaussian are accurate.

NH3

Item table


         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES

Vibrations

From 3N-6 rule, ammonia is expected to have 3(4)-6 = 6 vibrational modes. Modes 2 and 3 are degenerate and modes 5 and 6 are also degenerate. Modes 1,2 and 3 are bends, 4,5 and 6 are stretches. Mode 4 is highly symmetric and mode 1 is known as the 'umbrella' mode. 2 bands would be expected in the experimental spectrum of ammonia.

Charges

The charge on the nitrogen molecule is -1.125 and the charge on each hydrogen is +0.375.This is as expected because nitrogen is more electronegative than fluorine so withdraws electrons and has a more negative charge.

Link to optimisation

The optimisation file is liked to here

N2

Summary

Molecule name = Nitrogen, N2

Calculation method = RB3LYP

Basis Set = 6-31G(d,p)

Final energy, E(RB3LYP) = -109.52412868 a.u

Point group = D∞h

N-N bond distance = 1.10550 Å 


The N-N bond length obtained is close to the accepted value of 1.158 Å [2] suggesting that the calculation is correct and the results obtained accurate.


N2

Item table

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES
 

Vibrations


There are no negative frequencies and no bands would be expected in the infrared spectrum as there is no change in dipole moment as nitrogen is homodinuclear.

Link to optimisation

The optimisation file is liked to here

H2

Summary

Molecule name = Hydrogen, H2

Calculation method = RB3LYP

Basis Set = 6-31G(d,p)

Final energy, E(RB3LYP) = -1.17853936 a.u

Point group = D∞h

H-H bond distance = 0.74279 Å 

The bond length obtained is close to the expected value of 0.74 Å [3] suggesting that the calculated bond length is accurate.

H2

Item table

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES


Vibrations


There are no negative frequencies and no expected bands in the experimental spectrum as there is no change in dipole moment as hydrogen is homodinuclear.

Link to optimisation

The optimisation file is liked to here

Haber-Bosch Process energy

E(NH3)= -56.55776873 a.u

2*E(NH3)= -113.1155375 a.u

E(N2)= -109.52412868 a.u

E(H2)= -1.17853936 a.u

3*E(H2)= -3.53561808 a.u

ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -0.0557907 a.u

= -146.4784829 kJ/mol

~ -146.48 kJ/mol

ΔE is negative therefore the reaction is exothermic and the ammonia product is more thermodynamically stable than the reactants.

Project molecule: ClF3

Summary

Molecule name = Chlorine trifluoride, ClF3

Calculation method = RB3LYP

Basis Set = 6-31G(d,p)

Final energy, E(RB3LYP) = -759.46531688 a.u

Point group = C2V

Cl-F bond distance = 1.72863 Å, 1.65143 Å

F-Cl-F bond angle = 87.14037°,174.28073°

Following VSEPR theory, ClF3 forms a T-shaped molecule as there are 2 lone pairs and 3 bonding pairs around the central atom. This results in 2 longer Cl-F bonds between the chlorine and the axial fluorines and one shorter bond with the equatorial fluorine. The bond angles are slightly less than 90° and 180° due to the lone pair repulsions.

ClF3

Item table


         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000050     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000028     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000204     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000134     0.001200     YES

Vibrations

From 3N-6 rule, ClF3 is expected to have 3(4)-6 = 6 vibrational modes. Modes 1 and 2 are degenerate. Modes 1,2 and 3 are bends, 4,5 and 6 are stretches. Modes 1, 4 and 5 are highly symmetric. 3 bands would be expected in the experimental spectrum of ClF3, from modes 1/2, 5 and 6.

Charges

The charge on the chlorine molecule is +1.225 and the charge on each fluorine is -0.454.This is as expected because fluorine is more electronegative than chlorine.

Molecular Orbitals

The energies of the molecular orbitals are shown here:


Molecular orbital 5, with energy -9.68 a.u is shown below:

The MO is made of the 2s bonding AO on Cl. It is a bonding MO. It is deep in energy as it is formed from the core AO on chlorine, not the valence AO and there is no overlap with other MOs, therefore this MO is not involved in bonding.


Molecular orbital 8, with energy -7.45 a.u is shown below:

This is the bonding MO made from the 2p AO on chlorine. It is perpendicular to the bonds so is a pi MO. MOs 6 and 7 have the same energy as 8; they are degenerate. This is beacuse they are formed from the 3 2p AOs in different planes (x,y,z). The MOs overlap; they are occupied and involved in bonding.


Molecular orbital 9, with energy -1.28 a.u is shown below:

This is a combination of the valence s AOs: the 3s on Cl and 23 on F. This is the bonding MO, where the bonding is so extensive that only one surface is seen. This explains why it is significantly higher in energy than the previous MOS.


Molecular orbital 11, with energy -1.17 a.u is shown below:

This is an antibonding orbital formed from the 2p AOs on F. There is no overlap between orbitals so these MOs are not involved in bonding.


Molecular orbital 12, with energy -0.89 a.u is shown below:

This is an antibonding MO formed from the 3p AO on Cl and the 2p AOs on F. There is no overlap so this MO is not involved in bonding

Link to Optimisation

The optimisation file is liked to here

References

  1. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 94th ed. http://www.hbcpnetbase.com. Page 9-26. Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  2. F. Liang et al. (2016), Nature Scientific Reports 6, 31559 http://www.nature.com/articles/srep31559#t1 Retrieved 7 March 2017.
  3. Bond Lengths and Energies http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c120/bondel.html Retrieved 7 March 2017.