Jump to content

Rep:Mod:huyi

From ChemWiki

NH3

Bond angle of the H-N-H

105.74115°

Bond length of the H-N bond

1.01798 Å (Literature value: 101 pm[1])

This value is closed to the literature and small amount of difference is negligible.

Key information on NH3

Molecule Name	        NH3
Calculation Type	FREQ
Calculation Method	RB3LYP
Basis Set	        6-31G(d,p)
Charge	                0
Spin	                Singlet
E(RB3LYP)	        -56.55776873	 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm	0.00000485	 a.u.
Imaginary Freq    	0
Dipole Moment    	1.8466	 Debye
Point Group	        C3V

"Item" section in the log file of NH3

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES
Predicted change in Energy=-5.986262D-10
Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.

A Jmol dynamic image of NH3

NH3 optimisation
A screeshot of the "Display Vibrations" window.

Download link:File:QIUNILE.LOG

Questions

How many modes do you expect from the 3N-6 rule?

6 modes as shown in the frequency analysis table.

which modes are degenerate (ie have the same energy)?

the 2rd and the 3rd, the 5th and the 6th as those two pairs have the similar frequency hence similar energy.

which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations?

Bending vibrations : Mode 1,2,3 because their frequencies are in the range of 1000-1600.

Stretching Vibrations: Mod 4,5,6 because their frequencies are approximately 3500.

which mode is highly symmetric?

Mode 4 as it has three symmetric planar.

one mode is known as the "umbrella" mode, which one is this?

Mode 1 due to "opening-umbrella motion".

how many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia?

2 bands. The rest of bands would be too small to be observed in an experimental spectrum.

The charge on the N-atom and H-atoms.

A screeshot of the "Display Charge Distribution" window.

N:-1.125 H:0.375

Negative charge is expected found on N atom and positive charges is expected found on H atoms.

As Nitrogen is a element with higher electronegativity than hydrogen, therefore electrons will be dragged further from hydrogen atoms.







N2

Bond length of the N-N bond

1.10550 Å (Literature value: 1.10 pm[1])

This optimized value is closed and small amount of difference is negligible.

Key information on n2

Molecule Name	                N2
Calculation Type	        FREQ
Calculation Method	        RB3LYP
Basis Set	                6-31G(D,P)
Charge	                        0
Spin	                        Singlet
Total Energy	                -109.52412868	 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm	        0.00000060	 a.u.
Imaginary Freq
Dipole Moment	                0.0000	 Debye
Point Group                     D∞h

"Item" section in the log file of H2

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES
Predicted change in Energy=-3.401082D-13
Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.

A Jmol dynamic image of N2

N2 optimisation

Frequency & Charges

2457.33, N2 is a linear molecule therefore due to 3N-5 rule only one mode would be observed.

Charges on both atoms are 0 because they have same electronegativity.

A screeshot of the "Display Vibrations" window.

Download link:File:DANQI.LOG










H2

Bond length of the N-N bond

0.74279 Å (literature value: 74 pm[1])

The optimized value is consistent with the literature value.

Key information on H2

Molecule Name	                H2
Calculation Type	        FREQ
Calculation Method	        RB3LYP
Basis Set	                6-31G(D,P)
Charge	                        0
Spin	                        Singlet
Total Energy	                -1.17853936	 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm	        0.00000017	 a.u.
Imaginary Freq
Dipole Moment	                0.0000	 Debye
Point Group                     D∞h

"Item" section in the log file of H2

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES
Predicted change in Energy=-1.164080D-13
Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.

A Jmol dynamic image of N2

H2 optimisation

Frequency & Charges

4465.68, H2 is a linear molecule therefore due to 3N-5 rule only one band would be observed.

Charges on both atoms are 0 because they have same electronegativity.

A screeshot of the "Display Vibrations of H2" window.

Download link:File:QINGQIDEZUIJIAHUA.LOG

Haber-Bosch process energy calculation

E(NH3)= -56.55776873 a.u. = -148492.421801 kJ/mol

2*E(NH3)= -113.11553746 a.u. = -296984.843601 kJ/mol

E(N2)= -109.52412868 a.u. = -287555.599849 kJ/mol

E(H2)= -1.17853936 a.u. = -3094.25508968 kJ/mol

3*E(H2)= -3.53561808 a.u. = -9282.76526904 kJ/mol

ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -0.0557907 a.u. = -146.47848285 kJ/mol

ΔE is a negative value hence this reaction is exothermic reaction and the product of the reaction is more stable.





Choice of small molecule Cl2

Bond length of the H-N bond

2.04174 Å (Literature value 1.99 pm)

This value is more different from the literature value than other elements. Possible explanation is the software used different method of optimization from the realistic condition or different methods of optimization should be applied to different elements.

Key information on Cl2

Molecule Name	                Cl2
Calculation Type	        FREQ
Calculation Method	        RB3LYP
Basis Set	                6-31G(d,p)
Charge	                        0
Spin	                        Singlet
E(RB3LYP)	                -920.34987886	 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm	        0.00002511	 a.u.
Imaginary Freq	                0
Dipole Moment	                0.0000	 Debye
Point Group	                D*H

"Item" section in the log file of Cl2

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000043     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000043     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000121     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000172     0.001200     YES
Predicted change in Energy=-5.277285D-09
Optimization completed.
   -- Stationary point found.

A Jmol dynamic image of Cl2

Cl2 optimisation

Download link:File:LVQI +1.LOG

Frequency & Charges

520.32, Cl2 is a linear molecule therefore due to 3N-5 rule only one band would be observed.

Charges on both atoms are 0 because they have same electronegativity.

A screeshot of the "Display Vibrations of Cl2" window.




Comments on the MOs

Snapshot of MO1
Snapshot of MO2

←Description of MO1 and MO2:

These two molecular orbitals of the Cl2 molecule have the highest energy hence they are in the HOMO or LUMO region. They are the occupied and antibonding combinations of the 3Px and 3Py orbitals, which are the anitbonding pi orbitals.








Snapshot of MO3
Snapshot of MO4
Snapshot of MO5

















←Description of MO3 and MO4:

These two molecular orbitals of the Cl2 molecule made of the 2Px and 2Pz atomic orbitals. Molecular orbitals of the combinations of the 2Pxs and 2Pys have the same energy and they are both antibonding orbitals. Combination of the 2Pzs has lower energy in the MO diagram due to the interaction between the AOs. They are all occupied and not in the HOMO/LUMO region.





















←Description of MO5:

This Molecular orbital is the pi orbital formed by either of 3Px or 3Py. It has lower energy than the HOMO/LUMO region and it is occupied. It is an bonding orbital as shown in the screenshot.



Reference [1]Huheey, pps. A-21 to A-34; T.L. Cottrell, "The Strengths of Chemical Bonds," 2nd ed., Butterworths, London, 1958; B. deB. Darwent, "National Standard Reference Data Series," National Bureau of Standards, No. 31, Washington, DC, 1970; S.W. Benson, J. Chem. Educ., 42, 502 (1965).