Jump to content

Rep:Mod:aquila

From ChemWiki

Sam's Computational Wiki Page Week 2

Investigating Aromaticity

The purpose of this project was to use the tools available through gaussian to study benzene and similar analogues to identify information about their molecular orbitals and charge distribution. Benzene and three analogues; boratabenzene, pyridinium and borazine were investigated in the same way, beginning with an optimisation of their geometry which was followed up with a frequency analysis to confirm that a minima had been found. Then a population analysis was run for each of the optimised structures to generate the molecular orbitals and to allow for NBO analysis to be performed. An MO diagram was constructed for Benzene. All calculations were performed on the HPC

Benzene

Optimisation

Successful Benzene Optimisation Results Summary
File Type .log
Calculation Type FOPT
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Energy -232.25820551 a.u.
Gradient 0.00009549 a.u.
Dipole Moment 0.0001 Debye
Point Group C1
Calculation time 00:02:03:100*
  • Time Format: hh:mm:ss:msmsms

Successful Convergence of Benzene Optimisation

Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000212     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000085     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000991     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000315     0.001200     YES

Link to file for Benzene optimisation on the D-spaceDOI:10042/22884

Frequency Analysis

Link to File published on d-space for frequency analysis of benzene DOI:10042/22885

Results of the Successful Frequency analysis of Benzene are shown below

Benzene Frequency Analysis Results Summary
File Type .log
Calculation Type FREQ
Basis Set 6-31G d,p
Energy -232.25820298
Gradient 0.00009245
Dipole Moment 0.0001 Debye
Point Group C1
Calculation time 00:11:23:100

Successful convergence of Benzene frequency analysis

      Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000190     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000092     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000971     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000372     0.001200     YES


Low frequencies are within acceptible limits and there are no negative frequencies

Low frequencies ---  -15.5663  -14.5022  -13.9318   -0.0004    0.0002    0.0003
Low frequencies ---  414.0684  414.1453  620.9624
Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering
activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized
incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),
and normal coordinates:
                    1                      2                      3
                    A                      A                      A
Frequencies --   414.0683               414.1453               620.9624
Red. masses --     2.9400                 2.9392                 6.0697
Frc consts  --     0.2970                 0.2970                 1.3790
IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0000                 0.0000

It was found that if symmetry of Benzene was restricted to D6h for the frequency analysis, no vibrations would be displayed in the log file. to get around this the symmetry wasn't restricted which had the disadvantage of the symmetry labels of the vibrations not being correct, as C1 symmetry was adopted and only one symmetry label, A, exists for that point group. The vibrations of benzene are listed in the table below.

Vibration Modes of Benzene
Mode no. Form of Vibration Frequency Intensity Symmetry Label
1 Symmetric out of plane bending vibration. Carbon atoms at 1 and 4 positions move, in a concerted fashion, back and forth across the plane of the ring 414.07 0.000
2 Asymmetric, out of plane bending vibration. Carbon atoms at 2, 3, 5 and 6 positions move back and forth across the plane of the ring. Atoms 2 and 5 remain on same side of the ring to and atoms 3 and 6 remain on the opposite side 414.15 0.000
3 620.96 0.000
4 620.97 0.000
5 Symmetric, out of plane C-H bending. All hydrogen atoms move back and forth across the plane of the ring in a concerted fashion 693.05 74.2466
6 718.31 0.000
7 864.10 0.000
8 864.17 0.000
9 973.64 0.000
10 973.73 0.000
11 1012.37 0.000
12 1017.88 0.000
13 1019.95 0.000
14 In plane, C- H symmetric bending vibration. Hydrogen atoms bonded at the 2, 3, 5 ad 6 positions move back and forth in the plane of the ring towards the carbon atoms at the 1 and 4 positions 1066.34 3.3969
15 In plane bending vibration, bond between C2 and C3 and the bond between C5 and C6 relax and contract antagonistically causing a bend in the ring 1066.43 3.3997
16 1179.25 0.000
17 1202.17 0.000
18 1202.28 0.000
19 1356.09 0.000
20 1380.24 0.000
21 In plane bending vibration, bond between carbon atoms 2 and 3 and the bond between 5 and 6 remain fixed whilst the 4 bonds can be split in to antagonistic pairs where in the vibration motion one pair is contracting and the other is relaxing. The hydrogen atoms at the 2, 3, 5 and 6 positions move in a concerted fashion towards the pair of carbon bonds that are relaxing 1524.35 6.6222
22 In plane Bending Vibration. Bonds between carbon atoms 2 and 3 and 5 and 6 contract and relax anatgonistically whilst the other CC bonds remain approximately fixed in length. Gives rise to bending of the ring. All hydrogen atoms move towards the carbon-carbon bond that is contracting during the vibration. 1524.43 6.6173
23 1653.03 0.000
24 1653.15 0.000
25 Stretching vibration, hydrogen atoms stretch and contract antagonistically. Hydrogen atoms at 1, 3 and 5 positions move in unison and antagonise hydrogen atoms at the 2, 4 and 6 positions. Some slight bending of the ring also occurs 3174.34 0.0013
26 3183.81 0.0001
27 3183,99 0.0001
28 Stretching vibration. All six hydrogen atoms undergo stretching and can be grouped in to different categories. Atoms 1, 2 and 6 antagonise atoms 3, 4, and 5. However the bonds to hydrogens atoms 1 and 4 undergo noticebly greater bond stretching and so the speed at which they oscillate is greater than that of the atoms dispite reaching the limits of the stretch/contraction at the same time as the other hydrogen atoms. Some minor ring bending also occurs 3199.48 46.5815
29 Asymmetric Stretching vibration. Hydrogen atoms 2 and 3 antagonise atoms 5 and 6, stretching as the other C-H bonds contract. A minimal amount of stretching is observed for hydrogen atoms 1 and 4 and there is noticeable ring bending. 3199.65 46.5253
30 3210.15 0.0003

Population Analysis

Molecular Orbital Diagram of benzene, orbitals 7 to 30
Molecular Orbital Diagram of benzene, orbitals 7 to 30

Link to file published on D-space for Benzene population Analysis DOI:10042/22905

Charge distribution of benzene
Charge distribution of benzene

A population analysis of benzene was then performed on the optimised benzene structure, using the formtatted checkpoint file outputted by the HPC. Before performing the population analysis D6h symmetry was enforced and the keyword "pop=full" was used in setting up the calculation. Natural bond orbital analysis performed using the .log output showed small differences in charge between the carbon and hydrogen atoms, as indicaed in the dark red and green shades used to colour the atoms in the picture right with brighter shades indicated more highly charged atoms. A fixed colour range from -1.00 to 1.00 was used. The specific charges on the atoms were +0.239 on hydrogen and -0.239 on the carbon atoms.

A later test run of the frequency analysis showed that when D6h symmetry was enforced, the frequency analysis fails to produce the desired vibrations

Boratabenzene

Optimisation

Link to published file on D-space for Boratabenzene optimisation DOI:10042/22886

Results for Boratabenzene optimisation

Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000159     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000069     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000878     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000326     0.001200     YES

Convergence successful

Boratabenzene Optimisation Results Summary
File Type .log
Calculation Type FOPT
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G d,p
Energy -219.02052984 a.u.
Gradient 0.00015840
Dipole Moment 2.8465 Debye
Point Group C1
Calculation Time 00:03:58:700

Frequency Analysis

Link to published file on D-space for Boratabenzene frequency anaylsis DOI:10042/22882

Boratabenzene Frequency Analysis Results Summary
File Type .log
Calculation Type FOPT
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G d,p
Energy 219.02052210 a.u.
Gradient 0.00017656 a.u.
Dipole Moment 2.85 Debye
Point Group C2v
Calculation Time 00:05:46:5
        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000437     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000157     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000854     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000386     0.001200     YES
Predicted change in Energy=-7.082350D-07
Optimization completed.
   -- Stationary point found.

Frequency Analysis Successfully Converged

Low frequencies --- -6.8690 -0.0007 -0.0004 -0.0003 3.2436 5.5846

Low frequencies ---  371.2620  404.4986  565.1651
Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering
activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized
incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),
and normal coordinates:
                    1                      2                      3
                    A                      A                      A
Frequencies --   371.2620               404.4985               565.1651
Red. masses --     2.6899                 3.2177                 5.7690
Frc consts  --     0.2184                 0.3102                 1.0857
IR Inten    --     2.2987                 0.0000                 0.1564

Low frequencies are within acceptable limits and there are no negative frequencies.

Population Analysis

Link to file published on D-space for Boratabenzene population analysis DOI:10042/22808



Pyridinium

Optimisiation

Link to file published to D-space for Pyridinium optimisation DOI:10042/22806

    Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000065     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000023     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000826     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000176     0.001200     YES

Convergence Successful

Pyridinium Optimisation Results Summary
File Type .log
Calculation Type FOPT
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G d,p
Energy -248.66807396 a.u.
Gradient 0.00003894 a.u.
Dipole Moment 1.8727 Debye
Point Group C1
Calculation Time 00:04:00:5


Frequency Analysis

Link to file published to D-space for Pyridinium frequency analysis DOI:10042/22784

Pyridinium Frequency Analysis Results Summary
File Type .log
Calculation Type FREQ
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G d,p
Energy -248.66806065 a.u.
Gradient 0.00008670
Dipole Moment 1.8719 Debye
Point Group C2v
Calculation time 00:05:38:5


        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000242     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000087     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.001176     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000387     0.001200     YES

Frequency Analysis Convergence Successful


Low frequencies ---  -10.6391   -9.6790    0.0007    0.0010    0.0011    9.8078
Low frequencies ---  392.1034  404.1191  620.2636
Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering
activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized
incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),
and normal coordinates:
                    1                      2                      3
                   B1                     A2                     A1
Frequencies --   392.1034               404.1191               620.2636
Red. masses --     2.9456                 2.7465                 6.2546
Frc consts  --     0.2668                 0.2643                 1.4178
IR Inten    --     0.9913                 0.0000                 0.0145
 

Low frequencies within acceptable limits and there are no negative frequencies

Population Analysis

Link to file published to D-space for Pyridinium population analysis DOI:10042/22804


Borazine

Optimisation

Link to file on D-space for Borazine Optimisation DOI:10042/22783

 Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000057     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000017     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000748     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000201     0.001200     YES

Successful Convergence

Borazine Optimisation Results Summary
File Type .log
Calculation Type FOPT
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G d,p
Energy -242.68458998 a.u.
Gradient 0.00002129 a.u.
Dipole Moment 0.0006 Dipole
Point Group C1
Calculation time 00:11:15:5

Frequency Analysis

Link to file published on D-space for frequency analysis of Borazine DOI:10042/22782

Borazine Frequency Analysis Results Summary
File Type .log
Calculation Type FREQ
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G d,p
Energy -242.68459825 a.u.
Gradient 0.00001386 a.u.
Dipole Moment 0.0006
Point Group C1
Calculation Time 00:11:25:3
Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
Maximum Force            0.000036     0.000450     YES
RMS     Force            0.000014     0.000300     YES
Maximum Displacement     0.000648     0.001800     YES
RMS     Displacement     0.000251     0.001200     YES
Low frequencies ---   -7.3827   -6.4681   -5.8389   -0.0009   -0.0006    0.0005
Low frequencies ---  289.4766  289.6115  404.4214
Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering
activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized
incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),
and normal coordinates:
                    1                      2                      3
                    A                      A                      A
Frequencies --   289.4766               289.6114               404.4214
Red. masses --     2.9270                 2.9269                 1.9273
Frc consts  --     0.1445                 0.1446                 0.1857
IR Inten    --     0.0000                 0.0000                23.5969

Low Frequencies are within acceptable limits and no negative frequencies were observed

Population Analysis

Link to file published to D-space for population analysis of Borazine DOI:10042/22881


Comparison of Molecular Orbitals

Comparison of molecular orbitals across Benzene analogues
Benzene Boratabenzene Pyridinium Borazine
Structures
Structure of Benzene
Structure of Benzene
Structure of Boratabenzene
Structure of Boratabenzene
Structure of Pyridinium
Structure of Pyridinium
Structure of Borazine
Structure of Borazine
Orbital 16
Orbital number 16 of Benzene
Orbital number 16 of Benzene
centre Orbital number 16 of Boratabenzene
Orbital number 16 of Pyridinium
Orbital number 16 of Pyridinium
Orbital number 16 of Borazine
Orbital number 16 of Borazine
Comments carbon atoms at 1 and 4 positions do not contribute to the orbital, no electron density covers the ipso and para hydrogens Lobe overlaps the ortho and ipso hydrogens and lobe of opposite phase on the para hydrogen. Leaving the meta hydrogens with no electron density surrounding them. Result is a less symmetric orbital when compared with benzene orbital 16 For pyridinium the nitrogen atom doesn't contribute any electron density but the orbital lobes appear distorterd in comparison with benzene. The central red and green lobes don't extend as far across the ring and the lobes surrounding them extend further, coming in to close contact at the number 4 carbon A drastically different orbital is observed for borazine at the 16th level. σ p-s type bonding is observed between boron atoms and their bound hydrogen. Where as the nitrogen atoms appear to only undergo s-s type σ bonding, and the orbitals involving nitrogen are markedly more contracted than those oberved for boron atoms
Orbital 19
Orbital 19 of Benzene
Orbital 19 of Benzene
Orbital 19 of Boratabenzene
Orbital 19 of Boratabenzene
Orbital 19 of Pyridinium
Orbital 19 of Pyridinium
Orbital 10 of Borazine
Orbital 10 of Borazine
Comments Shows close similarity with orbital 18 of Benzene that has degeneracy with orbital 19. However in benzene there are nodes in between orbital lobes that are not observed for Boratabenzene Close comparison to orbital 19 of benzene, noticeable differences are that the lobe encompassing the ipso hydrogen is more contracted than in benzene and the lobe encompassing the para hydrogen is more diffuse in comparison with benzene Comparible with orbital 19 of boratabenzene in terms of shape. Lobes surrounding the ortho hydrogen atoms are considerably large in borazine and the size of the lobes surrounding the meta hydrogens is lessened
Orbital 21
Orbital 21 of Benzene
Orbital 21 of Benzene
Orbital 21 of Boratabenzene
Orbital 21 of Boratabenzene
Orbital 21 of Pyridinium
Orbital 21 of Pyridinium
Orbital 21 of Borazine
Orbital 21 of Borazine
Comments Different lobes of the π system are equal in size The presence of the boron atom appears to have made the lobe of the molecular orbital it contributes to more diffuse For pyridinium the no 21 orbital is similar in shape as the degenerate orbital no 20 for benzene. The nitrogen atom does not contribute to this orbital so there is no distortion of the orbital lobes For borazine, the lobes covering the single nitrogen atom and two boron atoms is noticeably smaller than the lobes covering the two nitrogen atoms and single boron atom

Natural Bonding Orbital Analysis

The combined population analyses allowed for a comparison of the charge distribution on the atoms at each position of the benzene analogues and therefore determine the influence of the substituted atoms.

Comparison of the Charge distribution about the aforementioned benzene analogues
Benzene Boratabenzene Pyridinium Borazine
Molecule image
Image of benzene
Image of benzene
Image of boratabenzene
Image of boratabenzene
Image of pyridinium
Image of pyridinium
Image of borazine
Image of borazine
Charge distribution (red = negative, green = positive. light shades = high charge)
Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Image of charge distribution around benzene
Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Image of charge distribution around boratabenzene
Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Image of charge distribution around pyridinium
Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Image of charge distribution around borazine
Numbered charge structures
Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Effective charges on atoms in benzene
Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Effective charges on atoms in boratabenzene
Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Effective charges on atoms in pydridinium
Error creating thumbnail: File with dimensions greater than 12.5 MP
Effetcive charges on atoms in Borazine
Values C1: -0.239, C2: -0.239, C3: -0.239, C4: -0.239, C5: -0.239, C6: -0.239. H1: +0.239, H2: +0.239, H3: +0.239, H4: +0.239, H5: +0.239, H6: +0.239. B1: +0.202, C2: -0.588, C3:-0.250, C4:-0.340, C5:-0.250, C6:-0.588. H1:-0.095, H2:+0.184, H3:+0.179, H4:+0.186, H5:+0.179, H6:+0.184. N1: -0.476, C2: +0.071, C3: -0.241, C4:-0.122, C5:-0.241, C6:+0.071. H1:+0.483. H2+0.285, H3:+0.297, H4:+0.292, H5:+0.297, H6:+0.285. N1: -1.102, B2:+0.747, N3:-1.102, B4:+0.747, N5:-1.102, B6:+0.747. H1:+0.432, H2:-0.077, H3:+0.432, H4:-0.077, H5:+0.432, H6:-0.077

Interpretation of Charge Data

Due to the high level of symmetry in benzene the charges across all the carbon atoms are the same, -0.239, and the same across all the hydrogen atoms, +0.239, giving a total charge of 0 as is expected for a typically neutral molecule. Benzene will be used as a reference in describing the influence of the different elements substituted in to the ring in the Benzene analogues

In boratabenzene the presence of the boron atom increases the electron density of all the carbon atoms and hydrogen atoms in the molecule, relative to benzene. Charge is localised most on the carbon atoms at the 2, 6 positions, with the effective charge (-0.588), over double that seen for the carbon atoms in benzene. Carbon atom at the 4 position also has a significantly greater electron density, with a charge of -0.340, than that observed in benzene. This can be account for by boron's lower electronegativity than carbon and so electron density on boron can be easily drawn away by the carbon atoms through the π-bonding system. The explanation as to why the carbon atoms at the 2,4 and 6 positions can be shown through resonance. See image below

resonance forms of boratabenzene
resonance forms of boratabenzene

Hydrogen also has a greater electronegativity than boron and so likely draws some electron density from the ring through an inductive effect, as the positive charge on the hydrogen atoms bound to carbon atoms is lessened, in comparison to benzene.

The optimised structure of boratabenzene shows that there is no π delocalisation over the boron atom. The significant negative charge over all the carbon atoms, equivalent to two formal negative charges, in the ring might suggest that there is very little π electron density between the boron atoms and adjacent carbon atoms. The carbon atoms draw so much of the electron density, by nature of having greater electronegativity, from the boron atom that there is insufficient electron density for any strong п-bonding interaction, hence why there is no delocalisation of the π system over the boron atom.

For Pydridinium, the nitrogen atom has the opposite effect of boron in boratabenzene. The nitrogen atom withdraws electron density from the ring due to its greater electronegativity than carbon. The carbon atoms at the 2,4 and 6 positions experience a noticeable increase in positive charge with the carbon atoms adjacent to the nitrogen experiencing the greatest loss of electron density with charges of +0.071. Surprisingly the carbon atoms at the 3 and 5 positions have a marginally higher negative charge, than in benzene, of -0.241. The hydrogen atoms experience an increase in positive charge, but not as great as the carbon atoms. An explanation of charges can be shown through resonance structures, see image below. The hydrogen atom bonded directly to the nitrogen atom experiences a large increase in positive charge, as would be expected.

Resonance structures of pyridinium
Resonance structures of pyridinium

Unlike boratabenzene, pyridinium shows complete delocalisation around the entire ring. This might be due to the heteroatom being more electronegative than the carbon atoms in the ring in this case and so the carbon atoms are unable to draw π electron density away from the heteroatom. There is significant electron density located at the nitrogen but with its electronegativity and carbon's being close, electrons from nitrogen are likely to delocalised in the ring to some extent, creating an aromatic structure.

In borazine the nitrogen atoms are bonded to atoms that are all less electronegative than they are, so they experience a very large increase in electron density greater than a single formal negative charge (-1.102). The boron atoms are surrounded by atoms that are all more electronegative than it and so experiences a very large loss in electron density. However the electronegativities of hydrogen and boron are quite close, so the increase in charge is not as great in magnitude as that the charge obtained by the nitrogen atoms.

Despite being labelled 'inorganic benzene' the optimised borazine strucure shows no delocalisation, despite being isoelectronic with benzene, having the same number of π electrons and uniform bond lengths for all N-B bonds. This might be because the π electrons are located on the nitrogen atoms and delocalisation of these electrons would involve donation of these electrons to form the π bonds. This would be energetically unfavourable considering the large difference in electronegativity between nitrogen and boron, the nitrogen atoms would be reluctant to lose electron density and attain a positive charge in order to achieve aromaticity. The stabilisation energy obtained from aromaticity would likely be outweighed by the destabilisation resulting from the negative charge on the boron atoms and the positive charge on the nitrogen atoms. It would be more likely that the most electronic structure is for electron density remain on the nitrogen atoms, as is evident from the charge distribution data.