Jump to content

Rep:Mod:Rickiezhang

From ChemWiki

NH3 Molecule

Molecule Summary

Molecule NH3
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
Final Energy -56.55776873 au
RMS Gradient 0.00000485
Point Group C3V
N-H Bond Length 1.01798 Å 
H-N-H Bond Angle 105.741°

Item Table


         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES


Jmol and Optimisation file

NH3 molecule


NH3 Optimisation File

Vibrations of the molecule

We expect 6 modes from the 3N-6 rule where N is the number of atoms in the molecule. (In this case 4)

There are 2 degenerate modes at frequencies of 1693.95 (Modes 2 and 3) and 3589.82 (Modes 5 and 6).

The bending modes are 1,2 and 3 and the stretching modes are 4,5 and 6.

Mode 4 is highly symmetrical.

Mode 1 is the umbrella mode.

Since there are 2 pairs of degenerate modes we would expect to see 4 bands in the experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia but, we only see 2 bands as the modes 4,5 and 6 are too low in infra-red intensity to be seen in the spectrum.

There are no negative frequencies, which shows that the molecule is fully optimised.

Charges on the molecule

We can see that Nitrogen contains a -1.125 charge and the Hydrogens have a charge of 0.375.

This is expected as Nitrogen is a very electronegative element so is electron withdrawing creating a more negative charge on itself, as a result the Hydrogens bear a positive charge.

N2

Molecule Summary

Molecule N2
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
Final Energy -109.52412868 au
RMS Gradient 0.00000060
Point Group D*H
N-N Bond Length 1.10550 Å 
N-N Bond Angle 180°

Item Table


        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES

Jmol and Optimisation file

N2 molecule


N2 Optimisation File

Vibrations of the Molecule

This molecule is fully optimised as there are no negative frequencies.

We use the 3N-5 rule as this is a linear molecule which gives us 1 expected mode as shown in the table.

The mode is a stretching mode that is symmetrical.

There is no dipole-dipole moment so no band would be seen in the spectrum of N2.

H2

Molecule Summary

Molecule H2
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
Final Energy -1.17853936 au
RMS Gradient 0.00000017
Point Group D*H
H-H Bond Length 0.74279 Å 
H-H Bond Angle 180°

Item Table


         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES

Jmol and Optimisation file

H2 molecule

H2 Optimisation File

Vibrations of the Molecule

There is no negative frequencies for H2 showing it has been fully optimised.

There is one mode shown that is a symmetrical stretching mode as predicted from the 3N-5 rule.

The infra-red frequency is 0 showing that there is no dipole-dipole moment for a band to be seen in the spectrum of H2.

Haber-Bosch process energy calculation

E(NH3)= -56.55776873 au

2*E(NH3)= -113.1155375 au

E(N2)= -109.52412868 au

E(H2)= -1.17853936 au

3*E(H2)= -3.53561808 au

ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -0.05579074 au

ΔE= -146.48 KJ/mol

The ammonia product is more stable because the reaction is exothermic which results in a decrease in energy from the reactants to the product.

ClF Molecule

Molecule Summary

Molecule ClF
Calculation Method RB3LYP
Basis Set 6-31G(d,p)
Final Energy -559.94269578 au
RMS Gradient 0.00014211
Point Group C*V
Cl-F Bond Length 1.66434 Å 
Cl-F Bond Angle 180°

The bond length of ClF calculated isn't identical to the literature value of 1.628[1] but the difference is within experimental error.

Item Table

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000246     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000246     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000433     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000613     0.001200     YES

Jmol and Optimisation file

ClF molecule

ClF Optimisation File

Vibrations of the Molecule

The 3N-5 rule predicts one mode for the CLF molecule.

This modes is seen to be a stretching mode with the Fluorine atom stretching more than the Chlorine atom probably due to the fact that Fluorine is much lighter.

We would expect to see 1 band in an experimental spectrum of gaseous ClF.

Charge on the Molecule

The Fluorine atom has a charge of -0.309 and the Chlorine atom has a charge of 0.309.

This is as expected as Fluorine is more electronegative so would be more electron withdrawing and hence develop a relative negative charge while the Chlorine being less electronegative will have a relative positive charge.

Molecular Orbitals

MO 1 with energy of -101.63074 au

This is an occupied non-bonding orbital made up of the 1s of Fluorine. This is the lowest energy MO and is deep in energy.

MO 4 with energy of -7.31069 au MO 6 with energy of -7.29213 au

These are occupied non-bonding orbitals made up of the 2p orbitals of Chlorine. From the energies of the MOs we can deduce that MO 4,5 and 6 are degenerate.

MO 7 with energy of -1.21864 au

This is an occupied sigma bonding orbital formed from the constructive overlap of the 2s of Fluorine and the 3s of Chlorine. This forms a bonding and anti-bonding pair with MO 8 which both are involved in bonding. We can see that the Fluorine atom contributes more to bonding than the Chlorine atom since it is more electronegative and hence deeper in energy. Electronegative atoms such as Fluorine contribute more to bonding MOs and contribute less to anti-bonding MOs.

MO 8 with energy of -0.83311 au

This is an occupied sigma anti-bonding orbital formed from the destructive overlap of the 2s of Fluorine and the 3s of Chlorine. There is more Cl character in this MO as the less electronegative atom, in this case Chlorine, contributes more to anti-bonding MOs.

MO 9 with energy of -0.52314 au

This is an occupied sigma bonding orbital formed from the constructive overlap of the 2p of Fluorine and the 3p of Chlorine. This is a bonding and anti-bonding pair with MO 14.

MO 10 with energy of -0.46713 au

This is an occupied pi bonding orbital formed from the constructive overlap of the 2p of Fluorine and the 3p of Chlorine. This MO has degenerate energy with MO 11. This is a bonding and anti-bonding quadruplet along with MO 11, 12 and 13 which are all involved in bonding.

MO 12 with energy of -0.32855 au

This is an occupied pi anti-bonding orbital formed from the destructive overlap of the 2p of Fluorine and the 3p of Chlorine. This has degenerate energy with MO 13. This is one of the HOMOs along with MO 13.

MO 14 with energy of -0.12150 au

This is an unoccupied sigma anti-bonding orbital formed from the destructive overlap of the 2p of Fluorine and the 3p of Chlorine. This is the LUMO of the molecule and is relatively high in energy.

References