Rep:Mod:NBCPHY
Optimizing the Reactants and Products
| Name | anti-1 | gauche-1 | anti-2 | anti-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | ||||
| Calculation type | FOPT | FOPT | FOPT | FOPT |
| Calculation Method | RHF | RHF | RHF | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 3-21G | 3-21G | 3-21G | 6-31G(d) |
| Point Group | C1 | C2 | Ci | Ci |
| Energy/ a.u. | -231.69097054 | -231.68771610 | -231.69253528 | -234.61171035 |
| .log File | here | here | here | here |
Anti-1 conformer has a lower energy compared to that of gauche-1 conformer, therefore it is more stable. This is because anti-1 adopted antiperiplanar conformation for the four central carbon atoms, two alkene groups are far apart so there is less steric interactions between them.
Based on the description above, a conformer in antiperiplanar conformation should be lower in energy. The lowest energy conformation of 1,5-hexadiene is predicted to be anti-2 conformer. Because the two alkene groups are heading toward opposite direction, steric interaction between two groups is expected to be the minimum. Final energy of anti-2 conformer given in the appendix table is -231.69254 a.u., which is the same as experimental value (-231.69253528 a.u.), considering only 5 decimal places are given in the appendix table.
| Structure | |
|---|---|
| Calculation type | FREQ |
| Calculation Method | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 6-31G(d) |
| Point Group | Ci |
| Energy/ a.u. | -234.61171035 |
| Sum of electronic and zero-point energies | 234.469204 |
| Sum of electronic and thermal energies | 234.461857 |
| Sum of electronic and thermal enthalpies | 234.460913 |
| Sum of electronic and thermal free energies | 234.500777 |
| .log File | here |
Optimizing the "Chair" and "Boat" Transition Structures
Chair and Boat T.S.
| Method | Hessian | Frozen coordinate method (Bond) | Frozen coordinate method (Derivative) | TS (QST2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | ||||
| Calculation type | FREQ | FREQ | FREQ | FREQ |
| Calculation Method | RHF | RHF | RHF | RHF |
| Basis Set | 3-21G | 3-21G | 3-21G | 3-21G |
| Point Group | C2h | C2h | C2h | C2v |
| Energy/ a.u. | -231.61932208 | -231.61518535 | -231.61932232 | -231.60280222 |
| Transition bond distances/ Å | 2.02 | 2.20 | 2.02 | 2.14 |
| .log File | here | here | here | here |

As it can be seen on the left, Hessian method gives an imaginary frequency of 818 cm-1 and the vibration corresponding to the Cope rearrangement of 1,5-hexadiene.
For chair transition structure of 1,5-hexadiene, both of the Hessian and the frozen coordinate methods give the same bond forming/breaking bond lengths of 2.02 Å. It worked in both ways in this case because of the reasonable assumption for transition structure geometry. However, if it is a more complex molecule, it'll be difficult to predict its transition structure using the Hessian method (deviation of curvature are larger), which makes the frozen coordinate method a more ideal choice.

QST2 method was used to find the boat transition structure, vibration corresponding to the only imaginary frequency (840 cm-1) is visualized.
IRC Method
In this step, reaction coordinate is computed in the forward direction only because of its symmetry, also, the number of points along the IRC is set to 50. A normal minimization (HF/3-21G) is carried out after IRC. The following result is obtained for chair structure.
| Structure | ||
|---|---|---|
| Calculation type | FREQ | FOPT |
| Calculation Method | RHF | RHF |
| Basis Set | 3-21G | 3-21G |
| Point Group | C2 | C2 |
| Energy/ a.u. | -231.69157819 | -231.69166702 |
| .log File | here | here |
Reoptimize Boat and Chair T.S.
Both chair and boat structures are reoptimized using B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory, giving the table below.
| Structure | ||
|---|---|---|
| Calculation type | FREQ | FREQ |
| Calculation Method | RB3LYP | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 6-31G(d) | 6-31G(d) |
| Point Group | C2h | C2v |
| Energy/ a.u. | -234.55698249 | -234.54309287 |
| .log File | here | here |
Energies
| HF/3-21G | HF/6-31G* | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic Energy | Sum of Electronic and Zero-point Energies | Sum of Electronic and Thermal Energies | .log file | Electronic Energy | Sum of Electronic and Zero-point Energies | Sum of Electronic and Thermal Energies | .log file | |
| at 0 K | at 298.15 K | at 0 K | at 298.15 K | |||||
| Chair T.S. | -231.619322 | -231.466705 | -231.461346 | here | -234.556982 | -234.414934 | -234.409011 | here |
| Boat T.S. | -231.602802 | -231.450930 | -231.445302 | here | -234.543093 | -234.402345 | -234.396011 | here |
| Reactant (anti2) | -231.692535 | -231.539540 | -231.532566 | here | -234.611710 | -234.469204 | -234.461857 | here |
| HF/3-21G | HF/3-21G | B3LYP/6-31G* | B3LYP/6-31G* | Expt. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| at 0 K | at 298.15 K | at 0 K | at 298.15 K | at 0 K | |
| ΔE (Chair) | 45.70 | 44.69 | 34.05 | 33.16 | 33.5 ± 0.5 |
| ΔE (Boat) | 55.60 | 54.76 | 41.95 | 41.32 | 44.7 ± 2.0 |
The Diels Alder Cycloaddition
Cis-butadiene
| Structure | |
|---|---|
| HOMO | |
| LUMO | |
| Calculation type | FREQ |
| Calculation Method | RAM1 |
| Basis Set | ZDO |
| Point Group | C2v |
| Energy/ a.u. | 0.04879770 |
| .log File | here |
Ethylene+Cis-butadiene Transition Structure
| Structure | |
|---|---|
| HOMO | |
| LUMO | |
| Calculation type | FREQ |
| Calculation Method | RAM1 |
| Basis Set | ZDO |
| Point Group | C1 |
| Energy/ Hartree | 0.11165476 |
| Sum of electronic and zero-point energies /Hartree | 0.253276 |
| Sum of electronic and thermal energies /Hartree | 0.259453 |
| Sum of electronic and thermal enthalpies /Hartree | 0.260397 |
| Sum of electronic and thermal free energies /Hartree | 0.224016 |
| Partly formed σ C-C bond lengths /Å | 2.12 |
| .log File | here |


Typical sp3 and sp2 C-C bond lengths 1.51 Å [1]
Van der Waals radius of the C atom:1.70 Å [2]
Partly formed σ C-C bond lengths in the transition state (2.12 Å) is shorter than two Van der Waals radius of C atoms combined (3.4 Å), indicating the presence of interaction in the transition state between two carbon atoms. However, partly formed σ C-C bond length is longer than a typical sp3 and sp2 C-C bond length (1.51 Å), which means there is no bond formed yet between two carbon atoms.
As it can be seen on the right, the formation of the two bonds is synchronous at the imaginary frequency of -956 cm-1. The blue arrows in the graph represent displacement vectors. It is obvious that the formation of the two bonds is asynchronous at the lowest positive frequency of 147 cm-1. This is because only the imaginary frequency (a negative value) corresponds to the minimum energy of transition state.
HOMO of the transition structure is anti-symmetric, which is formed by two anti-symmetric orbitals. Therefore the HOMO of butadiene and LUMO of ethylene are used to form this orbital, because they are all anti-symmetric. Reaction is allowed because HOMO of butadiene and LUMO of ethylene have the same symmetry property (anti-symmetric), there is a significant overlap density.
Regioselectivity Study of Diels-Alder Reaction
| Endo | Exo | |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | ||
| HOMO | ||
| LUMO | ||
| Calculation type | FREQ | FREQ |
| Calculation Method | RAM1 | RAM1 |
| Basis Set | ZDO | ZDO |
| Point Group | CS | CS |
| Energy/ a.u. | -0.05150480 | -0.05041984 |
| Relative Energy /kcal/mol | 0 | 0.68 |
| .log File | here | here |
Endo structure is formed when the maleic anhydride molecule is faced toward the cyclohexa-1,3-diene, exo is formed when maleic anhydride molecule is faced away from cyclohexa-1,3-diene. Endo structure is favored because there are less steric interactions between -(C=O)-O-(C=O)- fragment and the remainder of the system. Secondary orbital overlap effect is another reason for the tendency to form endo structure. It can be seen on the diagram that there are through-space bonding interactions between -(C=O)-O-(C=O)- fragment and the remainder of the system in the HOMO of endo structure, but there are no such interactions in HOMO of exo structure.
Further Study
What effects have been neglected in these calculations of Diels Alder transition states?
AM1 belongs to Zero Differential Overlap (ZDO) method, in which electrons involving two-center charge distributions are neglected. [3]
In order to obtain a more accurate approximation of transition structures, the endo and exo structures are reoptimised using B3LYP/6-31G(d) method, and the following result is obtained.
| Endo | Exo | |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | ||
| Calculation type | FREQ | FREQ |
| Calculation Method | RB3LYP | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 6-31G(d) | 6-31G(d) |
| Energy/ a.u. | -612.68339673 | -612.67931096 |
| Relative Energy /kcal/mol | 0 | 2.56 |
| .log File | here | here |
References
- ↑ G.D. Zhou, Fundamentals of Structural Chemistry, 1993, 222.
- ↑ A. Bondi, "Van der Waals Volumes and Radii". THE JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1964, 68, 443. DOI:10.1021/j100785a001
- ↑ http://www.cup.uni-muenchen.de/ch/compchem/energy/semi1.html