Jump to content

Rep:Mod:LJK27

From ChemWiki

BH3

Calculation Method: B3LYP Basis set: 3-21G

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000217     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000105     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000919     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000441     0.001200     YES

Calculation method: B3LYP Basis set: 6-31G

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000203     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000098     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000867     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000415     0.001200     YES

 Low frequencies ---   -0.2260   -0.1035   -0.0054   48.0278   49.0875   49.0880
 Low frequencies --- 1163.7224 1213.6715 1213.6741

The frequencies are outside the 15 cm-1 range but this was discussed with a demonstrator and deemed fine as the calculation converged.

BH3

File:LARA BH3 FREQ.LOG

IR Spectrum for BH3

Vibrations (cm-1) Intensity (arbitrary units) Symmetry IR active? Type
1164 92 A2" Yes Bend
1214 14 E' Very slight Bend
1214 14 E' Very Slight Bend
2580 0 A1' No Symmetric stretch
2713 126 E' Yes Asymmetric stretch
2713 126 E' Yes Asymmetric stretch

The three vibrations at 1214 and at 1164 cm-1 are angle deformations because the angle around the bond is changing but the length of the bond stays the same. The three vibrations at 2713 and at 2580 cm-1 are bond stretches as the bond elongates and then retracts. The two 1214 cm-1, and two 2713 cm-1 vibrations are degenerate as they have the same wavenumber (which is proportional to the energy). The degenerate stretches appear as one peak in the spectrum which is why there are less than 6 peaks observed even though there are six vibrations. The symmetric stretch at 2580 cm-1 is IR inactive since there is no change in dipole moment, and therefore does not appear in the IR spectrum. Vibrations with very low intensity will not be experimentally observable. This includes 2580 cm-1 with an intensity of zero and the degenerate 1214 cm-1 angle deformations, with intensities of approximately 14 cm-1.

Smf115 (talk) 17:14, 28 May 2018 (BST)Correct assignments of the vibrational modes and symmetries and clearly explained answer.

Molecular Orbital Diagram for BH3

The real MO at the bottom left of the MO diagram is the bonding 1s boron MO.

The shaded negative phase in the LCAO MOs correspond to green regions in the real MOs, and unshaded positive phase to red regions. The real MOs appear to cover a larger surface area of the molecule than the LCAOs. For example, a1' in the LCAO doesn't suggest the delocalisation of this MO as can be seen in the real MO for a1'. However, the LCAO shows the composition of the MO more clearly and so it is useful in indicating which atomic orbitals are in combination in order to form that MO. The approximate shape of the LCAOs and real MOs are fairly similar, however there is less of a difference in shape between the s and p orbitals in the real MOs which can make it difficult to distinguish the real MOs; this is a benefit of the LCAOs.

NH3

Calculation method: B3LYP Basis set: 6-31G

              Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000006     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000012     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000008     0.001200     YES
 

Low frequencies ---  -34.7257  -34.7136  -21.3130   -0.0033    0.0071    0.0474
Low frequencies --- 1089.3593 1694.0550 1694.0553
NH3


File:NH3 2 FREQ LJK27.LOG

NH3BH3

Calculation method: B3LYP Basis set: 6-31G

        Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000207     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000079     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.001006     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000524     0.001200     YES

Low frequencies ---   -0.0584   -0.0503   -0.0074   21.5681   21.5784   37.7476
Low frequencies ---  264.2274  631.7078  639.2561
NH3BH3

File:NH3BH3 FREQ LJK27.LOG

•E(NH3)= -56.55777 au •E(BH3)= -26.61532 au •E(NH3BH3)= -83.22469 au

ΔE=E(NH3BH3)-[E(NH3)+E(BH3)]= -0.05160 au (5dp) = -129 kJ/mol

B-N is a fairly strong dative bond. NH3BH3 is a solid at room temperature whereas analogous ethane is a gas which is due to ammonia-borane having a large dipole moment and ethane being non-polar.[1] The association energy for BH3CO is -90.5 kJ/mol which is less than NH3BH3's association energy which again supports B-N being a strong dative bond.[2] This is owing to the large difference in electronegativities of boron and nitrogen.

Smf115 (talk) 17:14, 28 May 2018 (BST)Correct calculation and nice second comprison to another dative bond. However, overall the B-N bond is relatively weak and a good comparison would be the C-C bond (which is the equivalent value for ethane) which is 348 kJ/mol [Atkins Physical Chemistry 8th edition DATA section Table 11.3b]

BBr3

Calculation method: B3LYP

Basis set: 6-31G

      Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000005     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000036     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000023     0.001200     YES

 
Low frequencies ---   -0.0137   -0.0064   -0.0046    2.4315    2.4315    4.8421
Low frequencies ---  155.9631  155.9651  267.7052

BBr3

File:LJK27 BBr3 2 frequency.log

DOI:10042/202464

Aromaticity: Benzene and Borazine

Benzene

Calculation method: B3LYP

Basis set: 6-31G

 Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000198     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000076     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000812     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000283     0.001200     YES

Low frequencies ---   -2.1456   -2.1456   -0.0089   -0.0043   -0.0043   10.4835
Low frequencies ---  413.9768  413.9768  621.1390


Benzene

File:Benzene freq ljk27.log

Borazine

Calculation method: B3LYP

Basis set: 6-31G

 Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000165     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000049     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000409     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000128     0.001200     YES

Low frequencies ---   -8.1143   -7.7640   -7.4910   -0.0099   -0.0082    0.1221
Low frequencies ---  289.0794  289.0902  403.3679
Borazine

File:Borazine freq ljk27.log

Charge Distribution

A Gaussview image of benzene labelled with its charges.
A Gaussview image of borazine labelled with its charges.

The images represent the charge distribution of benzene and borazine. The same colour range was used to visualise the charge intensity by corresponding to the pigment of the colour on the atoms. Borazine has more intense colours and thus more intense charge on the individual atoms. Benzene has a more even spread of charge with a value of +0.239 on the H atoms and -0.239 on the C atoms. The more electronegative atoms have a more negative value of charge located on them than the more electropositive atoms. Therefore, in borazine the N atom has a value of -1.102, +0.432 on H and +0.747 on B.

There is a greater difference in electronegativities in borazine than in benzene, and thus a less even spread of charge due to the alterating ring atoms in borazine. The electronegativity according to the Pauling scale is given as 2.04 for boron and 3.04 for nitrogen. Most of the charge located in borazine is located on ring atoms as can be seen in the image with the H atoms being much duller than the B and N atoms. B and N have a large difference in charge resulting in ionic character of bonds; all the ring atoms in benzene are carbon and so have an equal share of charge.

Similarly the H atoms attached to B atoms are less intense in charge than those attached to N atoms due to a greater difference in electronegativity between N and H compared to B and H.

Smf115 (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2018 (BST)Clear use of the same colour range to highlight the charge distributions across both of the molecules. Nice justification of the charge distributions due to electronegativities and to improve, consider other smaller factors, such as net charge and symmetry.

Molecular Orbitals for Benzene and Borazine

caption
Benzene Borazine Description
MO17 for benzene and MO17 for borazine are very similar. Both MOs have antibonding character with a positive phase above the ring and negative phase below the ring giving an asymmetric phase with one node. These are moderlately low energy bonding MOs. The contributions are from the ring atoms, carbon in benzene and boron and nitrogen atoms in borazine, but there is not a significant contribution from H atoms.
MO21 for benzene and MO21 for borazine show similar bondng character. There are two nodes in both MOs due to changes in phase. Benzene has slightly larger electron clouds and equal contributions from all ring atoms which demonstrates that this benzene MO is very delocalised. The boron atoms in borazine contribute less than the nitrogen atoms, and therefore the MO is less symmetric.
MO15 for benzene and MO14 for borazine have a contribution from all of the atoms in the molecule except for two hydrogen atoms on opposite sides of the ring. Both MOs have two nodes with elements of antibonding character. The benzene MO has greater symmetry whereas in borazine there is greater delocalisation around nitrogen atoms than from the boron atoms owing to differences in electronegativity.

Smf115 (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2018 (BST)Good MO comparison and a nice range of MOs have been selected (15 and 14 especially!). The character of the MO is clearly identified however, further details like the main interactions, symmetry group of the orbital or whether the MO is pi- or sigma- type could be considered to develop the comparison further.

Concept of Aromaticity

Aromaticity was historically described by Kekule as resembling benzene. Properties associated with aromaticity are the intermediate lengths between single and double bonds between the ring atoms, for example in benzene the carbon-carbon bond lengths. There is an aromatic stabilisation energy which has been shown experimentally by comparisons to hydrogenation of cyclohexene to benzene. When placed in an applied magnetic field a pi ring current is induced and a magnetic field is induced by the ring current as a result of electron movements within orbitals, and there is resulting diamagnetic anisotropy. There is a difference in the field experienced by the protons; protons outside the ring experience low field and protons inside the ring experience high field. It is unfavourable for aromatics to lose there resonance stabilisation energy so in reactions with bromine water no decolourisation is observed.

The real MOs show the delocalisation and overlapping of orbitals when the phase is the same, as in MO17 above. The MOs lowest in energy have fewer nodes and greatest orbital overlap. This relates to the basic concept of aromaticity arising as a result of pz AO overlap.

The concept of overlapping pz AOs is a bad description for aromaticity. The pi-electron delocalisation was initially the explanation of aromatic stabilisation. However, there has been suggestion that the sigma electrons also have a role in aromatic stabilisation. The initial definition of aromaticity was for planar structures and the overlap of perpendicular p orbitals but it is now recognised that aromatic structures do not have to be planar.[3] Also aromaticity can be used to describe non-carbon structures such as metallic clusters where these associated properties are seen. Borazine can be described as weakly aromatic with a small ring current (indicating delocalisation), it obeys the 4n + 2 rule, and all BN bond lengths are equal. The (4n + 2) pi electron rule is used for indicating if something is aromatic. This is useful as the electronic structure is fundamental in determining the properties and ultimately aromaticity of a compound.[4]


References

  1. Weller, Overton, Rourke and Armstrong, Inorganic Chemistry, 6th Edition, Page 365.
  2. D.R. Armstrong and P. G. Perkins, J. Chem. Soc, 1969.
  3. M. Palusiak and T. Krygowski, Chemistry. A European Journal.
  4. T. Holtzl, T. Veszpremi, M. T. Nguyen and P. Lievens, Research Gate, 2009.

Smf115 (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2018 (BST)Overall, a good wiki report with a very well attempted first section in particular.