Rep:Mod:JL0513M2
Part 1
Optimisation of BH3 molecule
Starting BH3 molecule, which was created using GaussView 5.0.9, had B-H bond length of 1.5Å.
Optimisation was done for the molecule based on Density Function Theory, using B3LYP method and 3-21G basis set.
Summarised Results for Optimised BH3 Molecule
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: FOPT
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: 3-21G
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -26.46226338 a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: 0.00020672 a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 0.0000 Debye
- Point Group: D3h
- B-H Bond Length: 1.19349Å
- H-B-H Bond Angle: 120.000o
- Job CPU Time: 15.0sec
File:BH3 opt 321G JQ411.log
Item Value Threshold Converged?
Maximum Force 0.000413 0.000450 YES
RMS Force 0.000271 0.000300 YES
Maximum Displacement 0.001610 0.001800 YES
RMS Displacement 0.001054 0.001200 YES
Predicted change in Energy=-1.071764D-06
Optimization completed.
-- Stationary point found.
----------------------------
! Optimized Parameters !
! (Angstroms and Degrees) !
-------------------------- --------------------------
! Name Definition Value Derivative Info. !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! R1 R(1,2) 1.1935 -DE/DX = 0.0004 !
! R2 R(1,3) 1.1935 -DE/DX = 0.0004 !
! R3 R(1,4) 1.1935 -DE/DX = 0.0004 !
! A1 A(2,1,3) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A2 A(2,1,4) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A3 A(3,1,4) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! D1 D(2,1,4,3) 180.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGrad
When the bh3_opt.log file was openedwith the 'Read Intermediate Geometry' box ticked, the starting molecule with bond length 1.5Å showed up. Options were available to view the molecule at each of the 4 optimisation step. If the mentioned box was unticked when opening the file, the options are unavailable and the Optimisation option under the Results tab was unavailable.
The results obtained from the Optimisation options was attached below. Both the Total Energy and RMS Gradient decreases through the optimisation process and reached a minimum at the final step. This shows that the final molecule had the lowest energy and is the most stable. The gradient, dE/dr, represent the force acting on the molecule. The final value of the gradient was close to zero, which indicated that there is close to zero force acting on the optimised molecule. However, the non-zero gradient at the last optimisation step indicated that the optimized molecule was not yet at equilibrium. Therefore, the optimisation has produced BH3 molecule very closed to the equilibrium with minimum energy and close-to-zero net force acting on it.
# Total Energy
# X-Axis: Optimization Step Number
# Y-Axis: Total Energy (Hartree)
# X Y
1.0000000000 -26.3829691154
2.0000000000 -26.4176728330
3.0000000000 -26.4610352782
4.0000000000 -26.4622633796
# RMS Gradient Norm
# X-Axis: Optimization Step Number
# Y-Axis: RMS Gradient Norm (Hartree/Bohr)
# X Y
1.0000000000 0.0355181840
2.0000000000 0.0307318750
3.0000000000 0.0068842700
4.0000000000 0.0002067170
Optimisation of BH3 using 6-21G (d,p) Basis Set
Optimisation of the BH3 molecule obtained from stage 1 using 3-21G basis set was repeated using an improved basis set, 6-21G (d,p). Optimisation was completed in 4 steps and the results are summarized below.
Summarised Results for Optimised BH3 Molecule
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: FOPT
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: 6-31G(d,p)
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -26.61532363 a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: 0.00000296 a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 0.0000 Debye
- Point Group: D3h
- B-H Bond Length: 1.19232Å
- H-B-H Bond Angle: 120.000o
- Job CPU Time: 5.0sec
File:BH3 opt 631G dp JQ411.log
Item Value Threshold Converged?
Maximum Force 0.000006 0.000450 YES
RMS Force 0.000004 0.000300 YES
Maximum Displacement 0.000023 0.001800 YES
RMS Displacement 0.000015 0.001200 YES
Predicted change in Energy=-2.008855D-10
Optimization completed.
-- Stationary point found.
----------------------------
! Optimized Parameters !
! (Angstroms and Degrees) !
-------------------------- --------------------------
! Name Definition Value Derivative Info. !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! R1 R(1,2) 1.1923 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! R2 R(1,3) 1.1923 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! R3 R(1,4) 1.1923 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A1 A(2,1,3) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A2 A(2,1,4) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A3 A(3,1,4) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! D1 D(2,1,4,3) 180.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGrad
(edit)
In comparison to the previous calculation done using 3-21G basis set, there was a slight decrease of 0.0021Å in bond length. The total energy of the molecule optimised using 6-31G(d,p) basis set was significantly lower, 0.15305914 a.u. (401.9kJ/mol), than that using 3-21G basis set. This indicated that the use of an improved basis set produced a much more stable BH3 molecule. Like the previous result, the RMS gradient obtained remained small but non-zero. Hence, the molecule obtained is close to but not the most stable form at equilibrium.
Optimisation of TlBr3 using PP
(raw data only)
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: FOPT
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: LANL2DZ
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -91.21812851 a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: 0.00000090 a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 0.0000 Debye
- Point Group: D3h
- Tl-Br Bond Length: 2.65095Å
- Br--Tl-Br Bond Angle: 120.000o
- Job CPU Time: 37.5sec
File:TlBr3 opt lanl2dz JQ411.log
Item Value Threshold Converged?
Maximum Force 0.000002 0.000450 YES
RMS Force 0.000001 0.000300 YES
Maximum Displacement 0.000022 0.001800 YES
RMS Displacement 0.000014 0.001200 YES
Predicted change in Energy=-6.083976D-11
Optimization completed.
-- Stationary point found.
----------------------------
! Optimized Parameters !
! (Angstroms and Degrees) !
-------------------------- --------------------------
! Name Definition Value Derivative Info. !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! R1 R(1,2) 2.651 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! R2 R(1,3) 2.651 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! R3 R(1,4) 2.651 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A1 A(2,1,3) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A2 A(2,1,4) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A3 A(3,1,4) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! D1 D(2,1,4,3) 180.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGrad
Optimisation of BBr3 using PP and Basis Set
(to edit)
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: FOPT
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: Gen
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -64.43645296 a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: 0.00000382 a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 0.0000 Debye
- Point Group: D3h
- B-Br Bond Length: 1.93396Å
- Br-B-Br Bond Angle: 120.000o
- Job CPU Time: 36.7sec
File:BBr3 opt gen JQ411.log
Item Value Threshold Converged?
Maximum Force 0.000008 0.000450 YES
RMS Force 0.000005 0.000300 YES
Maximum Displacement 0.000036 0.001800 YES
RMS Displacement 0.000023 0.001200 YES
Predicted change in Energy=-4.026780D-10
Optimization completed.
-- Stationary point found.
----------------------------
! Optimized Parameters !
! (Angstroms and Degrees) !
-------------------------- --------------------------
! Name Definition Value Derivative Info. !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! R1 R(1,2) 1.934 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! R2 R(1,3) 1.934 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! R3 R(1,4) 1.934 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A1 A(2,1,3) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A2 A(2,1,4) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A3 A(3,1,4) 120.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! D1 D(2,1,4,3) 180.0 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGrad
Optimisation of D3h molecule - Summary of Results and Discussion
Different methods have been enployed to optimise 3 D3h symmetry molecules. The bond lengths of the optimised molecules are shown in the table below.
| Molecule | Type of bond | Optimised bond length/Å |
|---|---|---|
| BH3 | B-H | 1.19232 |
| BBr3 | B-Br | 1.93396 |
| TlBr3 | Tl-Br | 2.65095 |
Discussion:
What difference does changing the ligand have?
How are H and Br similar, how are they different?
What difference does changing the central element make?
How are B and Tl similar, how are they different?
In some structures gaussview does not draw in the bonds where we expect, does this mean there is no bond? Why?
What is a bond?
Part 2
BH3 Frequency Analysis
Summarised Results
Low frequencies --- -0.9432 -0.8611 -0.0054 5.7455 11.7246 11.7625
Low frequencies --- 1162.9963 1213.1826 1213.1853
Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering
activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized
incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),
and normal coordinates:
1 2 3
A2" E' E'
Frequencies -- 1162.9963 1213.1826 1213.1853
Red. masses -- 1.2531 1.1072 1.1072
Frc consts -- 0.9986 0.9601 0.9601
IR Inten -- 92.5482 14.0551 14.0587
Atom AN X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
1 5 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.10 0.00 -0.10 0.00 0.00
2 1 0.00 0.00 -0.57 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00
3 1 0.00 0.00 -0.57 0.39 -0.59 0.00 0.14 -0.39 0.00
4 1 0.00 0.00 -0.57 -0.39 -0.59 0.00 0.14 0.39 0.00
4 5 6
A1' E' E'
Frequencies -- 2582.2764 2715.4465 2715.4477
Red. masses -- 1.0078 1.1273 1.1273
Frc consts -- 3.9595 4.8977 4.8977
IR Inten -- 0.0000 126.3302 126.3206
Atom AN X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
1 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00
2 1 0.00 -0.58 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.81 0.00
3 1 0.50 0.29 0.00 -0.60 -0.36 0.00 -0.36 -0.19 0.00
4 1 -0.50 0.29 0.00 -0.60 0.36 0.00 0.36 -0.19 0.00
| No. | Symmetry (D3h) | Form of Vibration | Frequency/cm-1 | IR (intensity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E' | 1163.00 | 92.5482 | |
| 2 | A2" | 1213.18 | 14.0551 | |
| 3 | E' | 1213.19 | 14.0587 | |
| 4 | E' | 2582.28 | 0.0000 | |
| 5 | A1' | 2715.45 | 126.3302 | |
| 6 | E' | 2715.45 | 126.3206 |
Description of Vibration Modes:
(insert image and description)
Computed Spectrum for BH3 Molecule

- Explain why there are less than 6 peaks on IR spectrum.
TlBr3 Frequency Analysis
Summarized Results
Low frequencies --- -3.4213 -0.0026 -0.0004 0.0015 3.9367 3.9367
Low frequencies --- 46.4289 46.4292 52.1449
Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering
activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized
incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),
and normal coordinates:
1 2 3
E' E' A2"
Frequencies -- 46.4289 46.4292 52.1449
Red. masses -- 88.4613 88.4613 117.7209
Frc consts -- 0.1124 0.1124 0.1886
IR Inten -- 3.6867 3.6867 5.8466
Atom AN X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
1 81 0.00 0.28 0.00 -0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55
2 35 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.48
3 35 0.43 -0.49 0.00 -0.01 -0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.48
4 35 -0.43 -0.49 0.00 -0.01 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.48
4 5 6
A1' E' E'
Frequencies -- 165.2685 210.6948 210.6948
Red. masses -- 78.9183 101.4032 101.4032
Frc consts -- 1.2700 2.6522 2.6522
IR Inten -- 0.0000 25.4830 25.4797
Atom AN X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
1 81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00
2 35 0.00 -0.58 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.74 0.00
3 35 0.50 0.29 0.00 -0.55 -0.32 0.00 -0.32 -0.18 0.00
4 35 -0.50 0.29 0.00 -0.55 0.32 0.00 0.32 -0.18 0.00
| No. | Symmetry (D3h) | Form of Vibration | Frequency/cm-1 | IR (intensity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E' | 46.43 | 3.6867 | |
| 2 | E' | 46.43 | 3.6867 | |
| 3 | A2" | 52.14 | 5.8446 | |
| 4 | A1' | 165.27 | 0.0000 | |
| 5 | E' | 210.69 | 25.4830 | |
| 6 | E' | 210.69 | 25.4797 |
Description of Vibration Modes
Computed Spectrum for TlBr3 Molecule

Discussion
What does the large difference in the value of the frequencies for BH3 compared to TlBr3 indicate?
Has there been a reordering of modes?
How are these spectra similar?
For both spectra two modes lie fairly closely together, the A2 and E' modes and then the other two modes also lie fairly close together, the A1' and E' modes, but higher in energy. Why is this?
Why must you use the same method and basis set for both the optimisation and frequency analysis calculations?
What is the purpose of carrying out a frequency analysis?
What do the "Low frequencies" represent?
BH3 MO Diagram and Calculated MO
The molecular orbital diagram for D3h BH3 molecule is shown below. The calculated molecular orbitals using 6-31G basis set are shown next to the respective MO on the diagram. The shape, symmetry and phase pattern of the calculated molecular orbital and the molecular orbitals constructed qualitatively using a MO diagram are very similar. However, with only a qualitative approach, the energy level of 3a1' and 1a2" could not be determined exactly. However, using computational calculation method, the 1a2" MO was determined to be the HOMO. Hence the 1a2" has a lower energy level than 3a1' as shown below.
File:Bh3 mo diagram jq411.pdf
NBO Analysis of NH3
Optimisation - Summarised Results
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: FOPT
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: 6-31G(d,p)
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -56.55776856 a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: 0.00000885 a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 1.8464 Debye
- Point Group: C1
- N-H Bond Length: 1.01797Å
- H-N-H Bond Angle: 105.741o
- Job CPU Time: 19.0sec
File:NH3 OPT 631G JQ411.log
Item Value Threshold Converged?
Maximum Force 0.000024 0.000450 YES
RMS Force 0.000012 0.000300 YES
Maximum Displacement 0.000079 0.001800 YES
RMS Displacement 0.000053 0.001200 YES
Predicted change in Energy=-1.629725D-09
Optimization completed.
-- Stationary point found.
----------------------------
! Optimized Parameters !
! (Angstroms and Degrees) !
-------------------------- --------------------------
! Name Definition Value Derivative Info. !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! R1 R(1,2) 1.018 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! R2 R(1,3) 1.018 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! R3 R(1,4) 1.018 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A1 A(2,1,3) 105.7413 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A2 A(2,1,4) 105.7486 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! A3 A(3,1,4) 105.7479 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
! D1 D(2,1,4,3) -111.8631 -DE/DX = 0.0 !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGradGrad
Frequency Analysis - Summarised Results
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: FREQ
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: 6-31G(d,p)
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -56.55776863a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: 0.00000281 a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 1.8464 Debye
- Point Group: C3V (symmetry restricted for calculation)
- N-H Bond Length: 1.01797Å
- H-N-H Bond Angle: 105.746o
- Job CPU Time: 8.0sec
File:NH3 FREQ JQ411.log
Low frequencies --- -11.6223 -11.5869 -0.0033 0.0243 0.1403 25.5604
Low frequencies --- 1089.6629 1694.1734 1694.1737
Harmonic frequencies (cm**-1), IR intensities (KM/Mole), Raman scattering
activities (A**4/AMU), depolarization ratios for plane and unpolarized
incident light, reduced masses (AMU), force constants (mDyne/A),
and normal coordinates:
1 2 3
A1 E E
Frequencies -- 1089.6629 1694.1733 1694.1737
Red. masses -- 1.1800 1.0644 1.0644
Frc consts -- 0.8255 1.8001 1.8001
IR Inten -- 145.4476 13.5570 13.5572
Atom AN X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
1 7 0.00 0.00 0.12 -0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00
2 1 0.00 -0.21 -0.53 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.26
3 1 0.18 0.11 -0.53 0.08 -0.39 0.22 0.39 -0.53 -0.13
4 1 -0.18 0.11 -0.53 0.08 0.39 -0.22 -0.39 -0.53 -0.13
4 5 6
A1 E E
Frequencies -- 3461.0664 3589.5533 3589.5534
Red. masses -- 1.0272 1.0883 1.0883
Frc consts -- 7.2500 8.2622 8.2622
IR Inten -- 1.0589 0.2701 0.2702
Atom AN X Y Z X Y Z X Y Z
1 7 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00
2 1 0.00 -0.55 0.18 0.00 -0.75 0.31 0.02 0.00 0.00
3 1 0.47 0.27 0.18 -0.34 -0.17 -0.15 -0.56 -0.34 -0.27
4 1 -0.47 0.27 0.18 0.34 -0.17 -0.15 -0.56 0.34 0.27
Table summarizing the vibration modes
Results of frequency analysis using restricted symmetry was used to tabulate the data below.
| No. | Symmetry (C3V) | Form of Vibration | Frequency/cm-1 | IR (intensity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A1 | 1089.66 | 145.4476 | |
| 2 | E | 1694.17 | 13.5570 | |
| 3 | E | 1694.17 | 13.5572 | |
| 4 | A1 | 3461.07 | 1.0589 | |
| 5 | E | 3589.55 | 0.2702 | |
| 6 | E | 3589.55 | 0.2701 |
Description of Vibration Modes
Computed IR Spectrum

Population Analysis
- File Type: .chk
- Calculation Type: SP
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: 6-31G(d,p)
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -56.55776856 a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: - a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 1.8464 Debye
- Point Group: -
- N-H Bond Length: 1.01797Å
- H-N-H Bond Angle: 105.741o
- Job CPU Time: -
include MO diagram and screenshots here
NBO Analysis
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: SP
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: 6-31G(d,p)
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -56.55776856 a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: - a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 1.8464 Debye
- Point Group: C1
- N-H Bond Length: 1.01797Å
- H-N-H Bond Angle: 105.741o
- Job CPU Time: 4.0sec
- Color Range: -1.125 to 1.125

File:NH3 NBO JQ411.log
Natural Population
Natural -----------------------------------------------
Atom No Charge Core Valence Rydberg Total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
N 1 -1.12515 1.99982 6.11104 0.01429 8.12515
H 2 0.37505 0.00000 0.62250 0.00246 0.62495
H 3 0.37505 0.00000 0.62250 0.00246 0.62495
H 4 0.37505 0.00000 0.62249 0.00246 0.62495
=======================================================================
* Total * 0.00000 1.99982 7.97852 0.02166 10.00000
(Occupancy) Bond orbital/ Coefficients/ Hybrids
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. (1.99909) BD ( 1) N 1 - H 2
( 68.83%) 0.8297* N 1 s( 24.87%)p 3.02( 75.05%)d 0.00( 0.09%)
-0.0001 -0.4986 -0.0059 0.0000 -0.2910
0.0052 0.8155 0.0277 0.0000 0.0000
0.0281 0.0000 0.0000 0.0032 0.0082
( 31.17%) 0.5583* H 2 s( 99.91%)p 0.00( 0.09%)
-0.9996 0.0000 0.0072 -0.0289 0.0000
2. (1.99909) BD ( 1) N 1 - H 3
( 68.83%) 0.8297* N 1 s( 24.86%)p 3.02( 75.05%)d 0.00( 0.09%)
0.0001 0.4986 0.0059 0.0000 0.2910
-0.0052 0.4077 0.0138 0.7062 0.0240
0.0140 0.0243 0.0076 0.0033 0.0031
( 31.17%) 0.5583* H 3 s( 99.91%)p 0.00( 0.09%)
0.9996 0.0000 -0.0072 -0.0145 -0.0250
3. (1.99909) BD ( 1) N 1 - H 4
( 68.83%) 0.8297* N 1 s( 24.87%)p 3.02( 75.05%)d 0.00( 0.09%)
0.0001 0.4986 0.0059 0.0000 0.2909
-0.0052 0.4077 0.0138 -0.7062 -0.0239
0.0140 -0.0243 -0.0076 0.0033 0.0031
( 31.17%) 0.5583* H 4 s( 99.91%)p 0.00( 0.09%)
0.9996 0.0000 -0.0072 -0.0145 0.0250
4. (1.99982) CR ( 1) N 1 s(100.00%)
1.0000 -0.0002 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
5. (1.99721) LP ( 1) N 1 s( 25.38%)p 2.94( 74.52%)d 0.00( 0.10%)
0.0001 0.5036 -0.0120 0.0000 -0.8618
0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.0269 0.0155
Natural Bond Orbitals (Summary):
Principal Delocalizations
NBO Occupancy Energy (geminal,vicinal,remote)
====================================================================================
Molecular unit 1 (H3N)
1. BD ( 1) N 1 - H 2 1.99909 -0.60417
2. BD ( 1) N 1 - H 3 1.99909 -0.60417
3. BD ( 1) N 1 - H 4 1.99909 -0.60416
4. CR ( 1) N 1 1.99982 -14.16768
5. LP ( 1) N 1 1.99721 -0.31756 24(v),16(v),20(v),17(v)
21(v),25(v)
Association Energy
Optimization and Frequency Analysis of BH3NH3
Optimisation Summarised Results
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: FOPT
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: 6-31G(d,p)
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -83.22468956a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: 0.00005843 a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 5.5651 Debye
- Point Group: C1
- N-B Bond Length: 1.66807Å
- N-H Bond Length: 1.01860Å increase bond length
- B-H Bond Length: 1.21005Å increase bond length
- H-B-H Bond Angle: 113.874o reduced bond angle (4 bond pairs present now but angle less than tetrahedral)
- H-N-H Bond Angle: 107.868o increase bond angle (reduced repulsion from bond pair in BH3NH3 than lone pair in NH3)
- H-N-B Bond Angle: 111.028o
- H-B-N Bond Angle: 104.600o 4 bond pairs around B atom, no longer planar
- Dihedral Angle: 59.998o staggered conformation reducing steric hindrance
- Job CPU Time: 1min 31.0sec
File:BH3NH3 OPT 631GDP JQ411.log
Item Value Threshold Converged?
Maximum Force 0.000124 0.000450 YES
RMS Force 0.000057 0.000300 YES
Maximum Displacement 0.000660 0.001800 YES
RMS Displacement 0.000304 0.001200 YES
Predicted change in Energy=-1.649877D-07
Optimization completed.
-- Stationary point found.
Frequency Analysis Summarised Results
- File Type: .log
- Calculation Type: FREQ
- Calculation Method: RB3LYP
- Basis Set: 6-31G(d,p)
- Charge: 0
- Spin: Singlet
- E(RB3LYP): -83.22469013a.u.
- RMS Gradient Norm: 0.00006160 a.u.
- Dipole Moment: 5.5648 Debye
- Point Group: C3v (restricted for frequency analysis)
- N-B Bond Length: 1.66807Å
- N-H Bond Length: 1.01860Å increase bond length
- B-H Bond Length: 1.21005Å increase bond length
- H-B-H Bond Angle: 113.877o reduced bond angle (4 bond pairs present now but angle less than tetrahedral)
- H-N-H Bond Angle: 107.872o increase bond angle (reduced repulsion from bond pair in BH3NH3 than lone pair in NH3)
- H-N-B Bond Angle: 111.027o
- H-B-N Bond Angle: 104.593o 4 bond pairs around B atom, no longer planar
- Dihedral Angle: 60o staggered conformation reducing steric hindrance
- Job CPU Time: 36.0sec
File:BH3NH3 FREQ 631GDP JQ411.log
Low frequencies --- -0.0614 -0.0462 -0.0066 21.4199 21.4259 40.8153 Low frequencies --- 266.0487 632.3810 640.1253
highest low frequency is ~40cm-1
Association Energy of BH3NH3
| Molecule | Optimised Energy/ au |
|---|---|
| BH3 | -26.61532363 |
| NH3 | -56.55776856 |
| BH3NH3 | -83.22468956 |
ΔE=E(NH3BH3)-[E(NH3)+E(BH3)]
ΔE=-0.05159737 au
ΔE=-135.47kJ/mol
Calculated value is about -20kJ/mol different from literature value (Constantin Z. 1981. doi: 10.1063/1.441886) calculated using different method and basis set.