Rep:Mod:01502946
NH3, N2 and H2
NH3 information
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Calculation Method | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| E(RB3LYP) | -56.55777 a.u |
| RMS Gradient Norm | 0.00000485 a.u |
| Point Group | C3V |
| Optimised bond length (N-H) | 1.02 Å |
| Optimised bond angle (H-N-H) | 106° |
| Item | Value | Threshold | Converged? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Force | 0.000004 | 0.000450 | YES |
| RMS Force | 0.000004 | 0.000300 | YES |
| Maximum Displacement | 0.000072 | 0.001800 | YES |
| RMS Displacement | 0.000035 | 0.001200 | YES |
Optimised NH |
File:SIIMK NH3 OPTIMISATION FIRSTTEST.LOG
Vibrational frequencies of NH3
| Symmetry | A1 | E | E | A1 | E | E |
| Vibrational frequencies (cm−1) | 1090 | 1694 | 1694 | 3461 | 3590 | 3590 |
| IR intensities | 145 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Images | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
How many modes do you expect from the 3N-6 rule? There are 4 atoms in NH3. Therefore N = 4. 3*4-6 = 6 modes.
Which modes are degenerate (ie have the same energy)? There are 2 degenerate bending modes at 1694 cm−1 and 2 degenerate stretching modes at 3590 cm−1.
Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations? Bending: 1090 cm−1, 1694 cm−1. Vibrations at higher frequencies correspond to bond stretch modes.
Which mode is highly symmetric? The stretching mode at 3461 cm−1.
One mode is known as the "umbrella" mode, which one is this? The symmetric bending mode at 1090 cm−1.
How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia? 2 bands. One corresponds to the umbrella mode at 1090 cm−1 and the other band to the bending mode at 1694 cm−1. This is due to the fact that only these modes are predicted to be high enough in intensity to be visible. The stretching modes are orders of magnitude smaller in intensity and thus unlikely to be seen in the spectrum.
Charge distribution in NH3
The red atom corresponds to nitrogen and green atoms are hydrogens. As nitrogen is more electronegative than hydrogen, N pulls electron density away from H atoms and obtains a negative charge as a consequence.
N2 information
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Calculation Method | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| E(RB3LYP) | -109.52413 a.u |
| RMS Gradient Norm | 0.00000060 a.u |
| Point Group | D∞h |
| Optimised bond length (N-N) | 1.11 Å |
| Optimised bond angle (N-N) | 180° |
A wolfram complex with two N2 ligands[1]
N-N triple bond length in the wolfram complex is 1.127 Å as reported in the database of Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.[1] The bond length in a free N2 molecule was approximated to be about 1.11 Å using the Gaussian software. The bond length of N2 in the complex is larger for to the reason that the wolfram atom withdraws electron density from the ligand (N2). As a consequence, electron density on N2 decreases, the bond weakens and bond length increases. Note that the two N2 ligands are equivalent in the complex and N-N bond lengths are the same for both ligands.
| Item | Value | Threshold | Converged? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Force | 0.000001 | 0.000450 | YES |
| RMS Force | 0.000001 | 0.000300 | YES |
| Maximum Displacement | 0.000000 | 0.001800 | YES |
| RMS Displacement | 0.000000 | 0.001200 | YES |
Optimised N |
File:SIIMK N2 OPTIMISATION SECONDTEST.LOG
Vibrational frequencies of N2
| Symmetry | SGG |
| Vibrational frequencies (cm−1) | 2457 |
| IR intensities | 0 |
| Images |
|
Charge distribution in N2
Both atoms represented on the image are N atoms. For the electronegatives of both nitrogens are equivalent, the atoms bear no charges, as expected.
H2 information
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Calculation Method | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| E(RB3LYP) | -1.17854 a.u |
| RMS Gradient Norm | 0.00000017 a.u |
| Point Group | D∞h |
| Optimised bond length (H-H) | 0.74 Å |
| Optimised bond angle (H-H) | 180° |
| Item | Value | Threshold | Converged? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Force | 0.000000 | 0.000450 | YES |
| RMS Force | 0.000000 | 0.000300 | YES |
| Maximum Displacement | 0.000000 | 0.001800 | YES |
| RMS Displacement | 0.000001 | 0.001200 | YES |
Optimised H |
File:SIIMK H2 OPTIMISATION FIRSTTEST.LOG
Vibrational frequencies of H2
| Symmetry | SGG |
| Vibrational frequencies (cm−1) | 4466 |
| IR intensities | 0 |
| Images |
|
Charge distribution in H2
Both atom represented on the image are hydrogen atoms. For the electronegatives of both hydrogens are equivalent, the atoms bear no charges, as expected.
The Haber–Bosch process
In the Haber–Bosch process, ammonia is produced from gaseous nitrogen and hydrogen.
E(NH3)= -56.55777 a.u
2*E(NH3)= -113.11554 a.u
E(N2)= -109.52413 a.u
E(H2)= -1.17854 a.u
3*E(H2)= -3.53562 a.u
ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -0.05579 a.u = -146.5 kJ/mol
The given reaction is strongly exothermic. Thus the product (ammonia) lies at a lower energy level than the starting materials and is more stable.
Molecule of choice: Hydrogen cyanide (HCN)
HCN information
| Parameter | Values |
|---|---|
| Calculation Method | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| E(RB3LYP) | -93.42458132 a.u |
| RMS Gradient Norm | 0.00017006 a.u |
| Point Group | C∞v |
| Optimised bond length (C-N) | 1.16 Å |
| Optimised bond length (C-H) | 1.07 Å |
| Optimised bond angle (H-C-N) | 180° |
| Item | Value | Threshold | Converged? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Force | 0.000370 | 0.000450 | YES |
| RMS Force | 0.000255 | 0.000300 | YES |
| Maximum Displacement | 0.000676 | 0.001800 | YES |
| RMS Displacement | 0.000427 | 0.001200 | YES |
Optimised NH3 |
Link to log file: File:SK7118 HCN FIRSTTEST.LOG
Vibrational frequencies of HCN
| Symmetry | PI | PI | SG | SG |
| Vibrational frequencies (cm−1) | 767 | 767 | 2215 | 3480 |
| IR intensities | 35 | 35 | 2 | 57 |
| Images | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Charge distribution in HCN
Atoms (1), (2) and (3) in the photo correspond to hydrogen, carbon and nitrogen, respectively. As nitrogen is more electronegative than carbon, it pulls electron density from C. Thus N obtains a negative charge. As C is more electronegative than H, it obtains a smaller positive charge than H but not a negative charge for it is also bonded to a nitrogen.
Molecular orbitals
Energies of first 10 MOs of HCN (eV)
Note: * - this orbital is a canonical orbital and delocalized over the molecule and contributes to the C-N and C-H sigma bonds and the lone pair. Therefore it is hard to tell.
Extra: CO
CO information
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Calculation Method | RB3LYP |
| Basis Set | 6-31G(d,p) |
| E(RB3LYP) | -113.30945314 a.u |
| RMS Gradient Norm | 0.00001828 a.u |
| Point Group | C∞v |
| Optimised bond length (C-O) | 1.14 Å |
| Optimised bond angle (C-O) | 180° |
| Item | Value | Threshold | Converged? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum Force | 0.000032 | 0.000450 | YES |
| RMS Force | 0.000032 | 0.000300 | YES |
| Maximum Displacement | 0.000012 | 0.001800 | YES |
| RMS Displacement | 0.000018 | 0.001200 | YES |
Optimised CO |
Vibrational frequencies of CO
| Symmetry | SG |
| Vibrational frequencies (cm−1) | 2209 |
| IR intensities | 68 |
| Images |
|
Charge distribution in CO
The green and red atoms in the photo correspond to carbon and oxygen, respectively. As oxygen is more electronegative than carbon, it withdraws electron density from carbon and thus obtains a negative charge. As the total charge of a neutral molecule must be 0, the charges are of equal magnitude but with opposite sign.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 T.Wagner, U.Englert, Structural Chemistry, 1997, 8, 357, DOI: 10.1007/BF02281249: https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/Search?Ccdcid=ZURKIG01&DatabaseToSearch=Published
Marking
Note: All grades and comments are provisional and subject to change until your grades are officially returned via blackboard. Please do not contact anyone about anything to do with the marking of this lab until you have received your grade from blackboard.
Wiki structure and presentation 1/1
Is your wiki page clear and easy to follow, with consistent formatting?
YES
Do you effectively use tables, figures and subheadings to communicate your work?
YES - however the captions of your jmols are incorrect except for the last one. E.g. you labelled ammonia as NH and not NH3.
NH3 1/1
Have you completed the calculation and given a link to the file?
YES
Have you included summary and item tables in your wiki?
YES
Have you included a 3d jmol file or an image of the finished structure?
YES
Have you included the bond lengths and angles asked for?
YES
Have you included the “display vibrations” table?
YES
Have you added a table to your wiki listing the wavenumber and intensity of each vibration?
YES
Did you do the optional extra of adding images of the vibrations?
YES
Have you included answers to the questions about vibrations and charges in the lab script?
YES
N2 and H2 0/0.5
Have you completed the calculations and included all relevant information? (summary, item table, structural information, jmol image, vibrations and charges)
YES - However you stated bond angles for diatomic molecules. To define a bond angle three atoms are needed.
Crystal structure comparison 0.5/0.5
Have you included a link to a structure from the CCDC that includes a coordinated N2 or H2 molecule?
YES
Have you compared your optimised bond distance to the crystal structure bond distance?
YES
Haber-Bosch reaction energy calculation 1/1
Have you correctly calculated the energies asked for? ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]
YES
Have you reported your answers to the correct number of decimal places?
YES
Do your energies have the correct +/- sign?
YES
Have you answered the question, Identify which is more stable the gaseous reactants or the ammonia product?
YES
Your choice of small molecule 3.5/5
Have you completed the calculation and included all relevant information?
YES
Have you added information about MOs and charges on atoms?
YES
You could have explained the calculated vibrations as you did for NH3. MO3 is definitely a bonding MO as it originates from s orbitals with the same phase only! MO9 is an out-of-phase combination of the 2px and 3px on C and N. If N would not contribute to this MO almost no electron density would be located close to it. You could have discussed the relative energies of the MOs in more detail.
Independence 1/1
If you have finished everything else and have spare time in the lab you could:
Check one of your results against the literature, or
Do an extra calculation on another small molecule, or
YES - However you stated bond angles for diatomic molecules. To define a bond angle three atoms are needed.
Do some deeper analysis on your results so far






























