Jump to content

Rep:MOD:kt916

From ChemWiki

NH3 Molecule

N-H Bond Distance

1.01798 Angstroms

H-N-H Bond Angle

105.741o

Calculation Method

RB3LYP

Basis set

6-31G(d.p)

E(RB3LYP) Final Energy

-56.55776873 a.u

RMS gradient

0.00000485 a.u

Point Group

C3v

Item Table

     
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES

Interactive

Ammonia molecule

The optimisation file is liked to here

Vibrational Mode(s)

Questions

From the 3N-6 rule, (N=4) the number of expected nodes is 6, which is shown in the picture above.

Modes 2&3 and 5&6 are degenerate.

Modes 1,2,3 are Bending vibrations and Modes 4,5,6 are stretching vibrations.

Mode 4 is highly symmetric

Mode 1 is the umbrella mode.

2 bands would be seen in an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia.

The Charges on the Ammonia molecule are as follows:

N = -1.125e

H= 0.375e

Which is expected as N has a greater electronegativity than H.

N2 Molecule

N-N Bond Distance

1.10550 Angstroms

N-N Bond Angle

180 o Linear Molecule

Calculation Method

RB3LYP

Basis set

6-31G(d.p)

E(RB3LYP) Final Energy

-109.52412868 a.u

RMS gradient

0.00000365 a.u

Point Group

DHinf

Item Table

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000006     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000002     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000003     0.001200     YES

Interactive

Nitrogen molecule

The optimisation file is liked to here

Vibrational Mode(s)

Questions

From the 3N-5 rule, (N=2) the number of expected nodes is 1, which is shown in the picture above.

There is only 1 mode, and it is a symmetric stretching vibration

no band would be seen in an experimental spectrum of Nitrogen. (Diatomic molecule)

The Charges on the Nitrogen molecule are as follows:

N = 0e

Which is expected as both are the same element hence the same electronegavity.

H2 Molecule

H-H Bond Distance

1.10550 Angstroms

H-H Bond Angle

180 o Linear Molecule

Calculation Method

RB3LYP

Basis set

6-31G(d.p)

E(RB3LYP) Final Energy

-1.17853936 a.u

RMS gradient

0.00000017 a.u

Point Group

DHinf

Item Table

         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES

Interactive

Hydrogen molecule

The optimisation file is liked to here

Vibrational Mode(s)

Questions

From the 3N-5 rule, (N=2) the number of expected nodes is 1, which is shown in the picture above.

There is only 1 mode, and it is a symmetric stretching vibration

No band would be seen in an experimental spectrum of Nitrogen. (Diatomic molecule)

The Charges on the Hydrogen molecule are as follows:

H = 0e

Which is expected as both are the same element hence the same electronegavity.

Reaction Energies

   E(NH3)= -56.55776873 a.u
   2*E(NH3)= -113.1155375 a.u
   E(N2)= -109.52412868 a.u
   E(H2)= -1.17853936 a.u
   3*E(H2)= -3.53561808 a.u
   ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -0.05579074 a.u or -146.4785879 kJmol-1

The Literature value for the formation of Ammonia gas is -45.94kJ-1 [1]

  1. Cox, Wagman, et al., 1984 Cox, J.D.; Wagman, D.D.; Medvedev, V.A., CODATA Key Values for Thermodynamics, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1984, 1. .

Which is drastically lower than the calculated value above, mainly due to the assumptions made while optimizing the m9olecule, such as the force field methods which is different in reality. Ammonia is thermodynamically more stable than it's reactants (Hydrogen and Nitrogen gas), this can be seen as the change in energy (ΔE) is negative (exothermic).

CN- Ion

C-N Bond Distance

1.18409 Angstroms

C-N Bond Angle

180o

Calculation Method

RB3LYP

Basis set

6-31G(d.p)

E(RB3LYP) Final Energy

-92.82453153 a.u

RMS gradient

0.00000704 a.u

Point Group

Cinfv


Dipole Moment

0.5236 Debye

Item Table

     
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000012     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000012     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000005     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000008     0.001200     YES

Interactive

Cynaide Ion

The optimisation file is liked to here

Vibrational Mode(s)

Questions

From the 3N-5 rule, (N=2) the number of expected nodes is 1, which is shown in the picture above.

The single mode is a symmetric stretch.

1 band would be seen in an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia.

The Charges on the Cyanide Ion are as follows:

C = -0.246e

N = -0.754e

Which is expected as N has a greater electronegativity than C (3.04 and 2.55 respectively), and the charges add up to -1e, which is the total charge of the Ion.

Molecular Orbitals for CN-

Bond order=3

1s orbitals

This picture shows the first 12 Orbitals of the CN- ion, in which the first 7 are occupied.

Below are the first 2 orbitals.

These are the 1s orbitals for both Nitrogen and Carbon (numbered 1 and 2), Nitrogen being lower in energy at -14.00393 a.u and carbon at -9.86720 a.u. There are no interactions between the atomic orbitals, as all the electron density is concentrated at one atom. The nitrogen 1s is expected to have the lower energy due to it's greater electronegavitiy, hence it holds it's electrons closer to the nucleus, making it more stable.

2s orbitals

The images above show the 2σg (bonding) and 2σ*u (anti-bonding) molecular orbitals (numbered 3 and 4).

The 2σg molecular orbital is caused by the overlap of the 2s atomic orbitals (in phase) from both carbon and nitrogen, this is the same for the 2σ*u, however, the atomic orbitals are out of phase.

2p orbitals


The images above shows two bonding 1πu orbitals (numbered 5 and 6), which are degenerate in energy and two anti-bonding 1π*u orbitals (numbered 8 and 9 which are the LUMOs), which arealso degenerate in energy

The 1πu molecular orbitals come from the overlap of 2p atomic orbitals of C and N in phase, while the anti-bonding (higher in energy due to electron density not being between the Molecule) have the overlaps out of phase, the orbitals in this case the 2px and 2py atomic orbitals. They are degenerate in energy due to all p orbitals being degenerate (in each atom).

3s orbitals

The images above shows the bonding 3σg orbital (also the HOMO) and the anti-bonding 3σ*u (numbered 7 and 10 respectively).

These molecular orbitals,are caused by the overlap of the 2pz orbitals in both C and N, in which the bonding is in phase while anti-bonding isn't. The Molecular orbitals are not perfectly symmetrical because there is a difference in energy between the p orbitals of carbon and nitrogen, Nitrogen being lower due to it's greater electronegavity. There is also some mixing of the orbitals as well (sp hybridization).