Jump to content

Rep:MOD:dhk3517

From ChemWiki

NH3 optimization

Summary

Molecule              NH3
Calculation method    RB3LYP
Basis Set             6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP)            -56.55776873 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm     0.00000485 a.u.
Point Group           C3V

Geometric Information

Optimized bond distance (N-H) = 1.01798Å

Optimized bond angle (H-N-H) = 105.741°

Items

    Item                   Value      Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-5.986281D-10
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
                           ----------------------------
                           !   Optimized Parameters   !
                           ! (Angstroms and Degrees)  !
 --------------------------                            --------------------------
 ! Name  Definition              Value          Derivative Info.                !
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ! R1    R(1,2)                  1.018          -DE/DX =    0.0                 !
 ! R2    R(1,3)                  1.018          -DE/DX =    0.0                 !
 ! R3    R(1,4)                  1.018          -DE/DX =    0.0                 !
 ! A1    A(2,1,3)              105.7412         -DE/DX =    0.0                 !
 ! A2    A(2,1,4)              105.7412         -DE/DX =    0.0                 !
 ! A3    A(3,1,4)              105.7412         -DE/DX =    0.0                 !
 ! D1    D(2,1,4,3)           -111.8571         -DE/DX =    0.0                 !
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jmol dynamic image of NH3

NH3

Link to completed NH3 optimization

File:KWUNDAHYE NH3 OPT.LOG

Vibrational Analysis

1.How many modes do you expect from the 3N-6 rule?

 3(4)-6 = 6 modes 

2.Which modes are degenerate (i.e. have the same energy)?

 2 and 3, 5 and 6
 The two pairs have the same frequency which means they are of same energy.

3.Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations?

 Bending: 1,2,3 as the vibrations cause a change in bond angles
 Stretching: 4,5,6 as the vibrations cause a change in bond lengths
 

4.Which mode is highly symmetric?

 1: All three bonds bend simultaneously with the same angle in the same direction
 4: All three bonds stretch to the same extent simultaneously 

5.One mode is known as the "umbrella" mode, which one is this?

 1: The three bonds bend down and up simultaneously like an umbrella 

6.How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia?

 2(at 1089.54cm-1, 1693.95cm-1): Although there are 6 modes of vibrations and 4 different frequencies, the vibrations at 3461.29cm-1, 3589.82cm-1 are IR inactive as
 they have no change in dipole. The two bands are due to 1800cm-1: H-N-H scissoring, 1000cm-1: N-H wagging.[1].

Charge analysis

Charge on N-atom: -1.125

Charge on H-atom: 0.375

Negative charge is expected on the N-atom as it is more electronegative than the H-atoms, drawing the electrons towards itself. As a result, the positive lies on the H-atom.

N2

Summary

molecule                N2
Calculation Method	RB3LYP
Basis Set	        6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP)	        -109.52412868 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm	0.00000365 a.u.
Point Group	        D*H

Geometric Information

Bong length: 1.10550Å

Bond angle: 180°

Items

      Item                 Value      Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000006     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000006     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000002     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000003     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-1.248809D-11
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
                           ----------------------------
                           !   Optimized Parameters   !
                           ! (Angstroms and Degrees)  !
 --------------------------                            --------------------------
 ! Name  Definition              Value          Derivative Info.                !
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ! R1    R(1,2)                  1.1055         -DE/DX =    0.0                 !
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jmol dynamic image of N2

N2

Link to completed N2 optimization

File:KWUNDAHYE N2 OPT.LOG

Vibrational Analysis

1.How many modes do you expect from the 3N-5 rule?

3(2)-5 = 1 mode

2.Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations?

 1: Stretching as the bond lengths are changing

3.Which mode is highly symmetric?

 1 as the two atoms are stretching in and out simultaneously to the same extent.

4.How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous nitrogen?

 Although the molecule vibrates at 2457.31cm-1, there will be no bands seen
 in the experimental spectrum as there is no change in dipole moment in this
 symmetrical molecule, resulting the molecule to be IR inactive.

Charge analysis

Charge on N atoms: 0


H2

Summary

Molecule                H2
Calculation Method	RB3LYP
Basis Set	        6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP)	        -1.17853930 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm	0.00012170 a.u.
Point Group	        D*H

Geometric Information

Bond length=0.74309Å

Bond angle=180°

Items

    Item                  Value       Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000211     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000211     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000278     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000393     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-5.852867D-08
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
                           ----------------------------
                           !   Optimized Parameters   !
                           ! (Angstroms and Degrees)  !
 --------------------------                            --------------------------
 ! Name  Definition              Value          Derivative Info.                !
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ! R1    R(1,2)                  0.7431         -DE/DX =   -0.0002              !
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jmol dynamic image of H2

H2

Link to completed H2 optimization

File:KWUNDAHYE H2 OPT2.LOG

Vibrational Analysis

1.How many modes do you expect from the 3N-5 rule?

 3(2)-5 = 1 mode

2.Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations?

 1: bond stretch as there is a change in bond lengths

3.Which mode is highly symmetric?

 1

4.How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous hydrogen?

 Although there is bond stretch at 4461.48cm-1, similar to N2,
 H2 is a symmetrical molecule with no change in dipole. Hence, it is also IR
 inactive so there is no band seen in an experimental spectrum.


Charge analysis

charge on H atoms: 0


Calculations of ΔE for NH3

N2+3H2->2NH3

E(NH3)= -56.55776873 a.u.

2*E(NH3)= -113.11553746 a.u.

E(N2)= -109.52412868 a.u.

E(H2)= -1.17853930 a.u.

3*E(H2)= -3.53561790 a.u.

ΔE=2*E(NH3)-[E(N2)+3*E(H2)]= -0.05579088 a.u. = -146.48 kJ/mol

The ammonia product is more stable than the gaseous reactants as the energy change of the reaction is negative, which tells us that the energy of the ammonia product is lower in energy and the gaseous reactants lose energy to form the ammonia product. The lower its energy, the more stable it is. Therefore, ammonia product is more stable than the gaseous reactants.

F2

Summary

Calculation Method	RB3LYP
Basis Set	        6-31G(d,p)
E(RB3LYP)	        -199.49825212 a.u.
RMS Gradient Norm	0.00014444 a.u.
Point Group	        D*H

Geometric analysis

Bond length=1.40330Å

Bond angle=180°

Items

 
   Item                   Value       Threshold  Converged?
 Maximum Force            0.000250     0.000450     YES
 RMS     Force            0.000250     0.000300     YES
 Maximum Displacement     0.000308     0.001800     YES
 RMS     Displacement     0.000435     0.001200     YES
 Predicted change in Energy=-7.696489D-08
 Optimization completed.
    -- Stationary point found.
                           ----------------------------
                           !   Optimized Parameters   !
                           ! (Angstroms and Degrees)  !
 --------------------------                            --------------------------
 ! Name  Definition              Value          Derivative Info.                !
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ! R1    R(1,2)                  1.4033         -DE/DX =   -0.0003              !
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jmol dynamic image of F2

F2

Link to completed F2 optimization

File:KWUNDAHYE F2 OPT.LOG

Vibrational Analysis

1.How many modes do you expect from the 3N-5 rule?

 3(2)-5 = 1 mode

2.Which modes are "bending" vibrations and which are "bond stretch" vibrations?

 1: bond stretch as the bond lengths change

3.How many bands would you expect to see in an experimental spectrum of gaseous Fluorine?

 There is a vibration at 1063.53cm-1 but this will not result in a band in
 an experimental spectrum as the molecule is IR inactive because it has no change in
 dipole due to the symmetry.

Charge Analysis

Charge on F atoms=0

Energy of F2

-199.49825212 a.u. = -125187.10 kJ/mol

Molecular Orbitals

[2]

Image 1: LUMO

The above orbital is the LUMO and it is the 3σ*u. It has the highest orbital energy as it has the most number of nodes. F2 accepts electrons in this orbital.


Image 2: HOMO

The HOMO of F2 is the 1π*g. Electrons are donated from this orbital.


Image 3

This is the bonding orbital, 1πu of pz orbitals from each F. Px and py are non-bonding orbitals due to the incorrect geometry.


Image 4

This is the filled sigma anti-bonding orbital, 2σ*g. The two 2s orbitals from each F contribute to this orbital.


Image 5

This is the sigma bonding orbital, 2σg. The two 2s atomic orbitals from each F atom contributes to this orbital. There is no mixing between the 2s and 2p orbitals of F as they are too different in energy.

References

  1. COBLENTZ NO. 8751
  2. Staley, J. O. E. (n.d.). Molecular. Education.