User contributions for Ylc17

3 May 2019

• 14:2414:24, 3 May 2019 diff hist +4 MRD:01339518 →Discuss how the distribution of energy between different modes (vibration and translation) affect the efficiency of the reaction and how this is influenced by the position of the transition state
• 13:4613:46, 3 May 2019 diff hist +133 MRD:01339518 →"In light of the fact that energy is conserved, discuss the mechanism of release of the reaction energy. Explain how this could be confirmed experimentally"
• 13:4413:44, 3 May 2019 diff hist +1 MRD:01339518 →"By inspecting the potential energy surfaces, classify the F + H2 and H + HF reactions according to their energetics (endothermic or exothermic). How does this relate to the bond strength of the chemical species involved?"
• 13:4113:41, 3 May 2019 diff hist +2 MRD:01339518 →In light of the fact that energy is conserved, discuss the mechanism of release of the reaction energy. Explain how this could be confirmed experimentally
• 13:3413:34, 3 May 2019 diff hist 0 MRD:01339518 →In light of the fact that energy is conserved, discuss the mechanism of release of the reaction energy. Explain how this could be confirmed experimentally
• 13:3313:33, 3 May 2019 diff hist +98 MRD:01339518 →Exercise 2
• 13:3213:32, 3 May 2019 diff hist 0 N File:MRDYLCPHF.PNG No edit summary current
• 13:2913:29, 3 May 2019 diff hist −18 MRD:01339518 →"By inspecting the potential energy surfaces, classify the F + H2 and H + HF reactions according to their energetics (endothermic or exothermic). How does this relate to the bond strength of the chemical species involved?"
• 13:2613:26, 3 May 2019 diff hist +130 MRD:01339518 →In light of the fact that energy is conserved, discuss the mechanism of release of the reaction energy. Explain how this could be confirmed experimentally
• 13:2213:22, 3 May 2019 diff hist +1 MRD:01339518 →"By inspecting the potential energy surfaces, classify the F + H2 and H + HF reactions according to their energetics (endothermic or exothermic). How does this relate to the bond strength of the chemical species involved?"
• 13:2113:21, 3 May 2019 diff hist −1 MRD:01339518 →"By inspecting the potential energy surfaces, classify the F + H2 and H + HF reactions according to their energetics (endothermic or exothermic). How does this relate to the bond strength of the chemical species involved?"
• 13:2113:21, 3 May 2019 diff hist +2 MRD:01339518 →Exercise 2
• 13:2013:20, 3 May 2019 diff hist +1 MRD:01339518 →"By inspecting the potential energy surfaces, classify the F + H2 and H + HF reactions according to their energetics (endothermic or exothermic). How does this relate to the bond strength of the chemical species involved?"
• 13:1913:19, 3 May 2019 diff hist +17 MRD:01339518 →"By inspecting the potential energy surfaces, classify the F + H2 and H + HF reactions according to their energetics (endothermic or exothermic). How does this relate to the bond strength of the chemical species involved?"
• 13:1813:18, 3 May 2019 diff hist +14 MRD:01339518 →Discuss how the distribution of energy between different modes (vibration and translation) affect the efficiency of the reaction and how this is influenced by the position of the transition state
• 13:1813:18, 3 May 2019 diff hist −2 MRD:01339518 →Discuss how the distribution of energy between different modes (vibration and translation) affect the efficiency of the reaction and how this is influenced by the position of the transition state
• 13:1713:17, 3 May 2019 diff hist −6 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 13:1613:16, 3 May 2019 diff hist +6 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 13:1613:16, 3 May 2019 diff hist +180 MRD:01339518 No edit summary
• 13:1413:14, 3 May 2019 diff hist +203 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 12:5412:54, 3 May 2019 diff hist +81 MRD:01339518 No edit summary
• 12:5312:53, 3 May 2019 diff hist +19 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 12:4512:45, 3 May 2019 diff hist −11 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 12:4512:45, 3 May 2019 diff hist +19 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 11:5611:56, 3 May 2019 diff hist +2 MRD:01339518 →Comment on how the mep and the trajectory you calculate differ.
• 11:5511:55, 3 May 2019 diff hist +47 MRD:01339518 →Comment on how the mep and the trajectory you calculate differ.
• 11:3911:39, 3 May 2019 diff hist +100 MRD:01339518 →Report estimate of rts. Explain with internuclear distances vs time plot for relevant trajectory.
• 11:2711:27, 3 May 2019 diff hist +123 MRD:01339518 →"Transition state definition, identification, and distinguishment from a local minimum of a potential energy surface."
• 09:5509:55, 3 May 2019 diff hist +72 MRD:01339518 →Report estimate of rts. Explain with internuclear distances vs time plot for relevant trajectory.
• 09:5009:50, 3 May 2019 diff hist +4 MRD:01339518 →Transition state definition, identification, and distinguishment from a local minimum of a potential energy surface.
• 09:5009:50, 3 May 2019 diff hist −1 MRD:01339518 →Transition state definition, identification, and distinguishment from a local minimum of a potential energy surface.

2 May 2019

• 21:5221:52, 2 May 2019 diff hist +55 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 21:5221:52, 2 May 2019 diff hist +167 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 21:4821:48, 2 May 2019 diff hist +65 MRD:01339518 →"By inspecting the potential energy surfaces, classify the F + H2 and H + HF reactions according to their energetics (endothermic or exothermic). How does this relate to the bond strength of the chemical species involved?"
• 21:4721:47, 2 May 2019 diff hist 0 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 21:3521:35, 2 May 2019 diff hist +260 MRD:01339518 →"Complete the table above by adding the total energy, whether the trajectory is reactive or unreactive, and provide a plot of the trajectory and a small description for what happens along the trajectory. What can you conclude from the table?"
• 21:3121:31, 2 May 2019 diff hist −121 MRD:01339518 →Comment on how the mep and the trajectory you calculate differ.
• 21:2921:29, 2 May 2019 diff hist +845 MRD:01339518 →Comment on how the mep and the trajectory you calculate differ.
• 20:3820:38, 2 May 2019 diff hist +155 MRD:01339518 →In light of the fact that energy is conserved, discuss the mechanism of release of the reaction energy. Explain how this could be confirmed experimentally
• 19:0519:05, 2 May 2019 diff hist +121 MRD:01339518 →In light of the fact that energy is conserved, discuss the mechanism of release of the reaction energy. Explain how this could be confirmed experimentally
• 17:2317:23, 2 May 2019 diff hist +17 MRD:01339518 →In light of the fact that energy is conserved, discuss the mechanism of release of the reaction energy. Explain how this could be confirmed experimentally
• 17:1817:18, 2 May 2019 diff hist +30 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 17:1617:16, 2 May 2019 diff hist +118 MRD:01339518 →State main assumptions of transition state theory. Given the results, how do TS theory predictions compare to experimental values for reaction rates?
• 16:3916:39, 2 May 2019 diff hist +384 MRD:01339518 →Position of transition state and activation energy
• 16:2116:21, 2 May 2019 diff hist −37 MRD:01339518 →Position of transition state and activation energy
• 16:1916:19, 2 May 2019 diff hist +55 MRD:01339518 →Position of transition state and activation energy
• 15:5115:51, 2 May 2019 diff hist +13 MRD:01339518 →Position of transition state and activation energy
• 15:2915:29, 2 May 2019 diff hist +8 MRD:01339518 →Position of transition state and activation energy
• 15:0715:07, 2 May 2019 diff hist +13 MRD:01339518 →Position of transition state and activation energy
• 14:5014:50, 2 May 2019 diff hist +72 MRD:01339518 →Report estimate of rts. Explain with internuclear distances vs time plot for relevant trajectory.