User contributions
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 12:23, 11 March 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+1,276) . . N Talk:Mod:NightAngel (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Good to see you’re investigating the literature. Would have been nice to see some quantitative data put to the levels of strain in each alkene. 1.2.2 NAD: Excellen...) (current)
- 15:30, 10 March 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+2,325) . . N Talk:Mod1:yz908 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Your energies are good, nice to see the differences clearly stated for the reader. Your explanation of kinetic vs thermodynamic control is a little shaky. Good to see y...) (current)
- 10:00, 2 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+767) . . N Talk:Mod:cg507 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: jmols? Why is the endo isomer preferred? Why is product 4 preferred? Where is your analysis? 1.2.2 NAD: Sterics are the reason the Grignard reagent attacks on the sa...) (current)
- 09:59, 2 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+1,408) . . N Talk:Mod:gHoST wriTER (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Where are the jmols? A diagram would have helped in your discussion of thermo and kinetic control. Nice to see you’re taking the limitations of MM into account. Some...) (current)
- 09:58, 2 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+1,571) . . N Talk:Mod:130290nayr (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Looks fine. 1.2.2 NAD: Symmetry? There is no six membered ring to change the conformation of! What specific interaction causes the Grignard to attack above the ring? ...) (current)
- 12:00, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+785) . . N Talk:Mod:swheeler1 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Good to see you’re aware of the limitations of and MM approach. However, you cannot compare the energies of the endo dimer to its hydrogenation product as they are not...) (current)
- 12:00, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+884) . . N Talk:Mod:pnr08mod1 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Your jmol structures are all mixed up! What structural aspects of the isomers lead to the differences in energy? 1.2.2 NAD: Is the opposite face of the molecule that...) (current)
- 12:00, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+806) . . N Talk:Mod:ir208 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: An interesting number of significant figures here. Good to see you’re relating energy to structural terms. Good lit citations. 1.2.2 NAD: Tables and graphs are much...) (current)
- 11:59, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+948) . . N Talk:Mod1:p.thakrar (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Your energies are correct and your discussion is good. Also good to see you’re aware of the limitations of a molecular mechanics approach to modelling. 1.2.2 NAD: ...) (current)
- 11:59, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+845) . . N Talk:Mod:wsc108 module1 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Excellent discussion, your energies are fine. 1.2.2 NAD: Good discussion and a nice contrast of MM2 vs PM6. Also nice to see your optimisation presented graphically. ...) (current)
- 11:59, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+868) . . N Talk:Mod:nightfox (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Excellent answer, well discussed and referenced. 1.2.2 NAD: Another excellent answer. Good to see your optimisation presented graphically (very few people think to do ...) (current)
- 11:59, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+1,687) . . N Talk:Mod:1sadia (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Your structures are wrong, this may explain why your energies are slightly off. A more in-depth discussion on the structural differences between 3 and 4 would have been ...) (current)
- 11:59, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+898) . . N Talk:Mod:12dschubertroad (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Your answer is correct but it is lacking any real discussion. For instance, why are there differences in the energies of 3 and 4? Are there any particular structural di...) (current)
- 11:59, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+1,264) . . N Talk:Org:pswallow89 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: Nice to see you’ve thought outside of the question (your example of the diels alder with cyclopentene). Bit of a muddled answer for the hydrogenation products. MM mod...) (current)
- 11:58, 1 February 2011 (diff | hist) . . (+869) . . N Talk:Mod1:lcs11 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp dimers: It is not valid to compare the energies of 3 or 4 to 2 as they are not isomers. Your energies look fine, good discussion. 1.2.2 NAD: Nice to see your optimisation was b...) (current)
- 14:28, 10 March 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+2,078) . . N Talk:Mod:victoriasponge8 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp Dimers: Are you sure kinetic control gives only one product, while thermodynamic gives a mixture? I assume you mean ‘alleviating’ rather than ‘elevating’? Are there no o...) (current)
- 14:27, 10 March 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+1,952) . . N Talk:Mod:cc1007 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp Dimers: Would have been nice to see the Jmol structures. Good that you’re relating energies to structural features. Do the higher bending energies of 3 really outweigh those...) (current)
- 14:27, 10 March 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+1,121) . . N Talk:Mod:osef-module1 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp Dimers: Would have been nice to see some Jmol structures. Energies are correct even though the structures you have drawn are wrong, slightly odd that. Under kinetic control wou...) (current)
- 15:16, 4 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (-34) . . Talk:Denzel (current)
- 15:12, 4 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+82) . . Talk:Module1:doushinidecuoqingyiaishangwo (current)
- 15:09, 4 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+283) . . Talk:Mod:MeWantA (current)
- 15:02, 4 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+89) . . Talk:Mod:LOTR1 (current)
- 12:50, 3 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+1,348) . . N Talk:Module1:doushinidecuoqingyiaishangwo (New page: 1.2.1 Cp Dimers: Well layed out and clearly stated answer, good work! Nice to see Jmol structures. The individual energy contributions for 3/4 are actually different enough for a compar...)
- 12:49, 3 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+2) . . Talk:Mod:MeWantA
- 12:48, 3 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+1,268) . . Talk:Mod:MeWantA
- 12:47, 3 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+1,269) . . N Talk:Mod:LOTR1 (New page: 1.2.1 Cp Dimers: Would have been nice to see Jmol structures. Your energies are correct but you have assigned them to the wrong dimers (ie exo is 31.9 and endo is 34)! The reaction is i...)
- 12:15, 3 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+79) . . Talk:Denzel
- 10:14, 3 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+433) . . Talk:Denzel
- 10:09, 3 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+216) . . Talk:Mod:gzus (current)
- 17:35, 2 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+820) . . Talk:Denzel
- 17:32, 2 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+78) . . Talk:Mod:gzus
- 12:16, 2 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+73) . . N Talk:Denzel (New page: 1.2.1 Cp Dimers: 1.2.2 NAD: 1.2.3 Taxol: 1.3.1 Carbene: Mini-Project:)
- 12:14, 2 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (-1) . . Talk:Mod:gzus
- 12:13, 2 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (-1) . . Talk:Mod:gzus
- 12:12, 2 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+850) . . Talk:Mod:gzus
- 10:28, 2 February 2010 (diff | hist) . . (+73) . . N Talk:Mod:gzus (New page: 1.2.1 Cp Dimers: 1.2.2 NAD: 1.2.3 Taxol: 1.3.1 Carbene: Mini-Project:)
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
