MRD:ED2618
Molecular Reaction Dynamics
In this lab we are using molecular dynamic trajectories to study the reactivity of triatomic systems, namely when an atom collides with a diatomic molecule.
ADD CONTENTS TABLE
EXERCISE 1: H + H2 system
Dynamics from the transition state region
Question 1: On a potential energy surface diagram, how is the transition state mathematically defined? How can the transition state be identified, and how can it be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface?
Answer 1: On a potential energy surface diagram the transition state is defined, mathematically, as a saddle point. A transition state is the maximum energy present in the minimum energy pathway taken from reactants to products. A saddle point is of symmetric configuration at which the distance between three separate atoms is the same.
A saddle point is different to a local minima. For both, the gradient of the potential energy surface is zero, is given as the first partial derivative:
∂V(ri)/ ∂ri = 0
However, the saddle point and local minima may be distinguished though inspection of their second partial derivatives. For a local minima, calculating partial second derivatives in orthogonal directions to the saddle point will give a result that is greater than 0, independent from which plane it has been measured. By contrast, for the saddle point, is second partial derivative will either be greater than zero or smaller than zero dependent on which plane it has been measured. This explanation is summarised below:
For a local minima: ∂2V(ri)/ ∂ri2 > 0
For a saddle point: ∂2V(ri)/ ∂ri2 > 0 and ∂2V(ri)/ ∂ri2 < 0
An example of a saddle point can be seen in the figure below:
Question 2: Report your best estimate of the transition state position (rts) and explain your reasoning illustrating it with a “Internuclear Distances vs Time” plot for a relevant trajectory.
Answer 2: The transition state occurs at the saddle point, which is of symmetric configuration. Hence, r1 = r2 as the H + H2 surface is symmetric, where, r1 = BC and r2 = AB. At the transition state p1 = p2 = 0 g.mol-1.pm.fs-1. Through trial and error an estimate for the transition state position is when AB = BC = 90.75 pm. Using this distance produces the contour plot below. It can be seen that there is no gradient at right angles to the point of the transition state.
The plot of 'Internuclear Distances vs Time' below shows the distances of A-B, B-C, and A-C constant with time, consolidating the fact that this position is the transition state position. Running an animation with the r1 = r2 = 90.75 pm shows the species as stationary, as there are no fluctuations of interatomic distance with time.
Question 3: Comment on how the mep and the trajectory you just calculated differ.Answer 3: The initial conditions are set so that the system is slightly displaced from the transition state and so that there is zero initial momenta, where r1 = rts + 1 pm, r2 = rts and the momenta p1 = p2 = 0 g.mol-1.pm.fs-1. This can be shown in the figures below, where r1 (BC) = 91.75 pm and r2 (AB) = 90.75 pm.
It can be deduced that the trajectory is greatly dependent on calculation type. To obtain a complete MEP the step number was increased to 3000.