MRD:01340064

From ChemWiki
Revision as of 16:50, 7 May 2019 by Jtw3017 (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Comp Lab

On a potential energy surface diagram, how is the transition state mathematically defined? How can the transition state be identified, and how can it be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface?

The transition state is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path linking reactants and the products.

The point on the potential energy surface can be identified as where the gradient of the potential is zero, and the energy goes down most steeply along the minimum energy path linking reactants and products.

At the transition state, if you change the geometry by a small amount in the direction of the products it will roll towards the products. The same thing would happen for for the reactants. Therefore another method of locating the transition state would be to start trajectories near it and see whether they roll to the reactants or products.

Report your best estimate of the transition state position (rts) and explain your reasoning illustrating it with a “Internuclear Distances vs Time” plot for a relevant trajectory.

My best estimate of the transition state position is 0.908 A

Jwq2.pngJwq2.1.png

The first figure shows the internuclear distances vs time plot when r1=r2=0.908. The second figure shows the system rolling towards the reactants after a minor geometry change of 0.001 A towards the reactants.

Comment on how the mep and the trajectory you just calculated differ.


Screenshot 2019-05-07 at 15.34.56.pngScreenshot 2019-05-07 at 15.35.43.png


The mep follows the valley floor to H1+ H2-H3 without any indication of vibration in the molecule, the dynamic trajectory shows a more realistic account of the motion of the atoms as it shows the vibration in the molecule.

Complete the table by adding the total energy, whether the trajectory is reactive or unreactive, and provide a plot of the trajectory and a small description for what happens along the trajectory. What can you conclude from the table?

p1 p2 Etot Reactive?  Description of the dynamics
-1.25  -2.5  -98.956 Yes The trajectory runs through the transition state to the products
-1.5  -2.0  -100.456 No The trajectory stops before reaching the transition state
-1.5  -2.5  -98.956 Yes The trajectory runs through the transition state to the products
-2.5  -5.0  -84.956 No unreactive trajectory bounces off the barrier or its surroundings and regenerate the reactants.
-2.5  -5.2  -83.416 Yes The trajectory bounces at the barrier first and then runs through the transition state to the products

Not all trajectories starting with the same positions but with higher values of momenta are reactive.


[[File:Screenshot 2019-05-07 at 15.55.55.png]|291x291px]] [[File:Screenshot 2019-05-07 at 15.56.19.png]|291x291px]] [[File:Screenshot 2019-05-07 at 15.56.35.png]|291x291px]] [[File:Screenshot 2019-05-07 at 15.57.23.png]|291x291px]] [[File:Screenshot 2019-05-07 at 15.57.40.png]|291x291px]]