User contributions for Alana

12:4712:47, 30 November 2010 diff hist +142 Talk:Mod:xxyte35134 No edit summary current
12:4112:41, 30 November 2010 diff hist +434 N Talk:Mod:xxyte35134 New page: Another outstanding piece of work! Epoxidation of 3: you've over-complicated this with your orbital analysis...the epoxidation simply goes on the more electron rich alkene (the other one i...
12:3112:31, 30 November 2010 diff hist +37 N Talk:Mod:xxyte35133 New page: Wow - amazingly detailed. Well done! current
12:1412:14, 30 November 2010 diff hist +149 N Talk:Mod:xxyte35132 New page: Excellent. Again, would have been good to give the energy value for each isomer, rather than the difference between them, to allow me to check them! current
12:0912:09, 30 November 2010 diff hist +25 Talk:Mod:xxyte35131 No edit summary current
12:0712:07, 30 November 2010 diff hist +293 N Talk:Mod:xxyte35131 New page: Again, great detail. Note that the reaction is stereoselective, not stereospecific, even if it gives one isomer. Also, attack from both faces would NOT give a racemic product - it would...
12:0312:03, 30 November 2010 diff hist +187 N Talk:Mod:xxyte35130 New page: Spectacular presentation with a lot of extra information! Would have been good to give the total energy for each structure, to enable comparison, rather than just quoting the difference. current
11:5211:52, 30 November 2010 diff hist +547 Talk:Mod:elle0000 No edit summary current
11:4111:41, 30 November 2010 diff hist +72 Talk:Mod:elle0000 No edit summary
11:3611:36, 30 November 2010 diff hist +120 N Talk:Mod:elle0000 New page: Cp: Good NAD: Good Taxol: Your two structures both have the carbonyl "down", which is why they are so similar in energy!
11:1411:14, 30 November 2010 diff hist +423 Talk:Grt07:breakyourself No edit summary current
11:0811:08, 30 November 2010 diff hist +284 Talk:Grt07:breakyourself No edit summary
11:0411:04, 30 November 2010 diff hist +189 Talk:Grt07:breakyourself No edit summary
10:5910:59, 30 November 2010 diff hist +169 Talk:Grt07:breakyourself No edit summary
10:5410:54, 30 November 2010 diff hist +86 Nm Talk:Grt07:breakyourself New page: Cp: Structures and energies good. Why is the endo-isomer kinetically preferred? NAD:
10:4810:48, 30 November 2010 diff hist +448 Talk:Mod:shaneomar No edit summary current
10:4410:44, 30 November 2010 diff hist +85 Talk:Mod:shaneomar No edit summary
10:4110:41, 30 November 2010 diff hist +335 Talk:Mod:shaneomar No edit summary
10:3610:36, 30 November 2010 diff hist +76 N Talk:Mod:shaneomar New page: Cp: Energies and structures good. Why is the endo-TS lower in energy? NAD:
10:3310:33, 30 November 2010 diff hist 0 Talk:Mod:tb12 No edit summary current
10:3210:32, 30 November 2010 diff hist +524 Talk:Mod:tb12 No edit summary
10:2610:26, 30 November 2010 diff hist +20 Talk:Mod:tb12 No edit summary
10:1410:14, 30 November 2010 diff hist +169 Talk:Mod:tb12 No edit summary
10:1110:11, 30 November 2010 diff hist +13 Talk:Mod:tb12 No edit summary
10:0910:09, 30 November 2010 diff hist +106 N Talk:Mod:tb12 New page: Cp: Energies and structures fine. Why is the endo isomer kinetically preferred? Why is 3 strained? NAD:
10:0510:05, 30 November 2010 diff hist +99 Talk:Mod:jamesmac No edit summary current
10:0210:02, 30 November 2010 diff hist +777 Talk:Mod:jamesmac No edit summary
09:5509:55, 30 November 2010 diff hist +230 Talk:Mod:jamesmac No edit summary
09:5109:51, 30 November 2010 diff hist +168 Talk:Mod:jamesmac No edit summary
09:4509:45, 30 November 2010 diff hist +159 Talk:Mod:jamesmac No edit summary
09:4109:41, 30 November 2010 diff hist +170 Talk:Mod:jamesmac No edit summary
09:3609:36, 30 November 2010 diff hist +402 N Talk:Mod:jamesmac New page: Cp: Energies for 1 and 2 are OK; those for 3 and 4 are off slightly (although they are the right way round). Why is the endo-isomer kinetically preferred? What structural features cause t...
09:3009:30, 30 November 2010 diff hist 0 Talk:Mod123CLMAFC No edit summary current
09:2909:29, 30 November 2010 diff hist +623 Talk:Mod123CLMAFC No edit summary
09:2409:24, 30 November 2010 diff hist +246 Talk:Mod123CLMAFC No edit summary
09:2009:20, 30 November 2010 diff hist +127 Talk:Mod123CLMAFC No edit summary
09:0909:09, 30 November 2010 diff hist +105 N Talk:Mod123CLMAFC New page: Cp: Energies and structures all look fine. What structural features are responsible for the strain in 3?

16:1816:18, 29 November 2010 diff hist +249 Talk:Mod:tmlkmcd No edit summary current
16:0816:08, 29 November 2010 diff hist +82 Talk:Mod:tmlkmcd No edit summary
16:0416:04, 29 November 2010 diff hist +77 Talk:Mod:tmlkmcd No edit summary
15:5815:58, 29 November 2010 diff hist +13 Talk:Mod:tmlkmcd No edit summary
15:5615:56, 29 November 2010 diff hist +44 Talk:Mod:tmlkmcd No edit summary
15:5015:50, 29 November 2010 diff hist +143 Talk:Mod:tmlkmcd No edit summary
15:4515:45, 29 November 2010 diff hist +139 N Talk:Mod:tmlkmcd New page: Intro: you seem to be referring to molecular mechanics, not molecular modelling - the latter does include e.g. ab initio calculations! Cp:

15:5115:51, 26 October 2010 diff hist −7 Talk:Mod1:axg2010autumn No edit summary current
15:5015:50, 26 October 2010 diff hist +420 Talk:Mod1:axg2010autumn No edit summary
15:4115:41, 26 October 2010 diff hist +411 Talk:Mod1:axg2010autumn No edit summary
15:3415:34, 26 October 2010 diff hist +542 N Talk:Mod1:axg2010autumn New page: Cp: Energies for the structures OK (although you've given too many dec. places). Note that it is perfectly possible for a product to be preferred kinetically AND thermodynamically - i.e....
15:2215:22, 26 October 2010 diff hist +874 Talk:ModOne:hhlk2010 No edit summary current
15:0815:08, 26 October 2010 diff hist +73 Talk:ModOne:hhlk2010 No edit summary

30 November 2010

29 November 2010

26 October 2010