<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Yh9718</id>
	<title>ChemWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Yh9718"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/Yh9718"/>
	<updated>2026-05-30T15:56:42Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801108</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801108"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T20:44:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure, where A, B and C denote the F, H and H atom respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule (represented by the periodically oscillating AB line) and a translating atom (represented by the horizontal BC line). As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy and translational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801080</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801080"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T20:27:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure, where A, B and C denote the F, H and H atom respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule (represented by the periodically oscillating AB line) and a translating atom (represented by the horizontal BC line). As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy and translational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801077</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801077"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T20:27:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* F + H2 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  /g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; /g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; /kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure, where A, B and C denote the F, H and H atom respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule (represented by the periodically oscillating AB line) and a translating atom (represented by the horizontal BC line). As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy and translational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801075</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801075"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T20:26:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  /g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; /g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; /kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure, where A, B and C denote the F, H and H atom respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule (represented by the periodically oscillating AB line) and a translating atom (represented by the horizontal BC line). As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy and translational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801069</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801069"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T20:23:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* PES inspection */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure, where A, B and C denote the F, H and H atom respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule (represented by the periodically oscillating AB line) and a translating atom (represented by the horizontal BC line). As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy and translational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801019</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801019"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:50:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure, where A, B and C denote the F, H and H atom respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule (represented by the periodically oscillating AB line) and a translating atom (represented by the horizontal BC line). As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy and translational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801011</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801011"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:47:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* F - H - H system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801002</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801002"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:42:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + HF */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801000</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=801000"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:41:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* F - H - H system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800999</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800999"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:38:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800997</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800997"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:38:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800995</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800995"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:36:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800989</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800989"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:35:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the tunneling effect and the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. It is shown by the simulation that it is possible for the trajectory to go pass the transition state whereas still be unsuccessful, however in the transition state theory it is considered as a reactive trajectory. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction, and hence the rate is overestimated by the transition state theory. Tunneling effect makes the reaction with insufficient energy to overcome the energy barrier feasible, but this effect influences both forward and backward reaction, and hence will not affect the rate predicted by the transition state theory by a lot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800978</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800978"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:23:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, there is no change in distance over time and hence no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800975</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800975"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T19:22:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800747</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800747"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T16:27:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Polanyi J. Concepts in reaction dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1972;5(5):161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800743</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800743"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T16:22:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy.This could be determined by infrared emission spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR emission spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to decay from higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The use of infrared chemiluminescence helps determine the contribution from different modes. IR chemiluminescence shows the variation of the rate constant with respect to change in vibrational, rotational and translational quantum numbers. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;It is useful to find which combination of vibrational, rotational and translational states gives the maximum rate constant, and hence determine how different modes affect the reaction trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800678</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800678"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T15:21:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;POLANYI J. Some Concepts in Reaction Dynamics. Science. 1987;236(4802):680-690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800677</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800677"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T15:19:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Polanyi, the translational energy is more effective to  make the reaction proceed when an early transition state is present, and the vibrational energy is more effective in prompting the reaction when having a late transition state. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Polanyi&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800618</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800618"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:27:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800616</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800616"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:26:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: Undo revision 800615 by Yh9718 (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800615</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800615"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:26:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800614</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800614"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:25:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800613</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800613"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:24:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800612</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800612"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:23:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* F - H - H system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour Plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800611</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800611"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:21:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is clearly seen in the surface plot that the transition state locates very close to the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; side. As a result, the F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reaction has a early transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the reactants; the H + HF reaction has a late transition state where the structure of the transition state resembles the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800600</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800600"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:14:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800592</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800592"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:04:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800591</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800591"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:04:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png|left|250px|thumb| Momenta vs Time Plot at chosen initial conditions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A chosen set of initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 180 pm&lt;br /&gt;
r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The momenta vs time plot for this trajectory is shown in the figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the plot, it can be observed that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png&amp;diff=800587</id>
		<title>File:FHH 180 -1 74 -1 2000 0.1.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_180_-1_74_-1_2000_0.1.png&amp;diff=800587"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T14:03:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800509</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800509"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T13:00:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + HF */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800506</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800506"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:57:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* F + H2 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800498</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800498"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:52:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + HF */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 180.250 || 74.484 || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png&amp;diff=800497</id>
		<title>File:FHH 180 0 74 0 1000 0.4 energy mep.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_energy_mep.png&amp;diff=800497"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:52:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png&amp;diff=800496</id>
		<title>File:FHH 180 0 74 0 1000 0.4 contour mep.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_180_0_74_0_1000_0.4_contour_mep.png&amp;diff=800496"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:51:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800493</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800493"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:50:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* F + H2 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ MEP when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! Contour plot !! Energy vs Time plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 181.250 || 75.484 || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png&amp;diff=800491</id>
		<title>File:FHH 181 0 75 0 1000 1 energy mep.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_energy_mep.png&amp;diff=800491"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:49:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png&amp;diff=800490</id>
		<title>File:FHH 181 0 75 0 1000 1 contour mep.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FHH_181_0_75_0_1000_1_contour_mep.png&amp;diff=800490"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:49:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800476</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800476"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:27:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly. The reversibility of the reaction reduces the rate of the forward reaction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800469</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800469"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:18:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible, hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&amp;lt;/reference&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800468</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800468"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:17:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible, hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transition Theory&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800466</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800466"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T12:15:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible, hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steinfeld J, Francisco J, Hase W. Chemical kinetics and dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 1998.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800446</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800446"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T11:54:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible, hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800439</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800439"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T11:53:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible, hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 91.774 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Type of Calculation !! Countour Plot !! Momentum vs time Plot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| MEP || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dynamics || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png|200px]] || [[File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png&amp;diff=800438</id>
		<title>File:HHH 91 0 90 0 2000 0.1 momentum dynamics.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_dynamics.png&amp;diff=800438"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T11:53:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png&amp;diff=800437</id>
		<title>File:HHH 91 0 90 0 2000 0.1 countour dynamics.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_dynamics.png&amp;diff=800437"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T11:53:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png&amp;diff=800434</id>
		<title>File:HHH 91 0 90 0 2000 0.1 momentum mep.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_momentum_mep.png&amp;diff=800434"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T11:51:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png&amp;diff=800433</id>
		<title>File:HHH 91 0 90 0 2000 0.1 countour mep.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:HHH_91_0_90_0_2000_0.1_countour_mep.png&amp;diff=800433"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T11:50:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800428</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800428"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T11:44:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible, hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]][[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]][[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]][[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800426</id>
		<title>MRD:01496067HYT</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:01496067HYT&amp;diff=800426"/>
		<updated>2020-05-08T11:33:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Yh9718: /* H + H2 system */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rts_HHH_01496067.png|thumb| internuclear distance vs time plot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 90.774 pm|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state is mathematically defined as the saddle point of a surface plot. To distinguish the transition state from the local minimum, check that if it is a maximum on another set of axis which is perpendicular to the original axis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best estimated r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 90.774 pm. As seen that the internuclear distance vs time plot show three straight horizontal lines (where AB and BC distance overlap), which suggests that the atoms are in the energy stationary point, and no oscillation is occurring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP ignores the kinetic energy of the atoms, hence no oscillation is observed in the mep plot, and it only shows the minumum energy path that the system go through while proceeding the reaction; whereas in the actual trajectory, the atoms do oscillate due to conservation of energy. The energy released after passing the activation energy barrier is converted to kinetic energy of the particles, hence the molecule vibrates and shows a curly path in the trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state theory neglects the fact that the product and the reactant are interconvertible, hence it would overestimate the rate of the reaction slightly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Reaction Trajectories at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm with different momenta&lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-2.56 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -414.28 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) slowly approaches to an H atom (C), and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) dissociates, forming a new H atom (A) and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC).|| [[File:-2.56_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-2.56-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -3.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -4.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-420.077 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before they reach each other, both the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule and H atom bounces back. No reaction takes place. || [[File:-3.1_-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]  || [[File:-3.1-4.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-3.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| -413.977 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and before as reach each other, the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, H(B)-H(C) bond forms. Both the H atom (A) and the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) move in direction opposite to their initial direction, and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates. || [[File:-3.1_-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-3.1-5.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-357.277 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|no || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). Overall no reaction takes place. || [[File:-5.1_-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.1_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-5.1 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-10.6 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|-349.477 || style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;|yes || A vibrating molecule H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (AB) approaches an H atom (C), and the H(A)-H(B) bond breaks, the H(B)-H(C) bond forms. The newly formed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) vibrates so violently that as the H(B) atom in the molecule reaches the H(A) atom, it reforms the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) and an H atom (C). The reformed H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (AB) vibrates once and the H(B) atom is reattracted to the H(C) atom, forming the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; molecule (BC) again.  || [[File:-5.1_-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]] || [[File:-5.1-10.6_HHH_01496067.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A brief conclusion can be drawn that the a greater momentum does not always lead to a reactive trajectory. There need to be a balance between the translational energy and vibrational energy for the reaction to be successful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F - H - H system ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== PES inspection ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Surface_plot_FHH_01496067.png|250px|thumb|A surface plot of the F-H-H system, where A=F, B=C=H]]&lt;br /&gt;
A potential surface plot is drawn, were AB is the F-H distance and BC is the H-H distance.&lt;br /&gt;
As shown in the plot, at low FH distance (i.e. A FH + H state), the potential energy is lower; at low HH distance (i.e. a H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F state), the potential energy is higher. This suggests that the reaction FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, and the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; FH + H is exothermic. From the thermodynamic nature of the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the F-H bond is much stronger than the H-H bond. The reaction  FH + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is endothermic, which suggests that the energy required for breaking the F-H bond is greater than the energy released when forming the H-H bond, hence a conclusion can be drawn that the F-H bond is stronger than the H-H bond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state position of the reaction is found at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=181.250 pm, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74.484 pm shown as a dot in the surface plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall exothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-F bond length which deviates from the transition state H-F bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-435.067 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 1.086 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-H bond length was found to be 73.999 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== H + HF ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall endothermic reaction. The activation energy could be found by the difference between minimum potential energy calculated by MEP at H-H bond length which deviates from the transition state H-H bond length for 1 pm and the transition state potential energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, the activation energy of this reaction is -433.981 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; - (-560.583 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) = 126.602 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The H-F bond length is found to be 91.997 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Reaction Dynamics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The necessary initial condition for the reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to take place is that the F-H distance is smaller than the transition state F-H distance. (i.e. r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 181.250 pm) It can be observed from the momentum vs time graph that if the reaction feasible, eventually the system would consist of a vibrating molecule and a translating atom. As a result, the excess reaction energy is released as vibrational energy. This could be determined by infrared spectroscopy. When the system lies towards the reactant side, less vibrational energy is present in the system. The most populated vibrational state would be the ground state, and the IR absorption spectrum will show a few overtones which corresponds to population to higher vibrational states. As the system moves toward the product side, the energy initially put in to overcome the activation barrier is converted to the vibrational energy. As a result, more states could be populated and hence more overtones would be observed in the spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ caption&lt;br /&gt;
!r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; pm !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;FH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;  g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !!  | Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 180 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | 74 || rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot; | -1|| -6.1 || -402.321 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.1 || -433.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1 || -431.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.1 || -426.901 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1 || -420.701 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.1 || -412.501 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.1 || -402.301 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| yes || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.1 || -390.101 ||style=&amp;quot;text-align: center;&amp;quot;| no || sth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Yh9718</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>