<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Svg14</id>
	<title>ChemWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Svg14"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/Svg14"/>
	<updated>2026-04-05T18:29:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560311</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560311"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T01:01:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Thermal expansion coefficient */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be a grid of 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice. The grid size 1x1x1 represented one primitive unit cell of MgO, containing two atoms. A 2x2x2 grid consisted of four unit cells of MgO (8 atoms) and so on. The grid size was varied throughout the experiment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method can be used to compute the vibrational modes (otherwise known as the phonon modes) of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves. &#039;&#039;Dispersion curves illustrate the branch nature of vibrational continua present in the structure and have an origin Γ. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes within the branches can also be calculated. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. The displacement a (the lattice constant) within a lattice relates to a position k in reciprocal space by k=2π/a. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.3|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560310</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560310"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T01:01:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Thermal expansion coefficient */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be a grid of 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice. The grid size 1x1x1 represented one primitive unit cell of MgO, containing two atoms. A 2x2x2 grid consisted of four unit cells of MgO (8 atoms) and so on. The grid size was varied throughout the experiment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method can be used to compute the vibrational modes (otherwise known as the phonon modes) of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves. &#039;&#039;Dispersion curves illustrate the branch nature of vibrational continua present in the structure and have an origin Γ. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes within the branches can also be calculated. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. The displacement a (the lattice constant) within a lattice relates to a position k in reciprocal space by k=2π/a. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.2|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560309</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560309"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T01:00:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* The quasi-harmonic approximation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be a grid of 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice. The grid size 1x1x1 represented one primitive unit cell of MgO, containing two atoms. A 2x2x2 grid consisted of four unit cells of MgO (8 atoms) and so on. The grid size was varied throughout the experiment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method can be used to compute the vibrational modes (otherwise known as the phonon modes) of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves. &#039;&#039;Dispersion curves illustrate the branch nature of vibrational continua present in the structure and have an origin Γ. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes within the branches can also be calculated. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. The displacement a (the lattice constant) within a lattice relates to a position k in reciprocal space by k=2π/a. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560308</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560308"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T00:57:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* The quasi-harmonic approximation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be a grid of 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice. The grid size 1x1x1 represented one primitive unit cell of MgO, containing two atoms. A 2x2x2 grid consisted of four unit cells of MgO (8 atoms) and so on. The grid size was varied throughout the experiment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method can be used to compute the vibrational modes (otherwise known as the phonon modes) of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves. &#039;&#039;Dispersion curves illustrate the branch nature of vibrational continua present in the structure. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes within the branches can also be calculated. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. The displacement a (the lattice constant) within a lattice relates to a position k in reciprocal space by k=2π/a. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560300</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560300"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T00:51:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* The quasi-harmonic approximation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be a grid of 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice. The grid size 1x1x1 represented one primitive unit cell of MgO, containing two atoms. A 2x2x2 grid consisted of four unit cells of MgO (8 atoms) and so on. The grid size was varied throughout the experiment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method can be used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes can also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. The displacement a within a lattice relates to a position k in reciprocal space by k=2π/a. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560297</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560297"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T00:48:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* The systemː MgO crystal */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be a grid of 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice. The grid size 1x1x1 represented one primitive unit cell of MgO, containing two atoms. A 2x2x2 grid consisted of four unit cells of MgO (8 atoms) and so on. The grid size was varied throughout the experiment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560293</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560293"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T00:46:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be a grid of 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560291</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560291"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T00:45:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Calculating the phonon modes of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560288</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560288"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T00:44:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Calculating the phonon modes of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom. [[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=2.5|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560281</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560281"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T00:41:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom. [[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560280</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=560280"/>
		<updated>2016-10-21T00:40:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* The quasi-harmonic approximation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1 R. Hoffmann, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. English, 1987, 26, 846–878. DOI: 10.1002/anie.198708461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Harrison, presented at Imperial College London as a third year undergraduate lecture, date unknown, http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom. [[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;1 M. Matsui, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 91, 489. DOI: 10.1063/1.457484&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot; &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Online, &amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures due to phonon interaction. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Z. Wu and R. M. Wentzcovitch&#039;&#039;, An efficient method to calculate the anharmonicity free energy, &#039;&#039;2006, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0606745 (accessed October 2016)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559948</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559948"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T18:08:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom. [[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the Helmholtz free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the Helmholtz free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical properties, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been taken into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units.  Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559940</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559940"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T18:04:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Conclusion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom. [[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been take n into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
From this experiment, the following conclusions can be drawn:&lt;br /&gt;
* The quasi-harmonic approximation was suitable for computing the coefficient of thermal expansion as the value obtained was comparable to that found in literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 16x16x16 grid was optimum as it provided a compromise between speed of simulation and the accuracy of the calculation with respect to the infinite lattice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Both methods have their flaws; the quasi-harmonic approximation fails at higher temperatures due to motions becoming anharmonic, and molecular dynamics is not appropriate for use at lower temperatures, as it is a purely classical approximation and cannot take into account quantum mechanical properties of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559933</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559933"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T17:53:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
In this experiment, various methods were used to compute the free energy and expansion coefficient of an MgO crystal. The optimum grid size in terms of speed of calculation vs accuracy was found to be 16x16x16 primitive unit cells of MgO. The quasi-harmonic approximation was the more accurate method to determine the Helmholtz free energy and lattice volume at low temperatures, whereas using molecular dynamics was the more appropriate at higher temperatures.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space and each energy level has a corresponding value of k. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithium as the interactions are not comparable to that of MgO as there is only one type of atom. [[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been take n into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559806</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559806"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T14:47:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* The quasi-harmonic approximation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The aim of this experiment was to compare methods in determining properties of an MgO crystal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are harmonic and its energy vs displacement graph has a parabolic form, i.e. that the motions lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the k-point L. L contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Had these effects not been take n into account, the graph would be linear.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559794</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559794"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T14:39:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Computing the free energy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559793</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559793"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T14:38:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Thermal expansion coefficient */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559792</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559792"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T14:37:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1.5|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1.5|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559789</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559789"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T14:36:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]] [[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|center|upright=0.8|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559736</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559736"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T14:00:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. The method follows an algorithm which sets the particles moving randomly, accelerates them according to &#039;&#039;&#039;F=ma&#039;&#039;&#039; and adjusts their velocities and positions for the next step in the calculation. This process is repeated for a desired number of timesteps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/harrison/Teaching/L4_Vibrations.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at higher temperatures, the MD method is more accurate as it supplies the atoms with energy corresponding to a certain temperature and hence adjusts the motion of the atoms accordingly. These motions may be anharmonic at high temperatures. The quasi-harmonic approximation does not take into account this anharmonicity so cannot simulate structures at high temperatures.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559716</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559716"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T13:48:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Thermal expansion coefficient */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|left|upright=1|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559714</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559714"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T13:47:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Thermal expansion coefficient */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://link.aip.org/link/JCPSA6/v91/i1/p489/s1&amp;amp;Agg=doi&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curved region appears as a result of quantum mechanical effects, specifically the zero point energy, which is the energy that a system possesses at 0 K&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;zero-point energy&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online.&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., accessed 20 Oct. 2016&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/science/zero-point-energy&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
The MD calculations were conducted on an MgO superlattice of 32 MgO units. Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
In literature&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures. The MD simulation is purely classical and does not take into account the zero-point energy that the quantum-harmonic approximation does.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559638</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559638"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:45:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Thermal expansion coefficient */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=1|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559636</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559636"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:44:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=1.7|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=2.2|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]][[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|center|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Matsui.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 7: Masanori Matsui&#039;s Molecular dynamics study of the structural and thermodynamic properties of MgO crystal with quantum correction]]&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Matsui.PNG&amp;diff=559624</id>
		<title>File:Matsui.PNG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Matsui.PNG&amp;diff=559624"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:36:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559623</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559623"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:36:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to determine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7) as opposed to MD, suggesting that the quasi-harmonic approximation is more accurate at lower temperatures.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559616</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559616"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:25:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated. Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to cermine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed using classical Newtonian mechanics in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In literature, the relationship observed experimentally matches that of the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 7).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559609</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559609"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:07:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Molecular dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along the k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198708461/epdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to cermine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559607</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559607"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:03:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to cermine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Equation_1.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Equation 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Equation_1.PNG&amp;diff=559604</id>
		<title>File:Equation 1.PNG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Equation_1.PNG&amp;diff=559604"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:00:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559601</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559601"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T12:00:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quasi-harmonic approximation was also used to optimise the structure in order to determine the coefficient of thermal expansion, α, with respect to the free energy of the structure. Equation 1 relates the volume of the unit cell to the temperature and can be used to cermine a value of α.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
The numerical calculations were carried out using a graphical user interface called DLVisualise within RedHat Linux.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559580</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559580"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T11:39:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559579</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559579"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T11:38:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559568</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559568"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:50:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Calculating the phonon modes of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure 1), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This grid size would also be appropriate to use with another metal oxide such as CaO, as the ions carry the same charges so the interactions can be treated similarly and the unit cells contain the same number of atoms. However, another optimum grid size would have to be found for a zeolite like faujasite, as the lattice does not have an FCC configuration. This grid size would not be optimal for a metal such as lithum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559567</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559567"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:43:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Calculating the phonon modes of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|left|upright=2|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559566</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559566"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:42:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=3|Figure 2: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 3: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 3). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 5: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 4 and 5. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 6: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559565</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559565"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:35:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Calculating the phonon modes of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos1_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=3|Figure 3: Density of states (Top: 1x1x1, 2x2x2, 4x4x4. Bottom: 8x8x8,16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 2: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&#039;). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures &#039;&#039;&#039;3 and 4.&#039;&#039;&#039; Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&#039; contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Dos1_shay.png&amp;diff=559564</id>
		<title>File:Dos1 shay.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Dos1_shay.png&amp;diff=559564"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:34:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559563</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559563"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:32:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Calculating the phonon modes of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dos_shay.png|thumb|center|upright=3|Figure 3: Density of states (Top: 2x2x2, 4x4x4, 8x8x8. Bottom: 16x16x16, 32x32x32)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 2: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&#039;). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures &#039;&#039;&#039;3 and 4.&#039;&#039;&#039; Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&#039; contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Dos_shay.png&amp;diff=559562</id>
		<title>File:Dos shay.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Dos_shay.png&amp;diff=559562"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:29:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:DOS_2x2x2.jpg&amp;diff=559561</id>
		<title>File:DOS 2x2x2.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:DOS_2x2x2.jpg&amp;diff=559561"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:21:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: Svg14 uploaded a new version of File:DOS 2x2x2.jpg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:DOS_1x1x1.jpg&amp;diff=559560</id>
		<title>File:DOS 1x1x1.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:DOS_1x1x1.jpg&amp;diff=559560"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T09:21:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: Svg14 uploaded a new version of File:DOS 1x1x1.jpg&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559559</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559559"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T08:53:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Calculating the phonon modes of MgO */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 2: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&#039;). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures &#039;&#039;&#039;3 and 4.&#039;&#039;&#039; Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&#039; contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559558</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559558"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T08:45:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 2: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&#039;). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures &#039;&#039;&#039;3 and 4.&#039;&#039;&#039; Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qh_v_md.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&#039; contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Qh_v_md.PNG&amp;diff=559557</id>
		<title>File:Qh v md.PNG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Qh_v_md.PNG&amp;diff=559557"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T08:44:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559556</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559556"/>
		<updated>2016-10-20T08:43:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: /* Molecular dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice, represented by &#039;&#039;dispersion curves&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;density of states&#039;&#039; of these modes is also calculated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 2: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&#039;). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures &#039;&#039;&#039;3 and 4.&#039;&#039;&#039; Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain temperatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&#039; contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559417</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559417"/>
		<updated>2016-10-19T18:04:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice along with the density of states of these modes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|left|upright=0.7|Figure 2: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 2). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 3 and 4. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain tempeatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&#039; contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559416</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559416"/>
		<updated>2016-10-19T17:57:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice along with the density of states of these modes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=0.7|Figure 2: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 2). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=0.8|Figure 4: Lattice constant vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 3 and 4. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain tempeatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&#039; contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG&amp;diff=559353</id>
		<title>File:Lc v temperature.PNG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Lc_v_temperature.PNG&amp;diff=559353"/>
		<updated>2016-10-19T15:27:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559351</id>
		<title>Rep:MgoSHAY123</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:MgoSHAY123&amp;diff=559351"/>
		<updated>2016-10-19T15:26:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Svg14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Free Energy and Expansion of MgO&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
===The systemː MgO crystal===&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment was conducted on a crystal of MgO, which takes the form of a face-centred cubic lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The quasi-harmonic approximation ====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this method is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method is used to compute the phonon modes of the lattice along with the density of states of these modes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Molecular dynamics====&lt;br /&gt;
The molecular dynamics method simulates the random nature of the particle motions. It contains a timestep parameter which allows the the forces on the atoms to be computed in real time and updates the velocities and positions of the particles for the next calculation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The software===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Results==&lt;br /&gt;
===Calculating the phonon modes of MgO ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Phonon_dispersion_graph.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|Figure 1: Phonon dispersion curves]]&lt;br /&gt;
Dispersion curves illustrate the bands of vibrational energy levels present within a structure. The density of states represents the number of levels at a particular k-point in reciprocal space. In a dispersion curve the levels are equally spaced along k axis, thus, the steeper the gradient, the fewer vibrational levels can be accommodated, resulting in a lower density of states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The density of states for the 1x1x1 grid can be found in Figure 2. According to the phonon dispersion curve (Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;y&#039;&#039;&#039;), this corresponds to the &#039;&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;&#039;-point &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&#039; contains six bands, including two sets of degenerate bands which account for the peaks at ~280 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;and ~350 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;being twice as high as the other two peaks, as there are twice as many states within those bands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The curve for the density of states gains more features as the grid size increases but eventually becomes a smoother curve with fewer new features appearing. As the structure gets larger, it converges to simulating an infinite lattice, with the vibrations at the edge of the lattice becoming negligible with respect to those of the bulk material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference between the density of states graph is least significant between the 16x16x16 grid and the 32x32x32 grid and what we gain in accuracy from the larger grid, we lose in speed of calculation, as the 32x32x32 calculation took more time. Hence, the 16x16x16 grid is sufficient for a reasonable approximation to the density of states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How does the density of states computed at this optimal grid size compare to that computed for smaller and larger grids ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal grid size - CaO, zeolite, lithium metal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Computing the free energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Free_energy_shay.PNG|thumb|upright=1|Figure 2: Free energy vs grid size at 300 K]]&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size of MgO was varied and the free energy was computed within the quasi-harmonic approximation (see Figure 2). Initially, as the grid is enlarged, the free energy decreases but then increases from the 4x4x4 grid upwards. The magnitude of ΔE decreases with increasing grid size, indicating that the value is converging to the free energy of an infinite lattice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The grid size used can be selected according to the desired degree of accuracy. For example, a 1x1x1 grid would be sufficient in calculations correct to 1 meV, as using a 2x2x2 increases the accuracy by &amp;lt;0.005 eV. Similarly, for accuracies of 0.5 meV and 0.1 meV, 2x2x2 and 4x4x4 grids can be used, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal expansion coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Energy_v_temperature.PNG|thumb|upright=1|Figure 3: Free energy vs temperature]]&lt;br /&gt;
Again, within the quasi-harmonic approximation, the free energy and lattice constant for temperatures between 0 and 1000 K were calculated and plotted in Figures 3 and 4. Both graphs have a linear region &amp;gt;300 K and are curved below this temperature. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coefficient of thermal expansion, α, was calculated using the gradient of the linear region in graph &#039;&#039;&#039;c &#039;&#039;&#039;as per Equation 1. It was found to be 2.65x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In literature&#039;&#039;&#039;[REF]&#039;&#039;&#039;, the coefficient of thermal expansion at 300 K was 2.88x10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-5 &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This is the same order of magnitude and similar in value to that of this experiment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the approximations in this calculation is that the motions of the particles are parabolic meaning that they lie within the equilibrium region of the Lennard-Jones potential, which can be approximated as a parabola. At certain tempeatures, the structure may not be at equilibrium so it is not appropriate to assume its motions are such. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Figure &#039;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&#039; contains the results from the MD simulations alongside that of the quasi-harmonic approximation. It can be seen that the MD points are entirely linear, as opposed to becoming curved at lower temperatures as with the quasi-harmonic approximation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The methods produce different results because MD takes into account the instantaneous motion of the particles, where the other method does not.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do the two methods produce different answers ? - how does the difference depend on temperature ? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Svg14</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>