<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Rgf18</id>
	<title>ChemWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Rgf18"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/Rgf18"/>
	<updated>2026-05-17T12:05:25Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804648</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804648"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T14:50:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polanyi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. C. Polanyi, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Acc. Chem. Res.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; 1972, &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;, 161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exothermic reaction (F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H) has an early barrier transition state, so translational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than vibrational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Table 1&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory stayed unreactive. However, when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory became reactive. This proves that translational energy is more efficient than vibrational for the exothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Table 1: Data for exothermic reaction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has a late barrier transition state, so vibrational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than translational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Table 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was increased and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was decreased the trajectory stayed reactive. This proves that vibrational energy is more efficient than translational for the endothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Table 2: Data for endothermic reaction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -18&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -10&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 21&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804646</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804646"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T14:50:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polanyi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. C. Polanyi, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Acc. Chem. Res.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1972, &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;, 161-168.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exothermic reaction (F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H) has an early barrier transition state, so translational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than vibrational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Table 1&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory stayed unreactive. However, when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory became reactive. This proves that translational energy is more efficient than vibrational for the exothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Table 1: Data for exothermic reaction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has a late barrier transition state, so vibrational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than translational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Table 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was increased and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was decreased the trajectory stayed reactive. This proves that vibrational energy is more efficient than translational for the endothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Table 2: Data for endothermic reaction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -18&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -10&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 21&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804614</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804614"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T14:39:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polangi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction. They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exothermic reaction (F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H) has an early barrier transition state, so translational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than vibrational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Table 1&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory stayed unreactive. However, when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory became reactive. This proves that translational energy is more efficient than vibrational for the exothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Table 1: Data for exothermic reaction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has a late barrier transition state, so vibrational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than translational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Table 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was increased and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was decreased the trajectory stayed reactive. This proves that vibrational energy is more efficient than translational for the endothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Table 2: Data for endothermic reaction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -18&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -10&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 21&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804588</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804588"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T14:34:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polangi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction. They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exothermic reaction (F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H) has an early barrier transition state, so translational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than vibrational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Table 1&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory stayed unreactive. However, when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory became reactive. This proves that translational energy is more efficient than vibrational for the exothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Table 1: Data for exothermic reaction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has a late barrier transition state, so vibrational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than translational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Table 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was increased and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was decreased the trajectory stayed reactive. This proves that vibrational energy is more efficient than translational for the endothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Table 2: Data for endothermic reaction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -18&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -10&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 21&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804563</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804563"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T14:29:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polangi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction. They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exothermic reaction (F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H) has an early barrier transition state, so translational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than vibrational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory data shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory stayed unreactive. However, when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory became reactive. This proves that translational energy is more efficient than vibrational for the exothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -2&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -1&lt;br /&gt;
| -3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has a late barrier transition state, so vibrational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than translational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory data shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was increased and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was decreased the trajectory stayed reactive. This proves that vibrational energy is more efficient than translational for the endothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H2 Endothermic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H Exothermic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804554</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804554"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T14:27:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polangi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction. They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exothermic reaction (F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H) has an early barrier transition state, so translational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than vibrational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory data shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory stayed unreactive. However, when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory became reactive. This proves that translational energy is more efficient than vibrational for the exothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has a late barrier transition state, so vibrational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than translational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory data shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was increased and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was decreased the trajectory stayed reactive. This proves that vibrational energy is more efficient than translational for the endothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H2 Endothermic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H Exothermic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804544</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804544"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T14:26:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polangi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction. They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exothermic reaction (F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H) has an early barrier transition state, so translational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than vibrational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory data shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory stayed unreactive. However, when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is constant at -1 and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is increased, the trajectory became reactive. This proves that translational energy is more efficient than vibrational for the exothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has a late barrier transition state, so vibrational energy, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, should be more efficient for a reactive trajectory than translational, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory data shows that when p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was increased and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was decreased the trajectory stayed reactive. This proves that vibrational energy is more efficient than translational for the endothermic reaction.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H2 Endothermic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H Exothermic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804416</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804416"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T13:40:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polangi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction. They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exothermic reaction (F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H2 Endothermic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H Exothermic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804415</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804415"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T13:39:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polangi&#039;s rules state that the position of the transition state determines what mode of energy will be more efficient for the reaction. They state that for an early barrier transition state (closer to the reactants) translational energy is more efficient, and for a late barrier transition state vibrational energy is more efficient for a reactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804355</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804355"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T13:15:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How the Distribution of Energy Between Different Modes Affect the Efficiency of the Reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804341</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804341"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T13:09:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Electrons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in intensity as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804335</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804335"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T13:05:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Photons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in energy as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804333</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804333"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T13:05:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. A. Koningstein, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Introduction to the theory of the Raman effect&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Reidel, Dordrecht, 1972.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 Photons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in energy as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804319</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804319"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:59:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally by Raman scattering. Photons that become excited transition into higher vibrational states, this leads to overtone bands being present on the IR spectra. These overtone bands will increase in energy as the higher vibrational states become more populated, allowing the increased vibrational energy of the system to be monitored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804266</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804266"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:37:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IR_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 9: A momentum-time graph for the exothermic reaction. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804264</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804264"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:36:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the product molecule, HF, to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be measured experimentally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804256</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804256"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:34:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the HF product molecule to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804255</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804255"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:34:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Where the initial conditions set the atoms A=H, B=H and C=F, which gave the A-B to represent H-H and B-C to represent H-F.  Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the HF product molecule to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804251</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804251"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:31:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the HF product molecule to have increased oscillation (seen in the increase in momentum).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804248</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804248"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:31:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the HF product molecule to oscillate more (seen in the increase in momentum).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804246</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804246"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:30:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Reaction Dynamics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 9&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; shows the momentum-time graph for a reactive trajectory for the exothermic reaction (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + F -&amp;gt; HF + H). Since energy is conserved, the extra energy released from the reaction due to its exothermic nature is converted into vibrational energy, which causes the HF product molecule to vibrate more (seen in the increase in momentum).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:IR_1_RGF.png&amp;diff=804229</id>
		<title>File:IR 1 RGF.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:IR_1_RGF.png&amp;diff=804229"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:24:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804228</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804228"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T12:24:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Activation Energy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Dynamics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804149</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804149"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:45:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State Theory */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;K. J. Laidler, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Harper &amp;amp; Row, New York, 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804135</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804135"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:40:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State Theory */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• At the transition state, you can&#039;t separate the motion of the system at the lowest point of the saddle point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804114</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804114"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:32:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804107</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804107"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:30:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Estimating the Transition State Position */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. E. Henriksen and F. Y. Hansen, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Theories of molecular reaction dynamics : the microscopic foundation of chemical kinetics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[[reflist]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804091</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804091"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:24:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[[reflist]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804090</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804090"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:24:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. S. Francisco and W. L. Hase, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;,  Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[[reflist]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804083</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804083"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:21:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last1=Francisco&lt;br /&gt;
 |first1=J.S&lt;br /&gt;
 |last2=Hase&lt;br /&gt;
 |first2=W.L&lt;br /&gt;
 |date= 1989&lt;br /&gt;
 |title=&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 |location=Upper Saddle River&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher=Prentice-Hall&lt;br /&gt;
]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
[[reflist]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804082</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804082"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:20:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last1=Francisco&lt;br /&gt;
 |first1=J.S&lt;br /&gt;
 |last2=Hase&lt;br /&gt;
 |first2=W.L&lt;br /&gt;
 |date= 1989&lt;br /&gt;
 |title=&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 |location=Upper Saddle River&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher=Prentice-Hall&lt;br /&gt;
]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804078</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804078"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:20:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Activation Energy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last1=Francisco&lt;br /&gt;
 |first1=J.S&lt;br /&gt;
 |last2=Hase&lt;br /&gt;
 |first2=W.L&lt;br /&gt;
 |date= 1989&lt;br /&gt;
 |title=&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 |location=Upper Saddle River&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher=Prentice-Hall&lt;br /&gt;
}} The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804054</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=804054"/>
		<updated>2020-05-15T11:11:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path.{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 |last1=Francisco&lt;br /&gt;
 |first1=J.S&lt;br /&gt;
 |last2=Hase&lt;br /&gt;
 |first2=W.L&lt;br /&gt;
 |date= 1989&lt;br /&gt;
 |title=&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Chemical kinetics and dynamics&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 |location=Upper Saddle River&lt;br /&gt;
 |publisher=Prentice-Hall&lt;br /&gt;
}} The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803449</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803449"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T18:43:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Activation Energy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy of the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803446</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803446"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T18:43:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Activation Energy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy at the transition state minus the potential energy of the products, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The MEP calculation was used to find the potential energy of the reactants, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -558.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From the calculation for the transition state, the transition state potential energy was extracted, V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;TS&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. From this the activation energy was calculated, E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 124.7 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803128</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803128"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T15:09:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Activation Energy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the potential energy at the transition state minus the potential energy of the products.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803125</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803125"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T15:08:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the energy at the transition state&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803123</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803123"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T15:07:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the potential energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Activation Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activation energy is the energy at the transition state&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803106</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803106"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:54:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Estimating the Transition State Position */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803104</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803104"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:54:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the transition state energy to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the energy at the transition state to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803103</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803103"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:53:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Estimating the Transition State Position */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm. Giving the transition state energy to be -415.4 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the transition state energy to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803102</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803102"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:52:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm. Giving the transition state energy to be -434.0 kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803096</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803096"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:48:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance-time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_2_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 8: Internuclear distance-time graph showing the transition state. ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FH2_2_RGF.png&amp;diff=803094</id>
		<title>File:FH2 2 RGF.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:FH2_2_RGF.png&amp;diff=803094"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:47:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803091</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803091"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:46:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74.5 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance vs time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74.5 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 182 pm.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803086</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803086"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:44:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. Therefore, the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance vs time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 181 pm.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803080</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803080"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:42:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74 pm, and different distances between F and H (the AB distance) were tested until the internuclear distance vs time graph had a gradient of zero. The transition state point can be seen on &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; as the black dot at r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HH&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;HF&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 181 pm.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803072</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803072"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:39:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value to predict the transition state. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74 pm, and different distances for the AB distance were tested until the internuclear distance vs time graph had a gradient of zero.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803070</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803070"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:38:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74 pm, and different distances for the AB distance were tested until the internuclear distance vs time graph had a gradient of zero.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803067</id>
		<title>MRD:RGF</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:RGF&amp;diff=803067"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T14:37:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rgf18: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Molecular Reaction Dynamics for Triatomic Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; systems==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface Plots and Transition States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A potential energy surface maps the progress of a reaction as a function of r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The trajectory of the reaction is the relative positions of the atoms at each instant in time, and shows how these relative positions lead to a change in potential energy of the system. The trajectory is displayed as a black line on the plots. The transition state is displayed as a saddle point on a potential energy surface, and is defined as the maximum on the minimum energy path. The reactants and products form minima on the minimum energy path due to there being no unfavorable interactions between H and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, however when the atom approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; they begin to repel each other, increasing the potential energy. The maximum repulsion is reached at the transition state. The transition state is mathematically defined as:∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=0. It can be distinguished from a local minimum of the potential energy surface as ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 0, since it is a minimum point, and ∂V&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt; 0, since it is a maximum point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_surface3_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 1: A surface plot showing the transition state as the maximum of the minimum energy path.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Estimating the Transition State Position===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_IDvT1_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 2: An internuclear distance against time graph for H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the potential energy surface for the H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; system is symmetric, the transition state is when the distances between AB and BC are equal. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 2&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; allows this distance to be estimated at 85 - 95 pm. The initial conditions were set to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 0.0 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Different distance values were tested until the internuclear distance against time graph had a gradient of zero, and the animation showed the system undergoing a periodic symmetric vibration. This gave the estimate of the transition state position, r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, to be equal to 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TS_INvT2_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 3: An internuclear distance against time graph showing the transition state position to be equal to 90.8 pm.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reaction Path===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) calculates the reaction path by using a trajectory that has the particles moving infinitely slowly. It does this by resetting the momenta to zero in each time step, this causes the MEP calculation to follow the valley floor throughout the whole reaction. In the dynamic calculations, the particles have a momentum that causes an oscillating nature, where the energy is continually switching from potential to kinetic energy. This can be seen in the wavy nature of the trajectory as it continually goes through peaks and troughs of potential energy. The dynamic calculation is more realistic as atoms have a mass and their motion will be inertial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set to slightly displace the transition state towards the products and with an initial momenta of zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MEP_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 4: MEP calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dynamic_RGF.png|thumb|500px|center|Figure 5: Dynamic calculation for trajectory.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reactive and Unreactive Trajectories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setting the initial conditions to r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;AB&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;BC&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;= 200 pm, different values for momenta were tested to see if higher kinetic energy guaranteed a reactive trajectory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; / kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.3&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which doesn&#039;t oscillate due to the relatively low momentum for p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) and has sufficient energy in the correct modes to overcome the activation energy, forming H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The two products move away from each other and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates due to p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; having sufficient momentum.  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:-2.56_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -4.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -420.1&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (which oscillates), but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; has insufficient energy in the correct modes, causing an unreactive trajectory.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:3.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -414.0&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| This reaction follows a similar trajectory to the first reaction. However, due to the increased momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; oscillates while it approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:3.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -357.3&lt;br /&gt;
| No&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. Resulting in no reaction being observed.&lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1&lt;br /&gt;
| -10.6&lt;br /&gt;
| -349.5&lt;br /&gt;
| Yes&lt;br /&gt;
| H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and has sufficient energy to overcome the activation energy, and cross the transition state. Due to the high momentum of p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is oscillating with high kinetic energy, so as the two particles begin to translate away from each other, a second transition state is crossed and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reforms. A third transition state is crossed due to the high energy oscillations, meaning H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; forms as the product. So this reaction passes the transition state three times, resulting in a reactive trajectory.   &lt;br /&gt;
| [[File:5.1(2)_RGF.png|450px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State Theory===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transition state theory (TST) rationalises a reaction as the minimum energy path from the reactants to the products, passing through an energy maxima, which represents the transition state. TST makes many assumptions which affects its reaction rate when compared to experimental rates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST considers the system classically, it is described by a trajectory with a velocity and not a wavefunction. In our model for our potential energy surface, our trajectory is described by a momentum (velocity x mass), so is treated classically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Since the system is classical, quantum tunneling is ignored. This will lead to TST giving an underestimation of the rate, as a classical view won&#039;t allow molecules with insufficient energy to overcome the activation energy by tunneling through the potential barrier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• The kinetic energy along the reaction coordinate follows the Boltzmann distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• TST states that all trajectories with a kinetic energy larger than the activation energy will be reactive, and that every time the transition state is crossed products are formed. This assumption is proved wrong by &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 5&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, as it shows that reactants can cross the transition state forming products, and then these products can pass back through the transition state reforming the reactants. This will lead to an overestimation in the TST reaction rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:5.1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 6: Contour plot showing that not all transition state crossings result in a reactive trajectory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quantum tunneling contributes a relatively low amount to the rate of reaction when compared to the fact that not all transition state crossings form products. Therefore, TST leads to an overestimation of the rate when compared to experimental rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F - H - H system==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Potential Energy Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial conditions were set up so atoms A=F, B=H and C=H. This produced a potential energy surface for which at a large BC distance HF + H would form, and at large AB distance F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; would form. From &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Figure 7&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, you can see that the potential energy at large AB distance is more positive than at large BC distance. Therefore, HF + H is at a lower energy than F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Endothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H     &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Exothermic&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FH2_1_RGF.png|500px|center|thumb|Figure 7: Surface plot of F - H - H system]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Transition State===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This energy surface isn&#039;t symmetrical, so the two r values can&#039;t just be set to the same value. The transition state must be estimated through its definition, the maxima on the minimum energy curve, via the identification of a saddle point. The Hammond postulate states that for an endothermic reaction (HF + H -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) the transition state will resemble the products, due to it being a late transition state. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; distance was set to the bond distance of 74 pm, and the&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rgf18</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>