<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ml9418</id>
	<title>ChemWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ml9418"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ml9418"/>
	<updated>2026-04-07T23:04:17Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811386</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811386"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T20:31:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path stops is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103315.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against processed steps. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is stretched on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down (unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface, such as the reactants and the products). This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when an MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory heads straight towards the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products along the trough of the valley, whereas when a dynamics simulation is run from the same starting position with 0 momentum, the trajectory clearly shows some vibration between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This shows that as potential energy is lost, kinetic energy is gained in the form of vibrational energy, in order to conserve total energy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; If the simulations were run under the conditions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory would lead to the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products instead of the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If the initial and final conditions of the simulations are reversed (initial position on the plot replaced by the final position from the previous simulation, and initial momenta replaced by the final momenta), one ends up with a trajectory that starts from where the previous simulation ended, and ends ar where the previous simulation started. In this case, the trajectory ends exactly at the transition state, and where it starts depends on how many steps the previous simulation was run for. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left) on contour plots, where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testing Different Reaction Trajectories for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running a reactive simulation for this reaction gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products, since they would have enough kinetic energy to pass the activation energy barrier. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Transition State Theory === &lt;br /&gt;
Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. It is even possible for the trajectory to cross the activation energy more times, but in half of these cases, products will not be formed in the end. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, which can occur in very light particles. The hydrogen atom, however, is not light enough for this tunnelling to occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate that is caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. The fraction of trajectories that are reactive due to tunnelling is orders of magnitude lower than the fraction of trajectories that are unreactive due to bad momenta combinations. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another assumption of TST is that a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium is maintained in both the reactants and products. However, in bimolecular gas reactions, such as this one, this does not hold true, since selective energy consumption and release takes place&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Energetics of the Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction for this transformation is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State of the Transformation ===&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and closest hydrogen is 181.1 pm). This value is approximate, since it was found by guessing values until the MEP simulation stayed in approximately the same location for 100 steps of 0.1 fs.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Activation Energies of the Forward and Backward Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The activation energy for the forward reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backward reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol. These energies were determined by running an MEP simulation from the transition state to the reactants and the products for 8000 steps of 0.2 fs, then estimating where the minimum potential energy plateau would be on an energy against time plot, then subtracting that plateau&#039;s value from the transition state&#039;s potential energy value. A more accurate value for the plateaus could have been determined by running the simulation for at least twice as many steps, but processing that many steps would take a long time. Using this method gives the activation energy for the reactants approaching from infinitely far away. In a solution or container of finite volume, the activation energy would be slightly lower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against processed steps for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from an MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Release of Reaction Energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy. In the forward reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, which gives information about the energy states of the products of a reaction&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If infrared radiation is detected from the reaction, it means that potential energy does get converted to vibrational motion. This works because vibrational relaxation, if it is radiative, emits infrared radiation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Effect of Translational and Vibrational Energy on the Reaction ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running dynamics simulations for the forward and backward reactions using various values for the momenta p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reveals some information about whether vibrational or translational motion is needed for each reaction to occur. For the forward reaction, most trajectories that led to products started with the reactants having low vibrational energy. Conversely, for the backward reaction, large vibrational energy was needed to convert reactants to products. For the forward reaction, there was more leeway for choosing the values of momentum than for the backward reaction. Finding a reaction path for the backward reaction proved difficult, as the vibrational motion needed to be just right for the activation energy barrier to be crossed.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; For the forward reaction, very small values for initial momenta can be used, since the activation energy barrier is very small, whereas the backward reaction needs large momenta to occur. This indicates that the required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the products have higher potential energy than the reactants and the activation energy is large. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants, but is rather behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and also low translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
1)Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetic and Dynamics 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1998. pp. 316-318&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2)A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press, 2008.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811367</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811367"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T20:22:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path stops is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103315.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against processed steps. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is stretched on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down (unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface, such as the reactants and the products). This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when an MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory heads straight towards the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products along the trough of the valley, whereas when a dynamics simulation is run from the same starting position with 0 momentum, the trajectory clearly shows some vibration between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This shows that as potential energy is lost, kinetic energy is gained in the form of vibrational energy, in order to conserve total energy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; If the simulations were run under the conditions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory would lead to the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products instead of the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If the initial and final conditions of the simulations are reversed (initial position on the plot replaced by the final position from the previous simulation, and initial momenta replaced by the final momenta), one ends up with a trajectory that starts from where the previous simulation ended, and ends ar where the previous simulation started. In this case, the trajectory ends exactly at the transition state, and where it starts depends on how many steps the previous simulation was run for. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left) on contour plots, where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testing Different Reaction Trajectories for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running a reactive simulation for this reaction gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products, since they would have enough kinetic energy to pass the activation energy barrier. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Transition State Theory === &lt;br /&gt;
Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. It is even possible for the trajectory to cross the activation energy more times, but in half of these cases, products will not be formed in the end. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, which can occur in very light particles. The hydrogen atom, however, is not light enough for this tunnelling to occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate that is caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. The fraction of trajectories that are reactive due to tunnelling is orders of magnitude lower than the fraction of trajectories that are unreactive due to bad momenta combinations. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another assumption of TST is that a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium is maintained in both the reactants and products. However, in bimolecular gas reactions, such as this one, this does not hold true, since selective energy consumption and release takes place&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Energetics of the Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction for this transformation is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State of the Transformation ===&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and closest hydrogen is 181.1 pm). This value is approximate, since it was found by guessing values until the MEP simulation stayed in approximately the same location for 100 steps of 0.1 fs.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Activation Energies of the Forward and Backward Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The activation energy for the forward reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backward reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol. These energies were determined by running an MEP simulation from the transition state to the reactants and the products for 8000 steps of 0.2 fs, then estimating where the minimum potential energy plateau would be on an energy against time plot, then subtracting that plateau&#039;s value from the transition state&#039;s potential energy value. A more accurate value for the plateaus could have been determined by running the simulation for at least twice as many steps, but processing that many steps would take a long time. Using this method gives the activation energy for the reactants approaching from infinitely far away. In a solution or container of finite volume, the activation energy would be slightly lower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against processed steps for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from an MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Release of Reaction Energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy. In the forward reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, which gives information about the energy states of the products of a reaction&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If infrared radiation is detected from the reaction, it means that potential energy does get converted to vibrational motion. This works because vibrational relaxation, if it is radiative, emits infrared radiation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Running dynamics simulations for the forward and backward reactions using various values for the momenta p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reveals some information about whether vibrational or translational motion is needed for each reaction to occur. For the forward reaction, most trajectories that led to products started with the reactants having low vibrational energy. Conversely, for the backward reaction, large vibrational energy was needed to convert reactants to products. For the forward reaction, there was more leeway for choosing the values of momentum than for the backward reaction. Finding a reaction path for the backward reaction proved difficult, as the vibrational motion needed to be just right for the activation energy barrier to be crossed. For the forward reaction, very small values for initial momenta can be used, since the activation energy barrier is very small, whereas the backward reaction needs large momenta to occur. This indicates that the required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the products have higher potential energy than the reactants and the activation energy is large. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants, but is rather behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and also low translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
1)Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetic and Dynamics 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1998. pp. 316-318&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2)A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press, 2008.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811341</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811341"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T20:17:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path stops is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103315.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against processed steps. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is stretched on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down (unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface, such as the reactants and the products). This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when an MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory heads straight towards the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products along the trough of the valley, whereas when a dynamics simulation is run from the same starting position with 0 momentum, the trajectory clearly shows some vibration between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This shows that as potential energy is lost, kinetic energy is gained in the form of vibrational energy, in order to conserve total energy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; If the simulations were run under the conditions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory would lead to the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products instead of the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If the initial and final conditions of the simulations are reversed (initial position on the plot replaced by the final position from the previous simulation, and initial momenta replaced by the final momenta), one ends up with a trajectory that starts from where the previous simulation ended, and ends ar where the previous simulation started. In this case, the trajectory ends exactly at the transition state, and where it starts depends on how many steps the previous simulation was run for. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left) on contour plots, where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testing Different Reaction Trajectories for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running a reactive simulation for this reaction gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products, since they would have enough kinetic energy to pass the activation energy barrier. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Transition State Theory === &lt;br /&gt;
Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. It is even possible for the trajectory to cross the activation energy more times, but in half of these cases, products will not be formed in the end. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, which can occur in very light particles. The hydrogen atom, however, is not light enough for this tunnelling to occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate that is caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. The fraction of trajectories that are reactive due to tunnelling is orders of magnitude lower than the fraction of trajectories that are unreactive due to bad momenta combinations. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another assumption of TST is that a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium is maintained in both the reactants and products. However, in bimolecular gas reactions, such as this one, this does not hold true, since selective energy consumption and release takes place&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Energetics of the Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction for this transformation is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State of the Transformation ===&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and closest hydrogen is 181.1 pm). This value is approximate, since it was found by guessing values until the MEP simulation stayed in approximately the same location for 100 steps of 0.1 fs.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Activation Energies of the Forward and Backward Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The activation energy for the forward reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backward reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol. These energies were determined by running an MEP simulation from the transition state to the reactants and the products for 8000 steps of 0.2 fs, then estimating where the minimum potential energy plateau would be on an energy against time plot, then subtracting that plateau&#039;s value from the transition state&#039;s potential energy value. A more accurate value for the plateaus could have been determined by running the simulation for at least twice as many steps, but processing that many steps would take a long time. Using this method gives the activation energy for the reactants approaching from infinitely far away. In a solution or container of finite volume, the activation energy would be slightly lower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against processed steps for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from an MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Release of Reaction Energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy. In the forward reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, which gives information about the energy states of the products of a reaction&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If infrared radiation is detected from the reaction, it means that potential energy does get converted to vibrational motion. This works because vibrational relaxation, if it is radiative, emits infrared radiation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Running dynamics simulations for the forward and backward reactions using various values for the momenta p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reveals some information about whether vibrational or translational motion is needed for each reaction to occur. For the forward reaction, most trajectories that led to products started with the reactants having low vibrational energy. Conversely, for the backward reaction, large vibrational energy was needed to convert reactants to products. For the forward reaction, there was more leeway for choosing the values of momentum than for the backward reaction. Finding a reaction path for the backward reaction proved difficult, as the vibrational motion needed to be just right for the activation energy barrier to be crossed. For the forward reaction, very small values for initial momenta can be used, since the activation energy barrier is very small, whereas the backward reaction needs large momenta to occur. This indicates that the required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the products have higher potential energy than the reactants and the activation energy is large. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants, but is rather behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and also low translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
1)Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetic and Dynamics 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1998. pp. 316-318&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2)A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press, 2008.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811339</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811339"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T20:16:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path stops is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103315.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against processed steps. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is stretched on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down (unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface, such as the reactants and the products). This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when an MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory heads straight towards the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products along the trough of the valley, whereas when a dynamics simulation is run from the same starting position with 0 momentum, the trajectory clearly shows some vibration between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This shows that as potential energy is lost, kinetic energy is gained in the form of vibrational energy, in order to conserve total energy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; If the simulations were run under the conditions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory would lead to the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products instead of the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If the initial and final conditions of the simulations are reversed (initial position on the plot replaced by the final position from the previous simulation, and initial momenta replaced by the final momenta), one ends up with a trajectory that starts from where the previous simulation ended, and ends ar where the previous simulation started. In this case, the trajectory ends exactly at the transition state, and where it starts depends on how many steps the previous simulation was run for. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left) on contour plots, where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testing Different Reaction Trajectories for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running a reactive simulation for this reaction gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products, since they would have enough kinetic energy to pass the activation energy barrier. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Transition State Theory === &lt;br /&gt;
Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. It is even possible for the trajectory to cross the activation energy more times, but in half of these cases, products will not be formed in the end. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, which can occur in very light particles. The hydrogen atom, however, is not light enough for this tunnelling to occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate that is caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. The fraction of trajectories that are reactive due to tunnelling is orders of magnitude lower than the fraction of trajectories that are unreactive due to bad momenta combinations. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another assumption of TST is that a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium is maintained in both the reactants and products. However, in bimolecular gas reactions, such as this one, this does not hold true, since selective energy consumption and release takes place&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Energetics of the Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction for this transformation is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State of the Transformation ===&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and closest hydrogen is 181.1 pm). This value is approximate, since it was found by guessing values until the MEP simulation stayed in approximately the same location for 100 steps of 0.1 fs.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Activation Energies of the Forward and Backward Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The activation energy for the forward reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backward reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol. These energies were determined by running an MEP simulation from the transition state to the reactants and the products for 8000 steps of 0.2 fs, then estimating where the minimum potential energy plateau would be on an energy against time plot, then subtracting that plateau&#039;s value from the transition state&#039;s potential energy value. A more accurate value for the plateaus could have been determined by running the simulation for at least twice as many steps, but processing that many steps would take a long time. Using this method gives the activation energy for the reactants approaching from infinitely far away. In a solution or container of finite volume, the activation energy would be slightly lower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against processed steps for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from an MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Release of Reaction Energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy. In the forward reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, which gives information about the energy states of the products of a reaction&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If infrared radiation is detected from the reaction, it means that potential energy does get converted to vibrational motion. This works because vibrational relaxation, if it is radiative, emits infrared radiation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Running dynamics simulations for the forward and backward reactions using various values for the momenta p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reveals some information about whether vibrational or translational motion is needed for each reaction to occur. For the forward reaction, most trajectories that led to products started with the reactants having low vibrational energy. Conversely, for the backward reaction, large vibrational energy was needed to convert reactants to products. For the forward reaction, there was more leeway for choosing the values of momentum than for the backward reaction. Finding a reaction path for the backward reaction proved difficult, as the vibrational motion needed to be just right for the activation energy barrier to be crossed. For the forward reaction, very small values for initial momenta can be used, since the activation energy barrier is very small, whereas the backward reaction needs large momenta to occur. This indicates that the required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the products have higher potential energy than the reactants and the activation energy is large. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants, but is rather behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and also low translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
1)Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetic and Dynamics 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1998. pp. 316-318&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2)A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press, 2008.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811331</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811331"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T20:11:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path stops is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103315.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against processed steps. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is stretched on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down (unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface, such as the reactants and the products). This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when an MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory heads straight towards the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products along the trough of the valley, whereas when a dynamics simulation is run from the same starting position with 0 momentum, the trajectory clearly shows some vibration between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This shows that as potential energy is lost, kinetic energy is gained in the form of vibrational energy, in order to conserve total energy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; If the simulations were run under the conditions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory would lead to the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products instead of the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If the initial and final conditions of the simulations are reversed (initial position on the plot replaced by the final position from the previous simulation, and initial momenta replaced by the final momenta), one ends up with a trajectory that starts from where the previous simulation ended, and ends ar where the previous simulation started. In this case, the trajectory ends exactly at the transition state, and where it starts depends on how many steps the previous simulation was run for. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left) on contour plots, where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testing Different Reaction Trajectories for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running a reactive simulation for this reaction over a long enough timespan gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products, since they would have enough kinetic energy to pass the activation energy barrier. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Transition State Theory === &lt;br /&gt;
Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. It is even possible for the trajectory to cross the activation energy more times, but in half of these cases, products will not be formed in the end. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, which can occur in very light particles. The hydrogen atom, however, is not light enough for this tunnelling to occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate that is caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. The fraction of trajectories that are reactive due to tunnelling is orders of magnitude lower than the fraction of trajectories that are unreactive due to bad momenta combinations. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another assumption of TST is that a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium is maintained in both the reactants and products. However, in bimolecular gas reactions, such as this one, this does not hold true, since selective energy consumption and release takes place&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Energetics of the Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction for this transformation is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State of the Transformation ===&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and closest hydrogen is 181.1 pm). This value is approximate, since it was found by guessing values until the MEP simulation stayed in approximately the same location for 100 steps of 0.1 fs.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Activation Energies of the Forward and Backward Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The activation energy for the forward reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backward reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol. These energies were determined by running an MEP simulation from the transition state to the reactants and the products for 8000 steps of 0.2 fs, then estimating where the minimum potential energy plateau would be on an energy against time plot, then subtracting that plateau&#039;s value from the transition state&#039;s potential energy value. A more accurate value for the plateaus could have been determined by running the simulation for at least twice as many steps, but processing that many steps would take a long time. Using this method gives the activation energy for the reactants approaching from infinitely far away. In a solution or container of finite volume, the activation energy would be slightly lower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against processed steps for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from an MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Release of Reaction Energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy. In the forward reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, which gives information about the energy states of the products of a reaction&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If infrared radiation is detected from the reaction, it means that potential energy does get converted to vibrational motion. This works because vibrational relaxation, if it is radiative, emits infrared radiation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Running dynamics simulations for the forward and backward reactions using various values for the momenta p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reveals some information about whether vibrational or translational motion is needed for each reaction to occur. For the forward reaction, most trajectories that led to products started with the reactants having low vibrational energy. Conversely, for the backward reaction, large vibrational energy was needed to convert reactants to products. For the forward reaction, there was more leeway for choosing the values of momentum than for the backward reaction. Finding a reaction path for the backward reaction proved difficult, as the vibrational motion needed to be just right for the activation energy barrier to be crossed. For the forward reaction, very small values for initial momenta can be used, since the activation energy barrier is very small, whereas the backward reaction needs large momenta to occur. This indicates that the required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the products have higher potential energy than the reactants and the activation energy is large. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants, but is rather behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and also low translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
1)Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetic and Dynamics 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1998. pp. 316-318&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2)A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press, 2008.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811316</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811316"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T20:08:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path stops is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103315.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against time. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is stretched on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down (unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface, such as the reactants and the products). This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when an MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory heads straight towards the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products along the trough of the valley, whereas when a dynamics simulation is run from the same starting position with 0 momentum, the trajectory clearly shows some vibration between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This shows that as potential energy is lost, kinetic energy is gained in the form of vibrational energy, in order to conserve total energy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; If the simulations were run under the conditions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory would lead to the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products instead of the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If the initial and final conditions of the simulations are reversed (initial position on the plot replaced by the final position from the previous simulation, and initial momenta replaced by the final momenta), one ends up with a trajectory that starts from where the previous simulation ended, and ends ar where the previous simulation started. In this case, the trajectory ends exactly at the transition state, and where it starts depends on how many steps the previous simulation was run for. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left), where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testing Different Reaction Trajectories for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running a reactive simulation for this reaction over a long enough timespan gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products, since they would have enough kinetic energy to pass the activation energy barrier. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Transition State Theory === &lt;br /&gt;
Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. It is even possible for the trajectory to cross the activation energy more times, but in half of these cases, products will not be formed in the end. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, which can occur in very light particles. The hydrogen atom, however, is not light enough for this tunnelling to occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate that is caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. The fraction of trajectories that are reactive due to tunnelling is orders of magnitude lower than the fraction of trajectories that are unreactive due to bad momenta combinations. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another assumption of TST is that a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium is maintained in both the reactants and products. However, in bimolecular gas reactions, such as this one, this does not hold true, since selective energy consumption and release takes place&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Energetics of the Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction for this transformation is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State of the Transformation ===&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and closest hydrogen is 181.1 pm). This value is approximate, since it was found by guessing values until the MEP simulation stayed in approximately the same location for 100 steps of 0.1 fs.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Activation Energies of the Forward and Backward Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The activation energy for the forward reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backward reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol. These energies were determined by running an MEP simulation from the transition state to the reactants and the products for 8000 steps of 0.2 fs, then estimating where the minimum potential energy plateau would be on an energy against time plot, then subtracting that plateau&#039;s value from the transition state&#039;s potential energy value. A more accurate value for the plateaus could have been determined by running the simulation for at least twice as many steps, but processing that many steps would take a long time. Using this method gives the activation energy for the reactants approaching from infinitely far away. In a solution or container of finite volume, the activation energy would be slightly lower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against time for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from an MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Release of Reaction Energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy. In the forward reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, which gives information about the energy states of the products of a reaction&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If infrared radiation is detected from the reaction, it means that potential energy does get converted to vibrational motion. This works because vibrational relaxation, if it is radiative, emits infrared radiation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Running dynamics simulations for the forward and backward reactions using various values for the momenta p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reveals some information about whether vibrational or translational motion is needed for each reaction to occur. For the forward reaction, most trajectories that led to products started with the reactants having low vibrational energy. Conversely, for the backward reaction, large vibrational energy was needed to convert reactants to products. For the forward reaction, there was more leeway for choosing the values of momentum than for the backward reaction. Finding a reaction path for the backward reaction proved difficult, as the vibrational motion needed to be just right for the activation energy barrier to be crossed. For the forward reaction, very small values for initial momenta can be used, since the activation energy barrier is very small, whereas the backward reaction needs large momenta to occur. This indicates that the required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the products have higher potential energy than the reactants and the activation energy is large. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants, but is rather behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and also low translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
1)Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetic and Dynamics 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1998. pp. 316-318&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2)A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press, 2008.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811278</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811278"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T19:58:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path stops is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103315.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against time. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is stretched on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down (unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface, such as the reactants and the products). This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when an MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory heads straight towards the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products along the trough of the valley, whereas when a dynamics simulation is run from the same starting position with 0 momentum, the trajectory clearly shows some vibration between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This shows that as potential energy is lost, kinetic energy is gained in the form of vibrational energy, in order to conserve total energy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; If the simulations were run under the conditions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory would lead to the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products instead of the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If the initial and final conditions of the simulations are reversed (initial position on the plot replaced by the final position from the previous simulation, and initial momenta replaced by the final momenta), one ends up with a trajectory that starts from where the previous simulation ended, and ends ar where the previous simulation started. In this case, the trajectory ends exactly at the transition state, and where it starts depends on how many steps the previous simulation was run for. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left), where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testing Different Reaction Trajectories for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running a reactive simulation for this reaction over a long enough timespan gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products, since they would have enough kinetic energy to pass the activation energy barrier. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Transition State Theory === &lt;br /&gt;
Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. It is even possible for the trajectory to cross the activation energy more times, but in half of these cases, products will not be formed in the end. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, which can occur in very light particles. The hydrogen atom, however, is not light enough for this tunnelling to occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate that is caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. The fraction of trajectories that are reactive due to tunnelling is orders of magnitude lower than the fraction of trajectories that are unreactive due to bad momenta combinations. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another assumption of TST is that a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium is maintained in both the reactants and products. However, in bimolecular gas reactions, such as this one, this does not hold true, since selective energy consumption and release takes place&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Energetics of the Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction for this transformation is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State of the Transformation ===&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and closest hydrogen is 181.1 pm). This value is approximate, since it was found by guessing values until the MEP simulation stayed in approximately the same location for 100 steps of 0.1 fs.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Activation Energies of the Forward and Backward Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The activation energy for the forward reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backward reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol. These energies were determined by running an MEP simulation from the transition state to the reactants and the products for 8000 steps of 0.2 fs, then estimating where the minimum potential energy plateau would be on an energy against time plot, then subtracting that plateau&#039;s value from the transition state&#039;s potential energy value. A more accurate value for the plateaus could have been determined by running the simulation for at least twice as many steps, but processing that many steps would take a long time. Using this method gives the activation energy for the reactants approaching from infinitely far away. In a solution or container of finite volume, the activation energy would be slightly lower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against time for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from an MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Release of Reaction Energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy. In the forward reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, which gives information about the energy states of the products of a reaction&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If infrared radiation is detected from the reaction, it means that potential energy does get converted to vibrational motion. This works because vibrational relaxation, if it is radiative, emits infrared radiation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Running dynamics simulations for the forward and backward reactions using various values for the momenta p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reveals some information about whether vibrational or translational motion is needed for each reaction to occur. For the forward reaction, most trajectories that led to products started with the reactants having low vibrational energy and high vibrational energy. Conversely, for the backward reaction, large vibrational energy and low translational energy was needed to convert reactants to products. For the forward reaction, there was more leeway for choosing the values of momentum than for the backward reaction. Finding a reaction path for the backward reaction proved difficult, as the vibrational motion needed to be just right for the activation energy barrier to be crossed. This indicates that the required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the products have higher potential energy than the reactants and the activation energy is large. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants, but is rather behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and also low translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
1)Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetic and Dynamics 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1998. pp. 316-318&lt;br /&gt;
2)A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press, 2008.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811253</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=811253"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T19:51:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path stops is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and products.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103315.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against time. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is stretched on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down (unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface, such as the reactants and the products). This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when an MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory heads straight towards the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products along the trough of the valley, whereas when a dynamics simulation is run from the same starting position with 0 momentum, the trajectory clearly shows some vibration between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. This shows that as potential energy is lost, kinetic energy is gained in the form of vibrational energy, in order to conserve total energy.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; If the simulations were run under the conditions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1 = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 1, the trajectory would lead to the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products instead of the H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left), where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testing Different Reaction Trajectories for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Running a reactive simulation for this reaction over a long enough timespan gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products, since they would have enough kinetic energy to pass the activation energy barrier. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Transition State Theory === &lt;br /&gt;
Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. It is even possible for the trajectory to cross the activation energy more times, but in half of these cases, products will not be formed in the end. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, which can occur in very light particles. The hydrogen atom, however, is not light enough for this tunnelling to occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate that is caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. The fraction of trajectories that are reactive due to tunnelling is orders of magnitude lower than the fraction of trajectories that are unreactive due to bad momenta combinations. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another assumption of TST is that a Maxwell-Boltzmann equilibrium is maintained in both the reactants and products. However, in bimolecular gas reactions, such as this one, this does not hold true, since selective energy consumption and release takes place&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Energetics of the Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction for this transformation is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Transition State of the Transformation ===&lt;br /&gt;
The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and closest hydrogen is 181.1 pm). This value is approximate, since it was found by guessing values until the MEP simulation stayed in approximately the same location for 100 steps of 0.1 fs.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Activation Energies of the Forward and Backward Reactions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The activation energy for the forward reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backward reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol. These energies were determined by running an MEP simulation from the transition state to the reactants and the products for 8000 steps of 0.2 fs, then estimating where the minimum potential energy plateau would be on an energy against time plot, then subtracting that plateau&#039;s value from the transition state&#039;s potential energy value. A more accurate value for the plateaus could have been determined by running the simulation for at least twice as many steps, but processing that many steps would take a long time. Using this method gives the activation energy for the reactants approaching from infinitely far away. In a solution or container of finite volume, the activation energy would be slightly lower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against time for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from an MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Release of Reaction Energy ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, and electronic energy. In the forward reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, which gives information about the energy states of the products of a reaction&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If infrared radiation is detected from the reaction, it means that potential energy does get converted to vibrational motion. This works because vibrational relaxation, if it is radiative, emits infrared radiation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Running dynamics simulations for the forward and backward reactions using various values for the momenta p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; reveals some information about whether vibrational or translational motion is needed for each reaction to occur. For the forward reaction, most trajectories that led to products started with the reactants having low vibrational energy and high vibrational energy. Conversely, for the backward reaction, large vibrational energy and low translational energy was needed to convert reactants to products. For the forward reaction, there was more leeway for choosing the values of momentum than for the backward reaction. Finding a reaction path for the backward reaction proved difficult, as the vibrational motion needed to be just right for the activation energy barrier to be crossed. This indicates that the required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the products have higher potential energy than the reactants and the activation energy is large. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants, but is rather behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and also low translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
1)Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. S.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetic and Dynamics 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1998. pp. 316-318&lt;br /&gt;
2)A Dictionary of Chemistry, 6th ed.; Oxford University Press, 2008.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103315.png&amp;diff=810669</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103315.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103315.png&amp;diff=810669"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T17:17:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: the previous file was not displaying correctly on my page so i am trying to upload it as a separate file&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;the previous file was not displaying correctly on my page so i am trying to upload it as a separate file&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=810658</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=810658"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T17:14:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== the Transition State and its Identification ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point with the highest energy on the minimum energy path that connects the reactants and the products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r1=r2. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path ends is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r1=r2 line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature (the second derivatives) around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Position of the Tranition State for the Reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H -&amp;gt; H + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.774 pm. This point was found using the method mentioned before - a minimum energy path simulation was run, starting from a point on the diagonal r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. The point where the minimum energy path simulation stops is the transition state, because it is the minimum energy point along the r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; line. It can not move any lower (towards the reactants or the products) because at that point the gradient is zero in all directions, including the minimum energy path.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103302.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens for the aforementioned reaction plotted against time. This plot was constructed by simulating a minimum energy path from a starting point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 60 pm]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Minimum Energy Path (MEP) ===&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum energy path, or reaction path is a theoretical reaction trajectory that corresponds to infinitely slow motion of reactants and products. On an MEP, the momenta and velocities are always zero, because the movement of reactants and products is on an infinitely long timescale. The MEP is different from the actual reaction trajectory because on the MEP, the system has no kinetic energy and the potential energy always goes down, unless the MEP is specifically connecting two points on the surface. This means that the system is always losing total energy to head directly to the point of lowest potential energy. In reality, total energy must always be conserved, so when the trajectory heads downward on the potential energy surface (losing potential energy), it must gain kinetic energy. This can be in the form of translational, rotational, vibrational, or electronic energy. For the given reaction, when a MEP is simulated from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left), where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Testing different reaction trajectories for the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Running a simulation for this reaction over a long enough timespan gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Transition State Theory&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, and quantum tunneling can only have an impact because a hydrogen atom is the lightest atom that can exist. This tunnelling, however, does not occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2 -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and bond-forming hydrogen is 181.1 pm).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;The activation energy for the forwards reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backwards reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against time for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from a MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be seen in the form of translational, rotational, or vibrational motion. In this reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, and it works because radiative vibrational relaxation emits infrared radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction. For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the activation energy is large and a very large amount of translational energy is needed to overcome the barrier. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants on the MEP. It is behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and high translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103302.png&amp;diff=810549</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103302.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103302.png&amp;diff=810549"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T16:48:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: Ml9418 uploaded a new version of File:MRD0158103302.png&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=810513</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=810513"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T16:28:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Dynamics of the Reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Transition State&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point on the minimum energy path with the highest energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
A transition state can be identified by following the minimum energy path on the potential energy surface and finding the point with the highest potential energy. For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r1=r2. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path ends is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r1=r2 line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.8 pm. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103302.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens A-B, B-C and A-C for the aforementioned reaction plotted against time. The transition state where r1 = r2= ~90.8 pm is circled in red. B-C here corresponds to the hydrogens in the reactant hydrogen molecule and A-B corresponds to the hydrogens in the product hydrogen molecule]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) or reaction path is a theoretical path of a reaction that corresponds to infinitely slow motion. It is different from the actual reaction trajectory because it corresponds to a situation where the reactants and products have only translational motion, and the kinetic energy of the system is zero at all times. The real trajectory of the reaction is not moving infinitely slowly, it has kinetic energy, and it is also affected by the vibrational motion of the reactants and products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left), where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Testing different reaction trajectories for the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Running a simulation for this reaction over a long enough timespan gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Transition State Theory&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, and quantum tunneling can only have an impact because a hydrogen atom is the lightest atom that can exist. This tunnelling, however, does not occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Forward and Backward Reactions of  F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H ==&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and bond-forming hydrogen is 181.1 pm).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;The activation energy for the forwards reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backwards reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against time for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from a MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be seen in the form of translational, rotational, or vibrational motion. In this reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, and it works because radiative vibrational relaxation emits infrared radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction. For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the activation energy is large and a very large amount of translational energy is needed to overcome the barrier. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants on the MEP. It is behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state. The effect of these conditions is illustrated on the figures below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103313.png|left|frame|Figure 8: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high translational energy but low vibrational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low translational energy but high vibrational energy. These plots are for the endothermic reaction H + HF -&amp;gt; F + H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103314.png|left|frame|Figure 9: an unreactive trajectory (left) with high vibrational energy but low translational energy, and a reactive trajectory (right) with low vibrational energy and high translational energy. These plots are for the exothermic reaction F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103314.png&amp;diff=810466</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103314.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103314.png&amp;diff=810466"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T16:12:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103313.png&amp;diff=810456</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103313.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103313.png&amp;diff=810456"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T16:08:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=810450</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=810450"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T16:07:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Dynamics of the Reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Transition State&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point on the minimum energy path with the highest energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
A transition state can be identified by following the minimum energy path on the potential energy surface and finding the point with the highest potential energy. For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r1=r2. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path ends is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r1=r2 line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.8 pm. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103302.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens A-B, B-C and A-C for the aforementioned reaction plotted against time. The transition state where r1 = r2= ~90.8 pm is circled in red. B-C here corresponds to the hydrogens in the reactant hydrogen molecule and A-B corresponds to the hydrogens in the product hydrogen molecule]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) or reaction path is a theoretical path of a reaction that corresponds to infinitely slow motion. It is different from the actual reaction trajectory because it corresponds to a situation where the reactants and products have only translational motion, and the kinetic energy of the system is zero at all times. The real trajectory of the reaction is not moving infinitely slowly, it has kinetic energy, and it is also affected by the vibrational motion of the reactants and products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left), where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Testing different reaction trajectories for the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Running a simulation for this reaction over a long enough timespan gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Transition State Theory&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, and quantum tunneling can only have an impact because a hydrogen atom is the lightest atom that can exist. This tunnelling, however, does not occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H and its Reverse Reaction ==&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and bond-forming hydrogen is 181.1 pm).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;The activation energy for the forwards reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backwards reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against time for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from a MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be seen in the form of translational, rotational, or vibrational motion. In this reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether the reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the product molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see hot bands along with the main peaks, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the product molecules relax to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, and it works because radiative vibrational relaxation emits infrared radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The required distribution of kinetic energy between translational and vibrational motion is different in an exothermic reaction and an endothermic reaction. For an exothermic reaction, where the products have a lower potential energy than the reactants, and the activation energy is small, it is better to have less vibrational energy and more translational energy. This is because the activation energy barrier is small and the transition state is directly ahead of the reactants on the potential energy surface plot. This means that the barrier can be easily overcome with enough translational motion, and then the trajectory will just fall into the lower energy products area. Having excess vibrational motion, in this case, could prevent the reaction from occurring because the movement of the vibrational motion on the potential energy surface plot is in a different direction than the minimum energy path. Because of this, excess vibrational energy will cause the trajectory of the reaction to move back and forth up the valley. At the transition state, this can increase the energy barrier that needs to be overcome, and might cause the trajectory to simply fall back towards the products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For an endothermic reaction, the activation energy is large and a very large amount of translational energy is needed to overcome the barrier. On a potential energy surface, the transition state is also not directly ahead of the reactants on the MEP. It is behind the valley&#039;s corner, so approaching it directly requires a very large energy barrier to be overcome. Vibrational motion is more useful in this case because it does not move along the minimum energy path, and if the vibrational motion is timed right, it can more easily overcome the large activation energy barrier. This is because if the timing of the vibrational motion is right, the direction of the trajectory will curve behind the valley&#039;s corner in the exact right way for the trajectory to be heading directly towards the transition state.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=810253</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=810253"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T15:05:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Transition State&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)/∂r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is zero in all directions. It is the point on the minimum energy path with the highest energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
A transition state can be identified by following the minimum energy path on the potential energy surface and finding the point with the highest potential energy. For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r1=r2. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. The exact location of the transition state for a reaction with a symmetric potential energy surface can be found by running a minimum energy path simulation starting from a point where r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The point where that minimum energy path ends is the transition state. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 1: potential energy surface plot of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the diagonal r1=r2 line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red]] &amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down). A local minimum, on the other hand, has positive Gaussian curvature, meaning that the curvature is in the same direction all around (up in this case).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.8 pm. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103302.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens A-B, B-C and A-C for the aforementioned reaction plotted against time. The transition state where r1 = r2= ~90.8 pm is circled in red. B-C here corresponds to the hydrogens in the reactant hydrogen molecule and A-B corresponds to the hydrogens in the product hydrogen molecule]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The MEP (minimum energy path) or reaction path is a theoretical path of a reaction that corresponds to infinitely slow motion. It is different from the actual reaction trajectory because it corresponds to a situation where the reactants and products have only translational motion, and the kinetic energy of the system is zero at all times. The real trajectory of the reaction is not moving infinitely slowly, it has kinetic energy, and it is also affected by the vibrational motion of the reactants and products. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103303.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 3: a comparison of the MEP (right) and the actual reaction path (left), where both paths start from a point that is minimally deviated from the transition state (r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1=r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ts&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;+1)]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Testing different reaction trajectories for the reaction H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; -&amp;gt; H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Running a simulation for this reaction over a long enough timespan gives the values of momenta required for the reaction to occur. For r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm, the required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is between -3.1 and -1.6 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The required value for the momentum p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is -5.1 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It might seem a fair assumption that all trajectories with the same starting positions, but with higher values of momenta than the minimum required values, would result in the reaction going through to the products. To test this assumption, a table has been constructed where various values for momenta have been tested with the same starting positions r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ab&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 74 pm and r&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;bc&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 200 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &lt;br /&gt;
! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! E&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;tot&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/ kJ.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; !! Reactive? !! Description of the dynamics !! Illustration of the trajectory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -2.56 || -5.1 || -414.28 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches the molecule directly and forms H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, which is vibrationally excited. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once || [[File:MRD0158103304.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -4.1 || -420.08 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches but is unable to displace H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, and drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path does not cross the activation energy barrier. || [[File:MRD0158103305.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -3.1 || -5.1 || -413.97 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in a vibrationally excited state, H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier once. || [[File:MRD0158103306.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.1 || -357.2 || No || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier twice. || [[File:Mrd0158103307.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| -5.1 || -10.6 || -349.4 || Yes || H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is in the vibrational ground state. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, but the repulsion between H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; overcomes the attraction and forces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to separate. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; to produce H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; once again. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; then approaches and displaces H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; a second time to produce a vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; drifts away from the vibrationally excited H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Path crosses the activation energy barrier three times. || [[File:MRD0158103308.png|750px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The results from these simulations show that not all trajectories starting from the same positions are reactive, even those that have larger momenta than required. The right combination of momenta is needed for a reaction to occur. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Transition State Theory&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Transition State Theory tries to predict the rate constant for a reaction based on the properties of the reactants and the structure of the transition state. It is based on an assumption that all trajectories along the reaction coordinate with a kinetic energy higher than the activation energy will be reactive. However, as we determined from the previous tests, it is possible for the reaction trajectory to pass the activation energy barrier to form products briefly, but then cross the barrier once more to form the reactants again. In those cases, the trajectory is not reactive, even though it has enough kinetic energy to overcome the activation energy barrier. For this reaction, there is also a possibility for the reaction to occur without having enough kinetic energy to pass the barrier. This is possible due to quantum tunneling, and quantum tunneling can only have an impact because a hydrogen atom is the lightest atom that can exist. This tunnelling, however, does not occur frequently enough to overcome the reduction in rate caused by the possibility of recrossing the activation energy barrier. This means that the actual rate of reaction will be smaller than the one determined by Transition State Theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dynamics of the Reaction F + H2 -&amp;gt; HF + H and its Reverse Reaction ==&lt;br /&gt;
The forward reaction is exothermic, whereas the backward reaction is endothermic. This is visible on the surface and contour plots below, as the forward reaction products are lower in potential energy than the reactants. This is because the H-F bond is stronger (565 kJ/Mol) than the H-H bond (432 kJ/mol), making the products HF and H more stable than the reactants H2 and F.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103309.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 4: potential energy surface (left) and contour plot (right) for the reaction, where A is the fluorine atom, and B and C are the hydrogen atoms]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;The location of the transition state is approximately AB = 181.1 pm and BC = 74.5 pm (distance between hydrogens is 74.5 pm and distance between fluorine and bond-forming hydrogen is 181.1 pm).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103310.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 5: transition state of the reaction displayed on a contour plot]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;The activation energy for the forwards reaction is ~1.05 kJ/mol and for the backwards reaction it is ~126.67 kJ/mol.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103311.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 6: energies plotted against time for going from the transition state to the reactants (left) and to the products (right). This is from a MEP simulation, not a dynamics simulation. The activation energy is the difference between the minimum and maximum energy plateaus]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;For the forward reaction, which is exothermic, the products have less potential energy than the reactants. Because total energy must always be conserved, this means that the products must have a higher kinetic energy than the reactants. Kinetic energy can be seen in the form of translational, rotational, or vibrational motion. In this reaction, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy in the form of vibrational motion. This is shown on the figure below.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:MRD0158103312.png|frame|thumb|left|Figure 7: contour plot of the forward reaction, where the starting positions are AB = 230 pm, BC = 74 pm, p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = -2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 2 g.mol&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.pm.fs&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;To confirm whether reaction energy is being released vibrationally, one could probe the reaction via IR spectroscopy. If the reaction energy is not converted to vibrational energy, all the molecules in the reaction would be in the ground state. An IR spectrum, in this situation, would only display the peaks going from the ground state to higher vibrational energy states. However, if the reaction energy does get converted to vibrational energy, some of the molecules would populate higher vibrational energy levels, and an IR spectrum would also show peaks going from the higher energy states to even higher energy states. Those peaks are called hot bands. Since the differences between neighboring energy levels for an anharmonic oscillator become smaller at higher energy levels, an IR spectrum would show smaller hot bands that are slightly shifted to smaller wavenumbers from the main peaks. If many IR spectra were taken throughout the reaction, one would at first see no hot bands, then the main peaks would get smaller as hot bands develop, then the hot bands would shrink and the main bands grow as the molecules relax back to the ground state.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Another way to determine whether vibrational excitation is occurring is to probe the reaction using infrared chemiluminescence. This is a technique for detecting changes in infrared emission during a reaction, and it works because radiative vibrational relaxation emits infrared radiation.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103312.png&amp;diff=810152</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103312.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103312.png&amp;diff=810152"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T14:26:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103311.png&amp;diff=810126</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103311.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103311.png&amp;diff=810126"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T14:16:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: Ml9418 uploaded a new version of File:MRD0158103311.png&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103311.png&amp;diff=810110</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103311.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103311.png&amp;diff=810110"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T14:10:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103310.png&amp;diff=810091</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103310.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103310.png&amp;diff=810091"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T13:56:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103309.png&amp;diff=810053</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103309.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103309.png&amp;diff=810053"/>
		<updated>2020-05-22T13:27:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103308.png&amp;diff=808940</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103308.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103308.png&amp;diff=808940"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T18:59:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Mrd0158103307.png&amp;diff=808938</id>
		<title>File:Mrd0158103307.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:Mrd0158103307.png&amp;diff=808938"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T18:54:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103306.png&amp;diff=808921</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103306.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103306.png&amp;diff=808921"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T18:32:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103305.png&amp;diff=808912</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103305.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103305.png&amp;diff=808912"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T18:24:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103304.png&amp;diff=808897</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103304.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103304.png&amp;diff=808897"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T18:17:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103303.png&amp;diff=808835</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103303.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103303.png&amp;diff=808835"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T17:27:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103302.png&amp;diff=808780</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103302.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103302.png&amp;diff=808780"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T16:58:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: Ml9418 uploaded a new version of File:MRD0158103302.png&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=808756</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=808756"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T16:52:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Transition State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(ri)/∂ri is zero in all directions. It is the point on the minimum energy path with the highest energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
A transition state can be identified by following the minimum energy path on the potential energy surface and finding the point with the highest potential energy. For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r1=r2. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.8 pm. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103302.png|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens A-B, B-C and A-C plotted against time]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=808753</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=808753"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T16:51:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Transition State */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Transition State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(ri)/∂ri is zero in all directions. It is the point on the minimum energy path with the highest energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
A transition state can be identified by following the minimum energy path on the potential energy surface and finding the point with the highest potential energy. For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r1=r2. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A transition state is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2, the transition state is at a point where the distances between neighboring hydrogen atoms are around 90.8 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MRD0158103302.png|thumb|Figure 2: internuclear distances of hydrogens A-B, B-C and A-C plotted against time]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103302.png&amp;diff=808748</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103302.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103302.png&amp;diff=808748"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T16:49:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=808735</id>
		<title>MRD:ML9418</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=MRD:ML9418&amp;diff=808735"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T16:36:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: Created page with &amp;quot; == Transition State ==  The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(ri)/∂ri is zero in all d...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Transition State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition state on a potential energy surface diagram is defined as the point where the gradient of the potential ∂V(ri)/∂ri is zero in all directions. It is the point on the minimum energy path with the highest energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
A transition state can be identified by following the minimum energy path on the potential energy surface and finding the point with the highest potential energy. For a symmetric potential energy surface, the transition state lies on the diagonal line where r1=r2. It is the point on that line with the lowest potential energy. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[File:MRD0158103301.png]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Figure 1: The potential energy surface plot of the reaction H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2, where the diagonal r1=r2 line is dotted in black and the transition state is circled in red. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It is different from a local minimum due to the fact that it is a saddle point, meaning the surface around it has negative Gaussian curvature. This means that the maximal and minimal values of curvature around the transition state are of opposite signs, meaning they curve in opposite directions (up and down).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103301.png&amp;diff=808730</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103301.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103301.png&amp;diff=808730"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T16:33:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: Ml9418 uploaded a new version of File:MRD0158103301.png&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Potential energy surface plot of H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103301.png&amp;diff=808729</id>
		<title>File:MRD0158103301.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:MRD0158103301.png&amp;diff=808729"/>
		<updated>2020-05-21T16:32:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: Potential energy surface plot of H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Potential energy surface plot of H2 + H -&amp;gt; H + H2&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752153</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752153"/>
		<updated>2019-03-08T13:53:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Bond Lengths of PCl3F2 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|500px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, phosphorus 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, phosphorus 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The equatorial P-Cl bond length is shorter than the axial P-Cl bond length, just as the equatorial P-F bond length is shorter than the axial P-F bond length. The reason is that the axial bonds are formed from the overlap with an unhybridized phosphorus 3p orbital, while the equatorial bonds are formed from overlap with sp2 hybridized phosphorus orbitals, which have more s character.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752104</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752104"/>
		<updated>2019-03-08T13:24:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Molecular Orbitals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|500px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, phosphorus 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, phosphorus 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752103</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752103"/>
		<updated>2019-03-08T13:23:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Molecular Orbitals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|500px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752102</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752102"/>
		<updated>2019-03-08T13:22:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Molecular Orbitals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|500px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752101</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=752101"/>
		<updated>2019-03-08T13:22:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Molecular Orbitals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|500px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals and chlorine 3p&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750752</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750752"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:56:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|190px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|500px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750751</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750751"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:55:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|170px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|500px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750749</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750749"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:51:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: /* Molecular Orbitals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750748</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750748"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:50:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antionding&lt;br /&gt;
| 0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
| -0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750742</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750742"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:47:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
|-0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|-0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
|-0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antionding&lt;br /&gt;
|0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
|-0.56466 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750741</id>
		<title>Rep:Mod:testosterone420</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=Rep:Mod:testosterone420&amp;diff=750741"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:47:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== &#039;&#039;&#039;NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of NH3&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-56.55776&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000485&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|C&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3V&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.02 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-N-H bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|105.7° ± 1°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000004     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000004     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000072     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000035     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_vibrations.jpg|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!1090&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!1694&lt;br /&gt;
!3461&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
!3590&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|A1&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|E&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|145&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_NH3_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 4 - 6 = 6 modes. The modes at 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; are degenerate, as well as the modes at 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The bending modes are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 1694 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and the stretching modes are the ones at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 1090 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of gaseous ammonia, the expected number of bands would be  4, because 4 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 3461 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 3590 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_NH3_OPT.LOG| Gaussian job file of NH3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of nitrogen is higher than that of hydrogen, the expected charge distribution would be a negative charge on nitrogen and a positive charge on the hydrogens. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_NH3_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of N2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_N2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-109.52412&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000060&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|N-N bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.11 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000001     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000001     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000000     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000000     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!2457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_N2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 2457 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of nitrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_N2.LOG| Gaussian job file of N2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since a nitrogen molecule consists of 2 nitrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_N2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of H2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_H2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1.17853&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000023&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;∞h&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|H-H bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.74 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000000     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000000     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000001     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000001     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_vibrations2.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!4466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|SGG&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity (arbitrary units)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_H2_vibration.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-5 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 mode, which is at 4466 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a stretching mode and since it is symmetric, there is no change in dipole, and it is not IR active. In an experimental spectrum of hydrogen gas, the expected number of bands would be  0, because because there are no modes with a change in dipole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_H2.LOG| Gaussian job file of H2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Since a hydrogen molecule consists of 2 hydrogen atoms with the same electronegativity, the overall charge is 0 and the charge on each atom is also 0.  The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_H2_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Mono-Metallic Transition Metal Complex Incorporating H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
There is a complex that coordinates H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, where the bond length between the hydrogens is different than in hydrogen gas. The complex is Chloro-(dihydrogen-H,H&#039;)-hydrido-tris(triphenylphosphine)-osmium, with the identifier [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.200502297 CEFCAS]. The H-H bond distance in the complex is 1.482 Å. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The reason for the increased bond length is the that the d orbitals of the osmium atom overlap with the bonding and antibonding orbitals of the two hydrogens, increasing the antibonding character in the H-H bond, weakening it and elongating it. Eventually, this H-H bond gets cleaved, leaving 2 hydride ligands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Also, when calculating the bond lengths with software, some approximations have to be made, which changes the result. Experimentally obtained values may also be affected by external factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of the metal complex&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_CEFCAS.mol2&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Energy of Formation of Ammonia&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The formation of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen gas goes as follows: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
N2 + 3H2 -&amp;gt; 2NH3 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The energy change of this reaction can be found by calculating the energies of each reactant and products, then subtracting the energy of the reactants from the energy of the products. The energies of the reactants and products have been determined in the previus sections.&lt;br /&gt;
*E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -56.55776 au&lt;br /&gt;
*2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -113.11553 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -109.52412 au&lt;br /&gt;
*E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -1.17853 au&lt;br /&gt;
*3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) = -3.53561 au&lt;br /&gt;
*ΔE = 2 * E(NH&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) - [E(N&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) + 3 * E(H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;)]= -113.11553 - (-109.52412 -3.53561) = -0.0557 au &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In kJ/mol that value is approximately -146.8. Since ΔE is negative, ammonia must be more stable than the gaseous reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PF3Cl2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Properties ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecule&lt;br /&gt;
!PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Calculation method&lt;br /&gt;
|RB3LYP&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basis set&lt;br /&gt;
|6-31G(D,P)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Final energy (au)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-1561.34405&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|RMS gradient&lt;br /&gt;
|0.00000295&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Point group&lt;br /&gt;
|D&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3H&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-Cl bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|2.10 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|P-F bond length (Å)&lt;br /&gt;
|1.58 ± 0.01&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-F bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|180°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|F-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|90°&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cl-P-Cl bond angle&lt;br /&gt;
|120°&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
         Item               Value     Threshold  Converged?&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Force            0.000008     0.000450     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Force            0.000003     0.000300     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 Maximum Displacement     0.000046     0.001800     YES&lt;br /&gt;
 RMS     Displacement     0.000014     0.001200     YES&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vibrational Modes ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_vibrations.png|350px|thumb|The vibrational modes of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Wavenumber (cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Symmetry&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Intensity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Image&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;IR Activity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
!&#039;&#039;&#039;Mode&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration1.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|117&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration2.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration3.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|348&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration4.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|353&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration5.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration6.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|371&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1, A&#039;2, or A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration7.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|451&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;&#039;2&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration8.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|589&lt;br /&gt;
|A&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;2&lt;br /&gt;
|683&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration9.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|707&lt;br /&gt;
|A&#039;1&lt;br /&gt;
|0&lt;br /&gt;
|No&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration10.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration11.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|985&lt;br /&gt;
|E&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|189&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_vibration12.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Stretching&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Note: for the modes at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, Gaussian was unable to determine symmetry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the 3N-6 rule, the expected number of vibrational modes is 3 x 6 - 6 = 12 modes. There are degenerate pairs of vibrational modes at 116 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 349cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and 985 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The vibrational modes are the first 7 (up to 371 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), excluding the mode at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. The rest of them are stretching modes. The modes that are highly symmetric are the ones at 353 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 707 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In an experimental spectrum of PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, the expected number of bands would be  5, because 6 modes are actually pairs of degenerate modes and 4 modes are IR inactive. In reality, it would be very difficult to make out the degenerate vibrational modes at 117 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 451 cm&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; on a spectrum, because their intensity is so low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:01581033_MOLECULE.LOG| Gaussian job file of PF3Cl2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Charge Distribution ====&lt;br /&gt;
Considering the electronegativity of fluorine is the highest, chlorine the second highest, and phosphorus the lowest, the expected charge distribution would be a high negative charge on the fluorine atoms, a weaker negative charge on the chlorine atoms, and a positive charge on the phosphorus atom. The calculated charge distribution is on the image below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:01581033_molecule_charges.jpg|400px|thumb|left|The distribution of charges in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Molecular Orbitals ====&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Molecular Orbital Number&lt;br /&gt;
!Image&lt;br /&gt;
!Atomic Orbitals Involved&lt;br /&gt;
!Bonding or Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
!Energy&lt;br /&gt;
!Filled or Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital38HOMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
|-0.33759 au (HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals and chlorine 3p orbitals&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of HOMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|-0.51680 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with 2 electrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3s orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antibonding&lt;br /&gt;
|-0.07701 au (LUMO)&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Antionding&lt;br /&gt;
|0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|27&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fluorine 2p orbitals, chlorine 3p orbitals, phosphorus 3p orbital&lt;br /&gt;
|Bonding (bonding equivalent of molecular orbital 40)&lt;br /&gt;
|0.03013 au&lt;br /&gt;
|Empty&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
==== Bond Lengths of PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;jmol&amp;gt;&amp;lt;jmolApplet&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;title&amp;gt;Interactive structure of PCl3F2&amp;lt;/title&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;color&amp;gt;black&amp;lt;/color&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;size&amp;gt;200&amp;lt;/size&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;01581033_MOLECULE2.LOG&amp;lt;/uploadedFileContents&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/jmolApplet&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/jmol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The bond lengths for PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; are different , because of the equatorial and axial positions are in different environments. The P-F bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 1.62 Å, compared to 1.58 Å for PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-Cl bond length in PCl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is 2.05 Å, compared to 2.10 Å in PF&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;Cl&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. The P-F bond length increased, because each F atom feels electron-electron repulsion from 3 larger chlorine atoms. The P-Cl bond length also increased because the chloring atoms are closer and feel a stronger electrostatic repulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mytestref&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2005, 44,7227–7230, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200502297&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg&amp;diff=750736</id>
		<title>File:01581033 molecule orbital27.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital27.jpg&amp;diff=750736"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:46:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg&amp;diff=750731</id>
		<title>File:01581033 molecule orbital40.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital40.jpg&amp;diff=750731"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:43:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg&amp;diff=750711</id>
		<title>File:01581033 molecule orbital30.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital30.jpg&amp;diff=750711"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:31:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital24.jpg&amp;diff=750710</id>
		<title>File:01581033 molecule orbital24.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital24.jpg&amp;diff=750710"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:31:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg&amp;diff=750678</id>
		<title>File:01581033 molecule orbital39LUMO.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://chemwiki.ch.ic.ac.uk/index.php?title=File:01581033_molecule_orbital39LUMO.jpg&amp;diff=750678"/>
		<updated>2019-03-07T13:16:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ml9418: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ml9418</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>